Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

MAHALLE ÖLÇEKLİ SOSYAL VE EKONOMİK ZARAR GÖREBİLİRLİĞİN ÖLÇÜLMESİ; SAKARYA ÖRNEĞİ

MEASURING THE DISTRICT BASED SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC VULNERABILITY: THE CASE OF SAKARYA

Journal Name:

  • Akademik Bakış

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The studies of disaster vulnerability are generally on regional areas where social life on micro and macro basis is leading. This study aimsto develop a model to measure social and economic vulnerability on micro basis. The model includes two main factors, five sub-factors and fifteen indicators. The indicators are determined according to Turkey’s specific conditions and available and measurable on the regional basis. Some of the information by public and private institutions is converted to data by Geographic Information Systems. The data is normalized by maximum and minimum values formula to make them available and aim to reach indications using the weights by experts. The model is applied on thirty four streets of Sakarya Metropolitan Municipality and the results are analysed.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Afette bağlızarar görebilirlik çalışmalarımikro ve makro seviyelerde sosyal hayatın sürdüğü bölgesel alanlar ile ilgilidir. Bu çalışmada zarar görebilirliği, mikro düzeyde, mahalle bazlıele alarak zarar görebilirliği sosyal ve ekonomik faktörlere göre ölçecek bir model oluşturulmuştur. Geliştirilen model 2 ana faktör ve bunlarla ilişkili beşalt faktör ve onbeşgösterge içermektedir. Göstergeler bölgesel düzeyde elde edilebilir ve sosyal ve ekonomik zarar görebilirliği ölçebilir nitelikte seçilmişolup ülkemiz şartlarına uygun olması dikkate alınmıştır. Kamu ve özel kuruluşlardan elde edilen bilgilerin bazılarıcoğrafi bilgi sistemi yardımıile işlenerek veri haline dönüştürülmüştür. Veriler gözlenen maksimum – minimum değer formülü ile normalleştirilerek kullanıla bilir hale geliştirilmişve uzmanların oluşturduklarıağırlıklar ile indeksi oluşturan gösterge değerlerine ulaşılmıştır. Oluşturulan model Sakarya Büyükşehir Belediyesi’ne bağlıotuz dört mahallede uygulanmışve sonuçları değerlendirilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-mahalle-olcekli-sosyal-ekonomik-zarar-gorebilirligin-olculmesi-sakarya-ornegi.pdf
  • 33
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Alexander, D. E. (2000). Confronting catastrophe: new perspecitives on natural disasters:
Oxford University Press, USA.
Birkmann, J. (2005). Expert Workshop: Measuring Vulnerability, Bonn.
Cannon, T. (1994). Vulnerability analysis and the explanation of ‘natural’disasters. Disasters,
development and the environment, 13-30.
Cannon, T., Twigg, J., & Rowell, J. (2003). Socialvulnerability, sustainable livelihoods and
disasters: London: DFID.
AKADEMİK BAKIŞ DERGİSİ
Sayı: 33 Kasım – Aralık 2012
UluslararasıHakemli Sosyal Bilimler E-Dergisi
ISSN:1694-528X İktisat ve Girişimcilik Üniversitesi, Türk Dünyası
Kırgız – Türk Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Celalabat – KIRGIZİSTAN
http://www.akademikbakis.org
14
Cardona, O. (2004). The Need for Rethinking the Conceptsof Vulnerability and Risk from a
Holistic Perspective: A Necessary Review and Criticism for Effective Risk Management.
London.
Cardona, O. D. (2005). Indicatorsof Disaster Risk and Risk Management Program for Latin
America and the Caribbean IDB Publications. Manizales - Colombia.
Chang, S. E., & Shinozuka, M. (2004). Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of
communities. Earthquake Spectra, 20(3), 739-755.
Cutter, S. L., & Finch, C. (2008). Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to
natural hazards. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(7), 2301.
Davidson, R. A. (1997). An urban earthquake disaster risk index.Stanford University.
Davidson, R. A., & Lambert, K. B. (2001). Comparing the Hurricane Disaster Risk of U. S.
Coastal Counties. Natural Hazards Review, 2(3), 132-142.
Davidson, R. A., & Shah, H. C. (1997). An Urban Earthqueke Disaster Risk Index:
Depertmant of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Few, R. (2003). Flooding, vulnerability and coping strategies: local responses to a global
threat. Progress in Development Studies, 3(1), 43-58.
Gallopín, G. (2010). Indicators and their Use: Information for decision-ability Indicators:
report of the project on Indicators of sustainability development. Newyork: John Wiley.
Kaly, U., Briguglio, L., McLeod, H., Schmall, S., Pratt, C., & Pal, R. (1999). Environmental
Vulnerability Index (EVI) to summarise national environmental vulnerability profiles.
Suva: South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission.
Mileti, D. S. (1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United
States: Natl Academy Pr.
O'Brien, K., Eriksen, S., Nygaard, L. P., & Schjolden, A. (2007). Why different
interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Climate Policy
Climate Policy, 7(1), 73-88.
Rygel, L., O’sullivan, D., & Yarnal, B. (2006). A method for constructing a social
vulnerability index: an application to hurricane storm surges in a developed country.
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11(3), 741-764.
Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global
environmental change, 16(3), 282-292.
UNEP. (2002 ). Assessing human vulnerability due to environmental change: Concepts,
issues, methods and case studies. (Vol. UNEP/DEWA/RS.03-5). Nairobi.
Vogel, C., & O'Brien, K. (2009). Vulnerability and global environmental change : rhetoric
and reality. Ottawa: GECHS Project, .
White, G. F., & Haas, J. E. (1975). Assessment of research on natural hazards: Mit Press.
Wood, N. J., Burton, C. G., & Cutter, S. L.(2010). Community variations in social
vulnerability to Cascadia-related tsunamis in the US Pacific Northwest. Natural
hazards, 52(2), 369-389.

Yılmaz, A. (2002). Afetlerden Önce Gerçekleştirilmesi Gereken Afet Yönetimi Çalışmaları.
Türk İdare Dergisi, 435.
Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Peacock, W. G., Vedlitz, A., & Grover, H. (2008). Social
vulnerability and the natural and built environment: a model of flood casualties in
Texas. Disasters, 32(4), 537-560.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com