Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

KLİNİK ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN AÇIORTAY TEKNİĞİ İLE ÇEKTİKLERİ PERÎAPİKAL RADYOGRAFİLERDE GÖRÜLEN HATALARIN İNCELENMESİ

THE INVESTIGATION OF THE ERRORS ON THE RADIOGRAPHIES TAKEN BY BISECTING ANfiLE TECHNIQUE MADE BY DENTAL STUDENT

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2000

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of This investigation was to investigate intraoral radiography in regards to frequency and types of errors, '['he present study used 6272 intraoral radiography made by dental student.A total of 6272 radiographs were made and 4254 (%67.8) were found to be unacceptable for one or more crrori. "The most frequent radiographic exposure errors oeeuring in this study were improper film placement (%59.1). cone-cut (9fcl6J5), improper vertical angulation (%13.7) and improper horizontal angulation (%5.8). The inosi frequent dark-room bath errors occuring in this study were insufficient developing (%4u), insufficient fixing (%36.4) and execive developing (%\5.(>y. This errors were classified according to the anatomic regions so the most of the errors found out was incorrect film placement on (he mandibular premolar region.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Ru çalınmanın amacı klinik öğrencilerinin açıortay tekniği ile çektiği periapıkal filmlerdeki hata tip ve sıklıklarım belirlemektir. Toplam 6272 radograf alındı ve bu filmlerin 4254'iindc bir veya birden laxla hata leşbit cdildi.En çok görülen film çekim halaları; yanlış film yerleştirme (%59.1), cone-cut C&16.8), yanlış vertikal açılama (%I3-7J ve yanlış horizontal açılama (%5.S) olarak kaydedildi. Karanlık-oda banyo hataları ise 1.banyoda az tutma t%40), 2.banyoda az tutma (%36.4) vc 1.banyoda çok tutma (•% 15.4) olarak lesbit edildi, Bu hatalar anatomik bölgelere göre değerlendirildiğinde en sık alt premolar bölgede yanlış film yerleştirme olarak kaydedildi.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-klinik-ogrencilerinin-aciortay-teknigi-ile-cektikleri-periapikal-radyografilerde-gorulen-hatalarin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 2
53-56
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. American Academy of Dental Radiology Quality Assurance Committee: Recommendations tor quality assurance in dental radiography. Oral Surg 1983; 55: 421-42rt,
2. tîeidcman RW, Johnson O, Alcox RW, Asludy to develop a rating system and evaluate dental radiographics submitted to a third party carrier. JADA 1976: 93: 1010-1013,
3. Grw. PW, White SC. Oral Radiology. 3 ed Mosby, Year Buok, İne, USA, 1994; 15 1-218.
4. Karakurnmcr K,
Özde
n T, Par S, Doğan N. Açıonav (Bisecting) tekniyle çekilen radyogramlarda förülen halaların incelenmesi. A Ü Diş llek Fak Derg 1990;I7{1):191-I93.
5. Manson-Hing LR, Bk^om RM. A stcnwed«equalirv Assurance test for machine and processor in dental radiography. JADA 1985; \ 10: 910-913,
6. Mourshed F. A study of intraoral radiographic errors made by dental students. Oral Surg 1971:32: 824-828.
7 Paksov CS
Cebeci ARİ. intraoral radyografilerde •.örülen hatalar, A Ü Diş Hek Fak Derg 1992; 19fl): 49-52.
8, Fatel JR. Intraoral radiographic errors. Oral Surg 1979:48:479-483.
9. Paid JR, Greer DK Evaluating student progress through error reduction in intraoral radiographic technique. Oral Surg 1986; 62:471-474.
10. Prccee JW. Recommendations lur Quality Assurance. Oral Surg 1983;55:421-426.
I ]. Stafne EC, Gıbılisco JA. Oral Rentgeiiographie Diagnosis. 4 ed \VB Saunders Lodon-Torunto, 1975; 365-368,
12.
Turgu
t C Film banyosu ve banyo hataları. H V Diş Hek Fak Derg 1983; 7:277-283.
13
Tura
m E Periapikal radvografJann çekimiııdeki teknik hatalar K 0 Hek Fak Dc'ıg 1984; 8:45-50.
14 Wuchrmann AH, revaluation criteria for iniraoral radiographic film quality, JADA 1971; 89:345-352.
15. Vv'Liehmıann All, Manson-Hing LR Dental Radiology, 5 ed CV Mosby. St-Fouis, 1981.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com