Running head: ONLINE AND TRADITIONAL STUDENT DIFFERENCES

Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T.M., Hennessey, B.A., & Grossman, B.S. (1986). Social influences on creativity:
The effects of contracted-for rewards. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50:
14-23.
Anderson, M. D., & Hornby, P. A. (1996). Computer attitudes and the use of computers in
psychology courses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28: 341-
346.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning.
Educational Psychologist, 28: 117-148.
Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Cheung-Yuan,
L. (2000). Student motivation in the online learning environment. Journal of Educational
Media and Library Sciences, 37: 367-375.
Delcourt, M.A.B., & Kinzie, M.B. (1993). Computer technologies in teacher education: The
measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy. Journal of Research and Development in
Education, 27: 35-41.
99
Dutton, J., Dutton, M., & Perry, J. (2002). How do online students differ from lecture
students? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6.
Grolnick, W.S., & Ryan, R.M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental
and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52:
890-898.
Harter, S. (1980). A scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom.
Denver, CO: University of Denver.
Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the
classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17:
300-312.
Lepper, M. R., & Henderlong, J. (2000). Turning “Play” into “Work” and “Work” into
“Play”: 25 years of research on intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J.M.
Harackiewicz (Eds.) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation the search for optimal motivation
and performance (pp. 257-307). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Milbrath, Y. L., & Kinzie, M. B. (2000). Computer technology training for prospective
teachers: Computer attitudes and perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and
Teacher Education, 8: 373-396.
Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics
performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology,
24: 124-139.
Pajares, F., & Kranzler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in
mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20: 426-443.
Parish, T. S., & Necessary, J. R. (1996). An examination of cognitive dissonance and
computer attitudes. Education, 116: 565-566.
Qureshi, E., Morton, L.L., & Antosz, E. (2002). An interesting profile—University students
who take distance education courses show weaker motivation than on-campus students.
Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5.
Richards, C.N., & Ridley, D.R. (1997). Factors affecting college students’ persistence in
on-line computer-managed instruction. College Student Journal, 31: 490-495.
Roblyer, M.D. (1999). Is choice important in distance learning? A study of student
motives for taking Internet-based courses at the high school and community college
levels. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32:157.
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). When rewards compete with nature: The undermining of
intrinsic motivation and self-regulation. In C. Sansone & J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.) Intrinsic
and extrinsic motivation the search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 13-54).
San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Stipek, D. (1992). Motivation and instruction. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calree (Eds.),
Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 85-113). New York, NY: Macmillan Library
Reference.
Stipek, D., Salmon, J.M., Givvin, K.B., Kazemi, E., Saxe, G., & MacGyvers, V.L. (1998). The
value (and convergence) of practices suggested by motivation research and promoted by
mathematics education reformers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29:
465-488.
100
Tallent-Runnels, M.K., Thomas, J., Lan, W.Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T.C., & Xiaoming, L. (in
press). New models of learning: A review of research on the use of technology in online
courses. Review of Educational Research.
Valas, H., & Sovik, N. (1993). Variables affecting students’ intrinsic motivation for school
mathematics: Two empirical studies based on Deci & Ryan’s theory on motivation.
Learning and Instruction, 3: 281-298.