Buradasınız

Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında Görev Yapan İdari Personelin Duygusal Emek Davranışları

Emotional Labor Behaviors of Administrative Staff Working at Higher Education Institutions

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Individuals feel different emotions both in and outside of their business lives. In this frame, emotions have a basic role for individuals‘ behaviors and the determiners from their inner worlds to mutual relations. Despite the importance of emotions in people‘s life, it is seen that this phenomenon was ignored for a long time in organizational life and organizations were tried to be structured in accordance with rationalist approach. The discovery of emotions as an important factor for organizational processes is fairly recent. Emotions‘ gaining importance at working places and reconsidering organizational life like that coincide with the view of serving sector‘s rising. It is important in terms of understanding behaviors in organizations since emotions can affect behaviors in various ways. Emotions are more intensely felt especially for the works depend on human being. Individuals are expected to control their emotions and directed in their working life. It is known that these expectations rise more especially in educational institutions which there are a human based atmosphere and face-to-face relationships and communication types. Researches about emotions firstly emerged as management of emotions in accordance with the organizational aims and description of organizational feeling rules required for individuals. Today employers‘ efforts to shape workers‘ emotions and emotional displays caused that emotional effort concept gain importance in the field of organizational behavior. In this sense, emotional labor is the effort, planning and control needed to express desired level of emotions while on work. It is a form of regulation in which human resources are expected to display certain emotions as part of their job and to promote organizational goals. Emotional labor includes evaluating when to express feelings and when not to, assessing what are and what are not appropriate expression of emotion, and managing and regulating such expression of emotions. Individuals still have several ways to emotional labor in which they can produce their appropriate emotional displays. These strategies mentioned in the researches conducted on emotional labor are classified as deep acting, surface acting and genuine emotion. Surface acting involves employees expressing the emotions required by the job without actually feeling those emotions. It is usually related not be able to display one‘s negative feelings or acts as s/he feels positively. Deep acting, whereby one attempts to actually experience or feel the emotions that one wishes to display. When engaging in deep acting an actor attempts to modify feelings to match the required displays. Genuine emotion is type of behavior that emerges when feelings that personnel had to reflect and already felt are same. Emotional labor as an emotional management process might cause some positive and/or negative effects on the staff based on the relationship between displayed feelings and real feelings. Researches about emotional labor generally focused on understanding and explaining the negative effects of this phenomenon on the staff and so positive effects of emotional labor have been not studied much. In this research, emotional labor behaviors of administrative personnel working in universities were studied. The population of research consists of administrative personnel working in Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University. The sample was selected by simple random sampling method and 191 people were selected. Since emotional labor behaviors of administrative personnel working in universities were determined, it is a descriptive study in survey model. Emotional labor scale was used as a data collection tool. According to the results, it is seen that participants display genuine emotions more than other emotional labor strategies and they display surface acting behaviors partially. In terms of gender variable and deep acting aspect, there is a significant difference in favor of male participants and there is not any significant difference for other aspects. As compared to service period in the assigned department, there is a significant difference among the views of participants for deep acting and genuine emotion aspects. Besides, there are also significant differences for deep acting aspect in terms of service period in his/her profession and age variables. As the correlations among the aspects were analyzed, it is seen that aspects of emotional labor scale are correlated to each other and the highest relationship is between deep acting and surface acting sub-aspects. Emotional labor is not a commonly used concept in the field of Educational Sciences and there are limited researches related to this topic. Education is also a serving sector and it is one of the areas in which emotions are active most intensely. Therefore, more studies are required. For example, emotional labor concept can be examined for different variables and grade levels. In addition, in order not to get negative results from emotional labor behaviors, personnel can be supported about emotional management and administrators can be trained considering management of emotional climate by means of trainings, seminars, and other activities.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çalışma yaşamında duyguların önemli bir yeri vardır. Rasyonel bakış açısıyla uzun süre önemsenmeyen duygularınhizmet sektörünün de gelişmesiyle birlikte önemsendiği ve araştırma konusu yapıldığı görülmektedir. Duygular, davranışları pek çok şekilde etkileyebildiğinden örgütteki davranışları anlamak açısından önemlidir. Günümüzde işverenlerin; çalışanların duygularını ve duygusal gösterimlerini şekillendirme çabaları, duygusal emek kavramının örgütsel davranış alanında önem kazanmasına neden olmuştur. Bu çalışmada yükseköğretim kurumlarında görev yapan idari personelin duygusal emek davranışları ele alınmıştır. Bu bağlamda Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi‟nde görev yapan 191 idari personele ulaşılmıştır. Çalışmada veri toplama aracı olarak duygusal emek ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre idari personelin duygusal emek stratejilerinden daha çok samimi davranış stratejisini benimsedikleri, yüzeysel davranış stratejisini ise daha az benimsedikleri ortaya çıkmıştır. Duygusal emek stratejilerinden derin davranış boyutunda cinsiyet, görev yaptığı birimdeki hizmet süresi, meslekteki hizmet süresi ve yaş değişkeni olmak üzere bütün değişkenlerde anlamlı farklılıklar söz konusudur. Samimi davranış boyutunda ise sadece görev yaptığı birimdeki hizmet süresi değişkeni açısından anlamlı farklılık söz konusudur. Yüzeysel davranış boyutunda ise değişkenler açısından anlamlı bir farklılığın bulunmadığı görülmüştür. Eğitim sektörü duyguların yoğun olarak yaşandığı bir hizmet sektörü olmasına rağmen bu alanda duygusal emek ile ilgili çalışmaların az olduğu görülmektedir. Bu alanda yapılacak farklı çalışmalarla duyguların çalışma yaşamındaki önemi ortaya konulabilir.
79
94

