Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

İKİ FARKLI SABİT GEÇİCİ AKRİLİK RESTORASYON MATERYALİNİN TRANSVERS DAYANIKLILIĞININ VE MİKROSERTI İĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ

EVALUATION OF TRANSVERS STRENGTH AM) MICROHARDNESS OF TWO PROS THO DON TIC PROVISIONAL ACRYLIC MATERIALS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2002

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Provisional restorations play a critical role in the success of restorative treatments. Â provisional restoration must provide functional, comfortable, and an esthetic replacement for the prepared tooth structure. Aulupo!vnıeTİ/.iıîö acrylic: resin is the most commly used material" in provisional restorations. Thus study evaluated the transvers strength and microhardness of two prosthodontic provisional acrylic materials; (Dental on Plus-Germany), [Temdent-Germany). Bach product was applied according to manufacturer's instructions. After the resin spacimens were removed from the mold (63x20x3 mm), transverse strength and microhardness tests were applied. The result of the tests showed, significant differences of transvers strength and microhardness appeared between Dcntalon plus and Temdcnl.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
(]<;çid restorasyonlar, restoratil" tedavilerin başarısında önemli rol oynamaktadırlar. Geçici restorasyonlar, kesimi yapılmış, diş yapısının tamamIanmasında fonksiyon, rahatlık ve estetik açıdan yarar sağlamaktadır. Otopoİimerizan akrilik rezinler. geçici rcsUsrasyonların yapımında daha fazla kullanılan materyallerdendir. Hu çalışmada iki geç i d proletik akrilik rezîn maLeryulinin (Dcntalon Plus-Gcrmaııv), (T e indent-Germany) trans vers dayanıklılığı ve mıkroscrlligi değerlendiril iniştir. Örneklerin hazırlanmasında 65x20?;^ mm boyutlarındaki çelik kalıp kullanıldı. Örnekler kalıptan çıkarıldıktan sonra Iraıısvcrs dayanıklılık ve mikro sertlik testine tabii tutııldu. Bu testlerin sonucunda Dcntalon Plus ve Temdent ürünleri arasında transvers dayanıklılık ve mıkrosertlik açısından önemli farklılıklar bulundu.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-iki-farkli-sabit-gecici-akrilik-restorasyon-materyalinin-transvers-dayanikliliginin-mikroserti-iginin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 1
22-25
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

I. Akçaboy C . Sabit Protezlerde Başarısızlık Nedenleri. Ankara: Türk Dişhekimlcri Vakfı, 1 996.
2 Dale
B G, Aschcim K \V. Hsthetic Dentistry, İjea and r-ebiger.London 1993
3. Duız-Arnold AM, Dunne JT, Jones Al I: Micmhardness of provisional fixed prosthodonLic materials. J Prostlict, Dcnl 82: 525-528,1999.
4. Dykema R W. Goodacre C J, Phillips R W . Johnston's Modern Practice in Fixed Prosthodontic Fourth Fd . W.B. Saunders Co. Philadelphia 1986.
5. Cnilindo D, Soltys J L, Gmser G N. Long-term reinforced fixed provisional restorations. J Prosthel Dent, 79:698-701, 1998.
6. Geagauf AG, Wilkerson TJ . Fracture toughness testing of visible light-and chemical-initialed provisional restoration resin.Int J ProsthodoiU. 8:62-8,1 995
7. Grundy JRJones JG. A Color Alias of Clinical Operative Dentistry. Crowns and Bridges. 2. Ed. Wolle Publishing Ltd. London, 1993.
8. Ireland M F. Dixon D L, Breeding L C, Ramp M I I. In vitro mechanical property comparlsion of lour resins used for fabrication of provisional fixed restorations. J Prosiliet D13. Lcpc X, Bales DJ, Johnson GH. Retention of provisional crowns fabricated from two materials with the use of four temporary cements. J ProslbeL. Dent 81:469-475,1999,
14. Lulhard R G, Stöbel M, Ftinz M, Vollandt R . ClinicaJ performance and periodontal outcome of temporary crowns and fiixed partial dentures : A randomized clinical trial . J Prostlict dent. 83:32-39.2000.
15. Ogavva T, Aizawa S, Tauaka M, Matsnya S, Hasegawa A, Koyano K. Effect of water temparaturc on the fit of provisional crown margins during polivmerization. .1 Proshct Dent, »2:658-661, 1999.
16. Ogawa T, Tanaka M, Koyano K. Effect of water tcmparature during poliymerization on strength of a autopolimerlzing resin. J Proshct Dent, 84:222-224, 2000,
17. Osman Y ], Owen C P .Flexural strength of provisional restorative materials J Prosthct Dent, 70:94-96, E993
18. Park SJCrejci Hutz F . Hardness of celluloid strip-finished or polished composite surfaces wilh lime . J Prostlict Dent#3:660-663,2000
19. Ramos Vf Runyitn D A, Cristensen L C. The effect of plasma-treated polyethylene fiber on the fracture strength of the polvnicthyl mcthacrylale. J IVoslhet Dent, 76:94-96,19%.
20. Rosenthal S F, Land M F, Fuji molt) J . Contemporary Fixed Proslhodonlics.,2 nd. Ed. St Louis Mosby Year Book,1995.
2L Seolü R, Mitseellani S C, Forniti F. The in vitro color stability of acrvlie resins for provisional restorations, tut .1 Prtoshodont, 10:164 168,1997.
22. Shilingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitselt LD . Fun dam en tali s of Fixed ProsthodonLics, Third Fd. Quintessence Publishing, Chicago: 198!.
23.
Yîivuzyılma
z H.Metal Destekli Ksletik (Veneer-Kaplama) Kronlar. 2. Baskı. G.tJ İletişim Fakültesi Basımevi Ankara. 1996.
24. Young HM, Smith C T. Morton D M. Comparative m vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials . J Prosthct Dcnt,85: 125-132,2001.ent, 80: E 58-162, 1 998.
9. Jackson AD, Butler CJ. Fabrication of a new crown and provisional to an existing removable partial denture. J Prosthcr. Dent. 4:200-204,1995.
10. Jui J L, Sctcos .1 C, Phillips R W. Temporary Restorations: A review. Operative Dent. 11:103-110, 1986.
II. Lang R, RosentritL M,Leibrock A, Belir M, Handel G. Colour stability of provisional crown and bridge restoration materials, Br Dent. 185:468-467. 1988.
12. Larson W R, Dixon D L.Aquilli. S A, Clancy .1 M. The effect of carbon graphite fiber reinforcement on the strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins. J Prophet Dent, 66: 816-820,1991.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com