Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. (2009). The influence of metacognitive training on preservice
elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. International Journal of
Science Education, 31(16), 2161-2184.
Abraham, M.R. (2003). The learning cyle approach as a strategy for instruction in sicence. In
B. J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.). International handbook of science education (pp. 513-
524). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
Açışlı, S., & Turgut, Ü. (2011). The examination of the influence of the materials generated
in compliance with 5E learning model on physics laboratory applications. International
Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 562-593
Ağgül-Yalçın, F., & Bayrakçeken, S. (2010). The effect of 5E learning model on pre-service
science teachers’ achievement of acids-bases subject. International Online Journal of
Educational Sciences 2(2), 508-531.
Appamaraka, S., Suksringarm, P., & Singseewo, A. (2009). Effects of learning environmental
education using the 5Es-learning cycle approach with the metacognitive moves and the
teacher’s handbook approach on learning achievement, integrated science process skills
and critical thinking of high school (grade 9) students. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences,
6(5), 287-291.
Ates, S. (2005). The effectiveness of the learning-cycle method on teaching dc circuits to
prospective female and male science teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education,
23(2), 213-227.
Baird, J. R., & White, R. T. (1984). Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: A
classroom study. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 249250)
Baker, L. (1991). Metacognition, reading, and science education. In C.M. Santa and D.E.
Alvermann (Eds.), Science learning: Processes and applications (pp. 2-13) Newark, DE:
International Reading Association.
Balci, S., Cakiroglu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Engagement, exploration, explanation, extension,
and evaluation (5E) learning cycle and conceptual change text as learning tools.
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34(3), 199-203.
Barman, C. R., Barman, N. S., & Miller, J. A. (1996). Two teaching methods and students’
understanding of sound. School Science and Mathematics, 96(2), 63-67.
Bektas, O. (2010). The effect of 5E learning cycle model on tenth grade students’ understanding
in the particulate nature of matter, epistemological beliefs and views of nature of
science. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara,
Turkey.
Blank, L. M. (2000). Metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for students understanding.
Science Education, 84, 486- 506.
Brownlee, J., Purdie, N., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2001). Changing epistemological beliefs in
pre-service teacher education students. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 247-268.
Bulbul, Y. (2010). Effects of 7E learning cycle model accompanied with computer animations
on understanding of diffusion and osmosis concepts. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,
Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Üst-Bilişsel 7E Öğrenme Döngüsünün Öğrencilerin Fizikteki Epistemolojik... 615
March 2016 Vol:24 No:2 Kastamonu Education Journal
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Cakiroglu, J. (2006). The effect of learning cycle approach on students’ achievement in science.
Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 22, 61-73.
Ceylan, E., & Geban, O. (2009). Facilitating conceptual change in understanding state of
matter and solubility concepts by using 5E learning cycle model. Hacettepe University
Journal of Education, 36, 41-50.
Cherry, G. R. (2011).Analysis of Attitude and Achievement using the 5E Instructional Model
in an Interactive Television Environment. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest
Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No.3455283)
Cobern, W. W., Schuster, D., Adams, B., Applegate, B., Skjold, B., Undreiu, A., & Gobert, J.
D. (2010). Experimental comparison of inquiry and direct instruction in science. Research
in Science & Technological Education, 28(1), 81-96.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale,
NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Dikici, A., Türker, H. H., & Özdemir, G. (2010). 5E öğrenme döngüsünün anlamlı öğrenmeye
etkisinin incelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(39), 100-128.
Dogru-Atay, P., & Tekkaya, C. (2008). Promoting students’ learning in genetics with the learning
cycle. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(3), 259-280.
Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expending 5E model: A proposed 7E model emphasizes “ transfer of
learning and importance of eliciting prior understanding. The Science Teacher, 70(6), 56-
59.
Elby, A. & Hammer, D. (2010). Epistemological resources and framing: A cognitive framework
for helping teachers interpret and respond to their students’ epistemologies. In L.
