Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

DÎŞHEKİMLİĞÎNDE GÖRÜNMEYEN TEHLIKE: LATEKS

INVISIBLE DANGER IN DENTISTRY: LATEX

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2003-2004

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The use of gloves as a physical barrier against physical, chemical or biological contamination of the hands has achieved universal acceptance by health care workers. Oloves are now Worn routinely by most general dental practitioners and dental students while treating patients, with latex being the most commonly used glove material. Latex proteins have been shown to be potent allergens, which elicit an TgE response in certain individuals; the most common routes of exposure include inhalation and absorption through the skin. The purposes of this article are to review the latex manufacturing process, pathogenesis of hypersensitivity reactions to latex, spectrum of reactions lo latex gloves, epidemiology and aetiology of hypersensitivity reactions to latex, lo suggest diagnosis and treatment protocols for the management of patients with latex allergy, and lo discuss Universal Precaution strategics to accommodate the lalex-allergic health care worker.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Ellerin fiziksel, kimyasal ve biyolojik kontami-nasyonuna karşı fiziksel bir bariyer olarak cldivenJerin kullanımı, sağlık alanında çalışanlar tarafından yaygın olarak kabul görmüştür. Diş hekimleri ve diş hekimliği öğrencileri tarafından hasta Ledavisinde rutin olarak kullanılan eldivenlerde, lateks yaygın bir şekilde eldiven materyali olarak kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. înhalasyon ve deri aracılığı ile absorbsiyonu en yaygın etkilenme yolları olan vc bazı bireylerde IgE cevabı şeklinde ortaya çıkan lateks proteinleri güçlü allerjenlcr olarak görülmektedir. Bu makalenin amacı, latekse ( Natural Rubber Latex ) karşı aşırı duyarlılık reaksiyonunun patogenezi, lateks eldivenlere karşı oluşan reaksiyon tipleri, latekse karsı aşırı duyarlılık reaksiyonlarının epidcmıyolojisi ve etyolojisini derlemek, lateks alerjisi olan hastaların teşhis ve tedavi prosedürlerini ortaya koymak ve lateks alerjisi olan sağlık çalışanlarında genel önlem stratejilerini tartışmaktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-dishekimliginde-gorunmeyen-tehlike-lateks.pdf
  • 3-1
29-38
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Amin A, Pelcndik CI, Cheung SW, Burke KIT. Latex exposure and allergy: a survey of general dental practitioners anddentaJ students, lnt Dent J. 1998;48:77-83
2. Gonzales E, Naleway C. Assesment of the effectiveness of glove use as a barrier technique in the dental operatory. J Am Dent Assoc. 19S8;117:467-79
3. Berky ZT, Luciano WJ, James WD. Latex glove allergy. JAMA, 1992;268:2695-7
4. Field FAV Fay MF. Issues of latex safety in dentistry. Br Dent J. 1995;179:247-53
Atatürk Üniv.Dİg Hek.Fak.Derg.
(GU:I3, Sayı:3, Cilt: 14, Sayı 1), Sayik29-38,2003-2004
GÜLER, KÖPRÜLÜ, LRKAN, GÜLER
5. Spina AM. Lev ine HJ. Latex Allergy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 1999;87:5-11
6. Nutter AF. Contact urticaria to. rubber. Br J Dermatol 1979;101:597-8
7. Sussman GL, Beczhold DA. Allergy to latex rubber. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:43-6
S.
Gcrchufsk
y M Issues and answer in latex sensitiv ıty. Ostomy Wound Management 1997;43:42-53
9. Vandcnplas O. Occupational asthma caused by natural rubber latex. Eur Respir J. 1995 ;8:1957-65
10. Dennifc MS, Light DR, Rubber elogation factor from Havea braziliensiü. Identification, characterization, and role in rubber biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 1989;264:18608-17
11. Lec H, Broekaert WF, Raikhel NV. Co- and post-translational processing of the hevein prcprotcin latex of the rubber tree(Havea braziliensis). J Biol Chem, 1991;24:15944-8
12. Jekel PA, Harlmann JBH, Beintma JJ. The primary structure of havamine, an enzyme with lyso/.yme/chitinasc activity from Havea braziliensis latex, EurJ-Biochem 1991;200:123-30
13. White IR. Dermatitis in rubber manufacturing industries, Dermatol Clin. 1988;18:398-400
14. Slater JE. Rubber anaphylaxis. N Engl J Med 1989;320:1126-30
15. Morales C, Bascomba A, Camera J, Sastre A. Anaphylaxis produced by rubber glove contact: case reports and immunological identification of the antigens involved. Clin Exp Allergy 1989;19:425-30
16. Turjanmaa K. Incidence of immediate allergy to latex gloves in hospital personnel. Contact Derm.
1987;17:270-5
17. Kam PC, Lec MS, Thompson JF. l^tex allergy: an emerging clinical and occupational health problem. Anesthesiology, 1997;52:570-5
18. Leynadier F\ Pecquet C, Dry J. Anaphylaxis to latex during surgery. Anesthesiology. 1989;44:547-50
19. Beezhold D, Beck W- Surgical glove powder bind latex antigens. Arch Surg. 1992;127:1354-7
20. Seaton A, Cherne B, Turnbull J. Rubber glove asthma. Br Med J. 1988;296:531-2