REFERENCES

References: 

ASHFORTH, B.E. ve HUMPHREY, R.H. (1993). ―Emotional Labor in Service Roles: The
Influence of Identity‖,Academy of Management Review,S: 18, s.88–115.
ASHKANASY, N. M. ve DAUS, C. S. (2002). ―Emotion in the Workplace: The New Challenge
for Managers‖,Academy of Management Executive, S: 16 (1), s. 76–86.
ASHKANASY, N. M., HÄRTEL, C. E. J. ve ZERBE,W. J. (2002). Emotions in the workplace:
Research, Theory, and Practice. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
90 | A. Çoruk
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2014, 33(1), 79-93
ASHKANASY, N. M.,ASHTON-JAMES, C. E. (2006). ―Emotion in Organizations: A Neglected
Topic in I/O Psychology, But with a Bright Future‖, International Review of Industrial and
Organizational Psychology,S: 20, s. 221-268.
BOYD, C. (2002). ―Customer Violence and Employee Health and Safety‖, Work, Employment &
Society,S: 16 (1), s. 151-169.
BROTHERIDGE C. M. ve GRANDEY A. A. (2002). ―Emotional Labor and Burnout:Comparing
Two Perspectives of ‗People Work‘‖, Journal of Vocational Behavior,S: 60, s.17 – 39.
BROTHERIDGE C. M. ve LEE R. T. (2002). ―Testing a Conservation of Resources Model of the
Dynamics of Emotional Labor‖,Journal of Occupational HealthPsychology, S: 7(1), s.57 –
67.
BROTHERIDGE C. M. ve LEE R. T. (2003). ―Development and Validation of theEmotional
Labour Scale‖,Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, S: 76, s.365-379.
BROTHERIDGE, C. M. ve LEE, R. T. (2008). ―Introduction: The Emotions of Managing: An
Introduction to the Special Issue‖,Journal of Managerial Psychology,S: 23 (2), s. 108-117.
BROWN, R. B. ve BROOKS, I. (2002). ―Emotion at Work. Identifying the Emotional Climate of
Night Nursing‖Journal of Management in Medicine,S: 16 (5), s. 327-344.
BYRADLEY, Y. (2010). Emotion Management and Transforming Organizational Culture: A
Case Study of Change and Innovation in a Multi-campus Canadian College,University of
Calgary, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Alberta.
CALLAHAN, J. L. ve McCOLLUM, E. E. (2002). ―Conceptualizations of Emotion Research in
Organizational Contexts‖,Advances in Developing Human Resources,S: 1 (4), s. 4-21.
ÇALDAĞ, M. A. (2010). Duygusal Emek DavranıĢlarının Sağlık ÇalıĢanlarında ĠĢ
Sonuçlarına Etkileri, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, YayınlanmamıĢ Yüksek
Lisans Tezi, Konya.
DIEFENDORFF, J. M., CROYLE, M. H. ve GOSSERAND, R. H. (2005). ―The Dimensionality and
Antecedents of Emotional Labor Strategies‖,Journal of Vocational Behavior,S: 66 (2), s. 339-
357.
DOMAGALSKĠ, T. A. (1999). ―Emotion in Organizations: Main Currents‖,Human Relations,S:
52 (6), s. 833-852.
DURSUN, S., BAYRAM, N. ve AYTAÇ, S. (2011). ―Duygusal Emeğin ĠĢ Tatmini ve Tükenme
Düzeyi Üzerine Etkisi‖, 17.Ulusal Ergonomi Kongresi,14-16 Ekim 2011, EskiĢehir:
Osmangazi Üniversitesi.
ERKUġ, A. ve GÜNLÜ, E. (2008). ―Duygusal Zekânın DönüĢümcü Liderlik Üzerine
Etkileri‖,ĠĢletme Fakültesi Dergisi,S: 9 (2),s. 187-209.
FINEMAN, S. (2000). Emotion in Organizations (2nd ed). London: Sage.
GRAMA, B. ve BOTONE, D. (2009). ―The Role of Emotions in Organizational
Behaviour‖,Annals of the University of PetroĢani, Economics,S: 9 (3), s. 315-320.
GRANDEY, A. A. (2000). ―Emotion Regulation in the Workplace: A New Way to Conceptualize
