Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

ORTODONTIK ATAÇMANLARIN YAPIŞTIRILMASINDA BİR DOKU YAPIŞTIRICISININ KULLANILMASI: BİR LABORATUAR ÇALIŞMA

THE USE OF A TISSUE ADHESIVE FOR BONDING OF ORTHODONTIC ATTACHMENTS: AN IN VITRO STUDY

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a tissue adhesive (ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate) when used for bonding of orthodontic attachments. Materials and Methods: The stainless steel buttons were bonded to 22 extracted human molar teeth according to one of the four protocols. Groups 1 and 2: Teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 30 seconds and 11 buttons were bonded with light-cured Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif, USA) and 11 buttons with the tissue adhesive (EPIGLU, Meyer-Haake, Wehrheim, Germany), respectively. Groups 3 and 4: Teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 5 seconds and the same numbers of buttons were also bonded with Transbond XT and the tissue adhesive. A universal test machine was used for measurements of in vitro shear bond strengths. Results: Analysis of variance showed significant differences between the mean shear bond strengths of the groups at the P < .001 level of significance. Group 4 showed significantly lower bond strength values than the other three groups. The Adhesive Remnant Index scores indicated that the tissue adhesive groups predominantly failed at the enamel-adhesive interface, whereas the failure site was frequently at the bracket-adhesive interface for the composite resin. Conclusion: Although the tissue adhesive is not a suitable bonding material for routine orthodontic practice, its potential for use as a bonding agent on impacted teeth could be improved.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, bir doku yapıştırıcının (etil-2 siyanoakrilat) ortodontik ataçmanların yapıştırılması için kullanıldığındaki etkinliğini araştırmaktır. Materyal ve Yöntem: Dört protokolden birine uygun olacak şekilde paslanmaz çelik butonlar, 22 adet çekilmiş yirmi yaş dişine yapıştırıldı. Grup 1 ve 2: Dişler 30 saniye % 37'lik fosforik asit ile pürüzlendirilerek 11 buton ışıkla sertleşen Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif., Amerika) ile ve 11 buton doku yapıştırıcısı (EPIGLU, Meyer-Haake, Wehrheim, Almanya) ile yapıştırıldı. Grup 3 ve 4: Dişler 5 saniye % 37'lik fosforik asit ile pürüzlendirildi ve aynı sayıda buton Transbond XT ve doku yapıştırıcısı ile yapıştırıldı. Bağlanma dayanımlarını ölçmek için Universal test cihazı kullanıldı. Bulgular: Grupların ortalama bağlanma dayanımları arasında varyans analizi P < .001 önem seviyesinde anlamlı farklar gösterdi. Grup 4, diğer üç gruptan anlamlı derecede düşük bağlanma dayanım değerleri gösterdi. Adhesive Remnant Index Skorları (ARI), doku yapıştırıcı grupta ağırlıklı olarak mine-yapıştırıcı ara yüzeyinde iken kompozit rezinler için başarısız alan sıklıkla buton-yapıştırıcı ara yüzeyiydi. Sonuç: Doku yapıştırıcılar, rutin ortodonti pratiği için uygun bir yapıştırıcı materyali olmamasına rağmen gömülü dişlerde yapıştırıcı ajan olarak kullanılma potansiyeli geliştirilebilir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ortodontik-atacmanlarin-yapistirilmasinda-bir-doku-yapistiricisinin-kullanilmasi-bir-laboratuar-calisma.pdf
  • 3
213-218
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Reddy L, Marker VA, Ellis E. Bond strength for orthodontic brackets contaminated by blood: composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(2):206-
213.
2. Moretti Neto RT, Mello I, Moretti AB, Robazza CR, Pereira AA.
I
n vivo qualitative analysis of the biocompatibility of different cyanoacrylate-based adhesives. Braz Oral Res. 2008; 22(1):43-47.
