1.
Alaça
m T. Endodonti. 2. Baskı, Ankara, 2000; 216-2192. Altshull .111, Marshall G. Morgan LA. Raumgartner JC. Comparision of Dentinal Crack Incidence and Removal Time Resulting from Post Removal by Ultrasonic or Mechanical Force. J Hndodon 1997; 23; 683-686
3. Atalay R.
Eğr
i Kanallarda Farklı Preperasyoıı Tekniklerinin Değerlendirilmesi ile İlgili Bir Arattırma. Doktora Tc/Çalışması. 1994
4. Baker MC, Ashrafı SH, Van Cura, Remeikis JH. Ultrasonic Compared with Hand Instrumentation; A Scanning Electron Microscope Study. J Endodon 1988; 14: 435-440
5. Beling KL, Marshall JG, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. Evaluation lor Cracks Associated with Ultrasonic Root-End Preperation of Gutta-Percha Filled Canals. J Endodon 1997; 23; 323-326
6. Bertolotti R, Laomanen H. Bite-formed Posterior Resin Composite Restorations, Placed with a Self-Etching lYimer and a Novel Matrix. Quint In! 1999; 30; 419-22
7. Brent PD. Morgan LA, Marshall JG, Baumgartner JC, Evaluation of Diamond Coated Ultrasonic Instruments for Root-End Prcpcration. J Hndodon 1999; 25: 672-676
8. Buancristani J, Bradley (j, Caputo A. ^valuation ot Ultrasonic and Sonic Instruments lor '[ n trad i c ular Post Removal. J Hndodon 1994:20:486-489
9. Cameron CA. I he Use of Ultrasound in The Cleaning of Root Canals: A Clinical Report. .1 Hndodon
1982;8:472-474
10. Che nail BL, Teplitsky PE. Rndosonie.s Curbed Rool Canals. J Endodon 1985; 1 I: 369-374
11. Christensen G. Amalgam vs. Composite Resin: J A DA 1998; 129: 1757-59
12. iXimmer PM, Alodch MH. Döller R. Shaping of SimuMed Root Canals in Resin Blocks Using Files Activated by a Sonic Handpiece. Int Hndodon 1989; 22: 211-5
13- Ehriich E, Bayer YS, Hicks MC, Pellcv GB. Effects of Sonic Instrumentation on the Apical Prcpcration of Curved Canals. I Endodon 1989; İS: 200-?
]4. Glickman I . Clinical Penodontology, 7. baskı, USA. 1990; 603-607
15- Hasse L. An Innovative Approoich to ("lass II Prcpcration and Restoration. Signature, Spring Edition 1998; 16-8
16. Hugo B. Slassinakis A. Preperation and Restoration of Small Inlerpraksimal Carious Lesions with Sonic Instruments PracL Periodonl Aeslhel Dent 1998: 10: 353-359
17. Hull B, John V. Non-DcsLruclive testing. 1. Baskı, I Ion- Kong. 1988: 57-63
18. Jordan R, Suzuki M. Posterior Composite Restorations. JADA 1991; 122:31-37
19. Kielt LW, Montgomery S. The Hfleet of Endosonic Instrumentation in Simulated Curved Root Canals J Endodon 1987: 13:215-9
20. Koczorski J, Mitehull AI,. Direct Inlcy Restorations; Utilization of Sonic Preperation Technology in Conjunction with Ceramic Inserts. Praet Pcriodont Aesthet Dent 1999; IH67-73
21. Langeland K, Ciao K, Pascon HA. Work-Savirig Devices in Endodontics: Efficacy of Sonic and Ultrasonic Techniques. J Endodon 1985; 11:499-51022
Leinfelde
r KK A Conscvativc Approch la placing Posterim Composite Resin Restorations. JADA 1996, 127: 743-48
23. Eicnbcrg H. Sonic Approx: An Innovative Addition to the Restorative Continuum, I "rati PcriodoM Acsthct Dent 1998; 10: 913-922
24. Loushine R.I, Wdler HN, Hartwcl GR. Stcrcomicroscopic Evaluation of tana! Shape Following Hand, Sonic, and Ultrasonic Instrumentation. J Endodon 1989; 15: 417-21
25. Luiten D.I, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG, A Comparision of Instrumentation Techniques on Apical Canal Transportation. .1 hndodon 1995; 21: 26-32
26. Mara JBC. Carda so PE, Ball ester RY. Microleakage of Class II Restoration Using Patterned Porcelain Inserts, J Dent Res 2000; 79: 369
27. Martın H. Ultrasonic Disinfection ol' the Root Canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1 976; 42: 92-97
28. Mehloff L>S, Marshall JG, Baumgartner ,1C. Comparision of Ultrasonic and High-speed Bur Root-end Preperations Using Bilaterally Matched Teath. J hndodon 3997; 23: 448-452
29. Rainwater A, Jcansonne BG. Sarkar N. Effects of Ultrasonic Root-End Preperation on Mictocrack Formation and Lcakege. J Endodon 20(10; 26: 72-75
30. Richman MT. The Use of Ultrasonics in Root Canal Therapy arid Root Resection. J Dent Med 1957; 12: 12-18
31. Scticn VJ, Denehy C1K. Vargas MA. Cavity IVeperation Devices: Effect on Microleakage of Class If Composite. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 3 139
32. Sonicsys
Kullanı
m Kılavuzu, Kavo, 2000
33. Tang MP, Stock CJ. I he Effect ol" Hand. Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentation on (hi- Shape of Curved Root Canals. Int Endodon J 1989; 22: 55-63
34. Transtad F, Harriett h. Scht-iartibcn L, Frasea P. Effectiveness and Safely of a Sonic Vibratory Endodontic Instrument, hndodon Dent Travmaut 1985; 1: 69-76
35. Hrltti I, Bala Q, Sonicsys Appro*
Kullanımını
n Klas 11 Restorasyonların Mikrosızmîısı Üzerine Etkisi. Cîa/.i Üniversitesi Di^hckinıligi Fakültesi 2. Uluslararası Bilimsel Kongresi 20ü I; poster no;34
36. Walker TL. Del Rio O. Histological Evaluation of Ultrasonic and Sonic Instrumentation of Curved Root Canals. J Endodon 1989, 15: 49 59
37. Weller RN, Brody JM, Bemier WE. Efficacy of Ultrasonic Cleaning. J Endodon 1985; II: 369-374
38. Wilson NHP, Dunne SM, Uainsfbrt ID. Current Materials and Techniques for Direct Restorations in Posterior "fecth. Part 2: Resin Coraposit Systems. Int Dent J 1997:47: 185-93
39. Wilson NHF, Wilson M, Smith GA. A Clinical Trial of a Visible Light Cured Posterior Composite Resin Restorative Material: Four-Year Results. Quint. Int 1998; 19: 133-39
40. Yahya AS, El Dceb ME. Effect ol" Sonic Versus Ultrasonic Instrumentation on Canal Preperaiion. .1 Endodon 1989; 15:235-9
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com