21 .Turjanmaa K, Reunala T, Alenius H, Brummcr-Korvenkontio H, Palosuo T. Allergens in latex surgical gloves and glove powder. Lancet. 1990;336:1588
22. Lagier F, Badicr M, Charpin D, Martigny J, VervloetD, Latex as aeroallergen. Lanset. 1990;2:516-7
23. Baur X, Jaeger D. Airborne antigens from latex gloves. Lancet. 1990;335:912
24. Jaeger D, Czuppon AB, Baur X, Latex-specific proteins causing immediate-type cunteneous, nasal, bronchial, and systemic reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992;89:759-67
25. Knudsen BB, Larsen E, Egsgaard H, Menne T. Release of thiurams and carbamates from rubber gloves. ContacDerm. 1993;28:63-9
26. Grand JBF, Davics JD, Verrier JJ. Starch dermatitis: evidence of immunogenic]ly of surgical glove powder in the guinea pig. Br J Exp Pathol. 1975;56:396-9
27. Burke FIT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW. Factors associated with skin irritation of the hand experienced by general dental practitioners. Contact Derm. 1995;32:35-8
28. Field EA, King CM. skin problems associated with routine wearing of gloves in dental practice. Br Dent J, 1990;169:281-5
29. Slater JE, Allergic reactions to natural rubber. Ann Allergy- 1992;68:203
30. Hamann CP. Natural rubber latex protein sensitivity in review. Am J Contact Demi. 1993 ;4{1)-4-21
31. Forstrom L. Contact urticaria from latex surgical gloves. Contact Derm 1980;6:33-4
32. Arellano R> Bradley J, Sussman G. Prevalence of lalex sensitization among hospital physicians occupationally exposed to latex gloves. Anesthesiology. 1992;77:905-8
33. Pecquet C, Laynadier F, Dry J. Contact urticaria and anaphylaxis to natural rubber. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990;22:631-3
34. Moncrct-Vautrin D, Bbeaudoui E, Widmer S,
i
• ^ „ı n „4-,.J.r „f ^.-1- f^t.ir, ,^
JVlOUILLOIl VJ4 GL ili. riua^urt aıy^j u" JJÜH. lavıuıo •••
natural rubber latex hypersensitivity. I Allergy Clin Immunol, 1993^68-77
35. Steelman VM. Latex allergy precaution. A research based protocol. Nurs Cliin North Am 1995;30:475-93
36. Şener O, Taskapan O, Ozanguc N. Latex allergy among operating room personnel in Turkey. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2000;!0(l):30-5
37. Van Hinxenstern J, Heese A, Koch HV, Peters KP, Hornstein OP, Frequency, spectrum and occupational relevance of type IV allergies to rubber chemicals. Contac Derm. 1998;19:362-7
37
Atatürk Üniv.Dis Hek.Fak.Dcrg,
(Cilt:13, Sayı:3,Cilt:14,Sayı 1), Sayfa:29 38.2003-2004
GÜLER, KÖPRÜLÜ, ERKAN, GÜLER
38. Yunginger JW, Jones RT, Fransway AH, Kelso JM, Warner MA, Hunt LW. Extraetable latex allergens and proteins in disposable medical gloves and other rubber products. J Allergy Clin Immonol. 1994:93:836^2
39. Woods JA, Lambert S, Platts-Mills TA, Drake DB, Edlich RF. Natural rubber latex allergy: spectrum, diagnostic approach and therapy. J Emerg Med. 1997;15:71-85
40- Hunt LW. The epidemiology of latex allergy in health care workers(editorial). Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993;117:874-5
41. Kurup VP, Kelly KJ, Turjanmaa K, Zacharisen M, Rcsnick A. Immunoglobulin E reactivity to latex Entigcns in the sera of patients from Filland and the United States, J Allergy Gin Immunol. 1993;91:241-7
42. Rudzbi E, Renbandel P, Grzwa Z. Patch tests with occupational contacts in nurses, doctors, and dentists. Contact Derm 1989;20:247-50
43. Czuppon AB, Allmcrs H, Baur X. Evaluation of diagnostic procedures in type 1 latex allergy. ACl International. 2O00;l2(3):98-lO4
44. Kelly KJ, Kurup V, Zacharisen M, Resnick A, Fink JN, Skin and serologic testing in the diagnosis of latex allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. I993;91:1140-5
45. Turjanmaa K, Rcunala T, Rasanel L. Comparison of diagnostic methods in latex surgical gluve contact urticaria. Contact Derm. 1988;19:241-7
46. Sussman GL, Beezhold DH, Perrella FW, Jones J. IgE dependent reactions to urologic catheter exlracts by skin testing in latex allergic patients. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1995;75:133-7
47. Kadambi A, Field S, Charous BL. Diagnostic testing in latex allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;99:503
48. Sicard H, Turjanmaa K, Pauloso T, Alenius Ft, Leynadier F, Autegarten JH, Andre C, Hrabına M, Tran TX. Latex allergy diagnosis: standardization of a natural rubber latex extract. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996;97:323
49. Kari O, Lauerma H, Alenius H, Pauloso T, Reunala T, Ocular challenge with natural rubber latex. J Allergy Clin Immunol. I997;99:343
50. Setlock MA, Cotter TP. [.atex allergy: failure of prophylaxis to prevent severe reactions, Anesth Analg. 1993;76:650-2
51. Venables KM. Preventing occupational asthma. Br J Ind Med. 1992;49:817-9
52. Ihre E, Zettcrstrom 0, Increase in nonspecific bronchia! responsiveness after repeated inhalation of low doses of allergen. Clin Exp Allergy. 1993;23:298-305

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com