D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal Epistemology in the Classroom: Theory,
Research, and Implications for Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.
409-434.
Elby, A. (2001). Helping physics students learn how to learn. American Journal of Physics,
Physics Education Research Supplement, 69(7), S54–S64.
Elby, A., McCaskey, T., Lippmann, R. and Redish, E. F. (2001). Retrieved from http://www.
physics.umd.edu/perg/tools/attsur.htm
Farrell, J.J., Moog, R.S., & Spencer, J.N. (1999). A guided inquiry general chemistry course.
Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 570–574.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step By Step: A Simple Guide and Reference
(11.0 Update). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Georghiades, P. (2004). Making pupils’ conceptions of electricity more durable by means of
situated metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 85-99.
Georghiades, P. (2006). The role of metacognitive activities in the contextual use of primary
pupils’ conceptions of science. Research in Science Education, 36(1), 29-49.
Gill, M. G., Ashton, P. T., & Algina, J. (2004). Changing preservice teachers’ epistemological
beliefs about teaching and learning in mathematics: An intervention study. Contemporary
Educational Psychology, 29(2), 164-185.
616 Sevda YERDELEN-DAMAR, Ali ERYILMAZ...
Mart 2016 Cilt:24 No:2 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi
Hammer, D. M. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction,
12(2), 151-183.
Harurluoğlu, Y., & Kaya, E. (2011). The effect of learning cycle model on the achievements
and retention levels of pre-service science teachers in seed-fruit-flower topics. Iğdır University
Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 1(4), 43-50
Hennessey, M. (1993). Students’ ideas about their conceptualization: Their elicitation through
instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research
in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.
Hennessey, M. G. (1999). Probing the dimensions of metacognition: implications for conceptual
change teaching-learning. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 446921).
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs
about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research,
67(1), 88-140.
Hogan, K. (1999). Relating students’ personal frameworks for science learning to their cognition
in collaborative contexts. Science Education, 83(1), 1-32.
Kanli, U., & Yagbasan, R. (2008). The effects of a laboratory based on the 7E learning cycle
model with verification laboratory approach on students’ development of science process
skills and conceptual achievement. Essays in Education, 22 143-153.
Karplus, R., &. Their, H .D. (1967). A New Look at Elementary School Science. Chicago:
Rand McNally.
Kaynar, D., Tekkaya, C., & Cakiroglu, J. (2009). Effectiveness of 5E learning cycle instruction
on students’ achievement in cell concept and scientific epistemological beliefs. Hacettepe
University Journal of Education, 37, 96-105.
Kienhues, D., Bromme, R., & Stahl, E. (2008). Changing epistemological beliefs: The unexpected
impact of a short‐term intervention. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
78(4), 545-565.
Köseoğlu, F., & Tümay, H. (2010). The effects of learning cycle method in general chemistry
laboratory on students’ conceptual change, attitude and perception. Journal of Kirsehir
Education Faculty, 11(1), 279-295.
Lin, X., & Lehman, J. D. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer‐based
biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 837-858.
Liu, T. C., Peng, H., Wu, W. H., & Lin, M. S. (2009). The effects of mobile natural-science
learning based on the 5E learning cycle: A case study. Educational Technology & Society,
12 (4), 344–358.
Marek, E.A., & Cavallo, A. M. L. (1997). The learning cycle: Elementary school science and
beyond. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Mecit, O. (2006). The effect of 7E learning cycle model on the improvement of fifth grade students’
critical thinking skills, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical
University, Ankara, Turkey.
Michalsky, T., Mevarech, Z. R., & Haibi, L. (2009): Elementary School Children Reading
Scientific Texts: Effects of Metacognitive Instruction. The Journal of Educational Research,
102:5, 363-376
Üst-Bilişsel 7E Öğrenme Döngüsünün Öğrencilerin Fizikteki Epistemolojik... 617
March 2016 Vol:24 No:2 Kastamonu Education Journal
Mittlefehldt, S., & Grotzer, T. A. (2003, March). Using metacognition to facilitate the transfer
of causal models in learning density and pressure. Paper presented at National Association
of Research in Science Teaching Conference.
