You are here

Numerical Analysis of Lining Hinge in Tunnels

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Design of support system in weak rocks has some special challenges to the geotechnical engineer because in these rocks very large forces will be applied to support systems of tunnels. The form and function of the support will vary according to a wide range of factors and it would seem that for every different tunnel there is a different lining solution. Using the lining hinge, the lining will be free to rotate about the hinge, and a zero bending moment condition will be enforced at that point, but axial force and shear force in the lining can be transmitted across the hinge location. The lining hinge can be added to the beam elements. The effect of the lining hinge on the lining of tunnels was analyzed by means of modeling the circular and horseshoe tunnels in shale rocks using the finite element program Phase2. The results of the evaluations show that lining hinge has no effect on the axial force of lining of tunnels, but it cause the shear force and bending moment of lining to be reduced. Furthermore, in horseshoe tunnels the effect of lining hinge in reducing loads on the lining is more specific than circular tunnels.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
25
30

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] A. Steindorfer, and W. Schubert, “Application of new methods of monitoring data analysis for short term prediction in tunneling”. In: Tunnels for People, World Tunnel Congress, Vienna. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1997, 65-69.
[2] W. Schubert, and P. Schubert, “Tunnels in squeezing rock: failure phenomena and counter actions”. In: Proc. ISRM Internat. Symposim on Assessment and Prevention of Failure Phenomena in Rock Engineering, Istanbul. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1993, 479-484.
[3] S. Klein, “An approach to the classification of weak rock for tunnel projects”. In: Proc. 15th Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc., Littleton, CO, 2000, 793-805.
[4] D. Brox, and H. Hagedorn, “Extreme deformation and damage during the construction of large tunnels”. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1991, 14, 23-28.
[5] R. Bhasin, A. W. Magnussen, and E. Grimstad, “The effect of tunnel size on stability problems in rock masses”. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology incorporating Trenchless Technology, 2006, 21, 405.
[6] N. Phien-wej, and E.J. Cording, “Sheared shale response to deep TBM excavation”. Eng. Geol. 1991, 30, 371-391.
[7] M. Panet, “Two case histories of tunnels through squeezing rocks”. Rock Mech. Rock Engng. 1996, 29 (3), 155-164.
[8] W. Steiner, “Tunneling in squeezing rock: case history”. Rock Mech. Rock Engng. 1996, 29 (4), 211-246.
[9] F.I. Shalabi, “FE analysis of time-dependent behavior of tunneling in squeezing ground using two different creep models”. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2005, 20, 271-279.
[10] E. Hoek, C. Carranza-Torres and B. Corkum, “Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion, 2002 Edition”. Rocscience, 2002.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com