Emotional Labor‖,Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,S: 5 (1), s. 95–110.
GRANDEY, A. A.(2003). ―When ‗The Show Must Go On‘: Surface Acting and Deep Acting
Determinants of Emotional Exhaustion and Peer-Rated Service Delivery‖,Academy of
Management Journal,S: 46 (1), s. 86-96.
İdari Personelin Duygusal Emek Davranışları | 91
ISSN: 1300-302X © 2014 OMÜ EĞĠTĠM FAKÜLTESĠ
GÜNGÖR, M. (2009). ―Duygusal Emek Kavramı: Süreci ve Sonuçları‖, Kamu-ĠĢ; S:11 (1), s. 167-
184.
HOCHSCHILD, A.R. (1983). The Managed Heart. University of California Press, Berkeley and
Los Angeles, CA.
KÖKSEL, L. (2009), ĠĢ YaĢamında Duygusal Emek ve Ampirik Bir ÇalıĢma, Celal Bayar
Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, YayımlanmamıĢ Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Aydın.
LORD, R. G., KLIMOSKI, R. J. ve KANFER, R. (2002). Emotions in the Workplace:
Understanding the Structure and Role of Emotions in Organizational Behavior. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
MAN, F.,SELEK-ÖZ, C. (2009). ―Göründüğü Gibi Olamamak Ya Da Olduğu Gibi
Görünememek: Çağrı Merkezlerinde Duygusal Emek‖,ÇalıĢma ve Toplum, S: 20 (1), s. 75-94
MANN, S. (2007). ―Expectations of Emotional Display in the workplace‖,Leadership &
Organizational Development Journal,S: 28 (6), s. 552-570.
MIDDLETON, D. R. (1989). ―Emotional Style: The Cultural Ordering of Emotions‖,Ethos,S: 17,
s. 187-201.
MĠLLER, K. I., CONSĠDĠNE, J. ve GARNER, J. (2007). ―‘'Let Me Tell You About My Job‘':
Exploring the Terrain of Emotion in the Workplace‖,Management Communication
Quarterly,S: 20 (3), s. 231-260.
MORRIS, J. A. ve FELDMAN, D. C. (1996). ―The Dimensions, Antecedents, and Consequences
of Emotional Labor‖,Academy of Management Review,S: 21 (4), s. 986-1010.
MORRIS, J. A. ve FELDMAN, D. C. (1997). ―Managing Emotions in the Workplace‖, Journal of
Managerial Issues,S: 9 (3), s. 257-274.
ORAL, L. ve KÖSE, S. (2011). ―Hekimlerin Duygusal Emek Kullanımı ile ĠĢ Doyumu ve
TükenmiĢlik Düzeyleri Arasındaki ĠliĢkiler Üzerine Bir AraĢtırma‖,Süleyman Demirel
Üniversitesi, Ġktisadi ve Ġdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi,S: 16 (2), s.463-492.
PAYNE, R. L. ve COOPER, C. L. (2001). Emotion at Work: Theory, Research and Applications
for Management. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
SCHERER, K. R. ve TRAN, V. (2001). ―Effects of Emotion on the Process of Organizational
Learning‖Handbook of Organizational Learning,Ed:M. Dierkes, J. Childve I. Nonaka, UK:
Oxford University Press, s. 369-392.
SLOAN, M. M. (2007). ―The ―Real Self‖ and Inauthenticity: The Importance of Self-concept
Anchorage for Emotional Experiences in the Workplace‖,Social Psychology Quarterly,S: 3
(70), s. 305–318.
TOTTERDELL, P. (2002). What is? Emotion
Management?http://esrccoi.group.shef.ac.uk/pdf/whatis/emotion_management.pdf., ET:
01.12.2011.
TRAN, V. (1998). ―The Role of the Emotional Climate in Learning Organisations‖, The Learning
Organization,S: 5 (2), s. 99-103.
WHARTON, A. S. (1999). ―The Psychosocial Consequences of Emotional Labor‖,Annals of the
American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 561, s. 158-176.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com