Muis, K. R., & Duffy, M. C. (2012, August 13). Epistemic Climate and Epistemic Change:
Instruction Designed to Change Students’ Beliefs and Learning Strategies and Improve
Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication.
doi:10.1037/a0029690
Parker, V., & Gerber, B. (2000). Effects of a Science Intervention Program on Middle‐Grade
Student Achievement and Attitudes. School Science and Mathematics, 100(5), 236-242.
Peters, E., & Kitsantas, A. (2010). The effect of nature of science metacognitive prompts on
science students’ content and nature of science knowledge, metacognition, and self‐regulatory
efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 110(8), 382-396.
Polyiem, T., Nuangchalerm,P., & Wongchantra, P. (2011). Learning achievement, science process
skills, and moral reasoning of ninth grade students learned by 7E learning cycle and
socioscientific issue-based learning. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences,
5(10): 257-564,
Redish, E. F., & Hammer, D. (2009). Reinventing college physics for biologists: Explicating
an epistemological curriculum. American Journal of Physics, 77(7), 629- 642.
Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M., & Steinberg, R. N. (1998). Student expectations in introductory
physics. American Journal of Physics, 66, 212–224.
Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence
on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656.
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education:
Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science
Education, 36, 111-139.
Siribunnam, R., & Tayraukham, S. (2009). Effects of 7-E, KWL and conventional instruction
on analytical thinking, learning achievement and attitudes toward chemistry learning. Journal
of Social Sciences, 5(4), 279-282.
Sornsakda, S., Suksringarm, P., & Singseewo, A. (2009). Effects of learning environmental
education using the 7E-learning cycle with metacognitive techniques and the teacher’s
handbook approaches on learning achievement, integrated science process skills and critical
thinking of mathayomsuksa 5 students with different learning achievement. Pakistan
Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 297-303.
Sriwattanarothai, N., Jittam, P., Ruenwongsa, P., & Panijpan, B.(2009) From research on local
materials to the learning of science: An inquiry-based laboratory for undergraduates. The
International Journal of Learning, 16(6), 459-473.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. (Fifth Ed.). Boston:
Pearson Education, Inc.
Temel, S., Dincol-Ozgur,S., & Yilmaz, A (2012). The effect of learning cycle model on preservice
chemistry teachers’ understanding of oxidation reduction topic and thinking skills.
Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,
6(1), 287-305.
618 Sevda YERDELEN-DAMAR, Ali ERYILMAZ...
Mart 2016 Cilt:24 No:2 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi
Tien, L. T. (1998). Fostering expert inquiry skills and beliefs about chemistry through the
MORE laboratory experience. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations
and Theses database. (UMI No. 9902256).
Trowbridge, L.W., Bybee, R.W., & Powell, J.C. (2004). Teaching secondary school science:
Strategies for developing scientific literacy (8th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
Turgut, U., & Gurbuz, F (2011). Effects of teaching with 5E model on students’ behaviors and
their conceptual changes about the subject of heat and temperature. International Online
Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 679-706.
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, Modeling and Metacognition: Making
Science Accessible To All Students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118
Yerdelen-Damar, S., Elby, A., & Eryilmaz, A. (2012). Applying beliefs and resources frameworks
to the psychometric analyses of an epistemology survey. Physical Review Special
Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(1), 010104.
Yildiz, E. (2008). The effects of metacognition during the instruction based on conceptual
change used with 5e model: an application regarding the force and motion subject in the
7th grade. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Yuruk, N., Beeth, M. E., & Andersen, C. (2009). Analyzing the effect of metaconceptual
teaching practices on students’ understanding of force and motion concepts. Research in
Science Education, 39(4), 449-475.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