3. Le PT, Weinstein M, Borislow AJ, Braitman LE. Bond failure and decalcification: A comparison of a cyanoacrylate and a composite resin bonding system in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2003;123(6):624-627.
4. Coover HW, Joyner FB, Shearer NH, Wicker TH. Chemistry and performance of Cyanoacrylate adhesives. J Soc Plast Eng. 1959;15:413-417.
5. Leqqat PA, Kedjarune U, Smith DR. Toxicity of Cyanoacrylate adhesives and their occupational impacts for dental staff. Ind Health 2004;42(2):207-211.
6. Ardis AE. US patent nos. 2467926 and 2467927, 1949.
7. Papatheofanis FJ, Barmada R. The principles and applications of surgical adhesives. Surg Annu. 1993;25(1):49-81.
8.
Yavu
z SŞ, Kaplan M, Kut MS, Demirtaş MM. Kardiyovasküler cerrahide doku yapıştırıcı olarak kullanılan etil-2-siyanoakrilatın antibakteriyel etkinliğinin ve mikrobiyal kontaminasyon riskinin
216
Atatürk
Univ
. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni
Cilt:21, Sayı: 3, Yıl: 2011, Sayfa: 213-218
ARICI, ŞENER, BEREKET, ARICI
araştırılması. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cer Derg. 2003;11:141-146.
9. Eng J, Sabanathan S. Succesfull closure of bronchopleural fistula with adhesive tissue. Case report. Scand J Thorac cardiovascular Surg.
1990;24(2):157-159.
10. Akahoshi T, Hashizume M, Shimabukuro R,Tanoue K, Tomikawa M, Okita K, Gotoh N, Konishi K, Tsutsumi N, Sugimachi K. Long term results of endoscopic histoacryl injection sclerotherapy for gastric variceal bleeding: a 10 year experience. Surgery 2002;131:176-181.
11. Aytekin C, Ustündağ Y, Fırat A, Boyvat F, Ağıldere AM. Tract embolization with histoacryl and gel form after percutaneous hepatobiliary interventions in patients with ascites. Akademik Gastroent Derg. 2003;2(2):80-83.
12. Bromberg NM. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive for treatment of refractory corneal ulceration. Vet
Ophthalmol. 2002;5(1):55-60.
13. Mirzahi S, Bickel A, Ben-Layish E. Use of tissue adhesives in repair of lacerations in children. J
Pediatr Surg. 1988;23(4):312-313.
14. Chatziioannou A, Mourikis D, Kalaboukas K, Ladopoulos CH, Magoufis G, Primetis E, Katsenis K, Vlahos L. Endovascular treatment of renal arteriovenous malformations. Urol Int.
2005;74(1):89-91.
15. Yılmaz C, Kuyurtar F. Fixation of a talar-osteocondral fracture with cyanoacrylate glue. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(8):1009.
16. Eaglestein WH, Sullivan T. Cyanoacrylates for skin closure. Dermatol Clin. 2005;23(2):193-198.
17. Dabb RW, Gaffield JW, Camp LA. Use of
cyanoacrylate (superglue) for the fixation and prefabrication of nasal cartilage grafts. Aesthet
Surg. J. 2001;21(4):328-333.
18. Barbosa FI, Correa DS, Zenöbio EG, Costa FO, Shibli JA. Dimensional changes between free gingival grafts fixed with ethyl Cyanoacrylate and silk sutures. J Int Acad Periodontol.
2009;11(2):170-176.
19. Ghoreishian M, Gheisari R, Fayazi M. Tissue adhesive and suturing for closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A comparative study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108(1):14-16.
20. Albuquerque DS, Gominho LF, Dos Santos RA. Histologic evaluation of pulpotomy performed with ethyl-cyanoacrylate and calcium hydroxide.
Braz Oral Res. 2006;20(3):226-230.
21. Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF. Effects of thermocycling on the shear bond strength of a cyanoacrylate orthodontic adhesive. Am J Orthod
Dentofac Orthop. 2003;123(1):21-24.
22. Srivastava A, Gorantla S, Valiathan A. In vitro evaluation of indigenously developed cyanoacrylates as bonding agents in comparison to a conventional bonding agent. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs. 2002;16(1):25-27.
23. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ.
Effects of using a new cyanoacrylate adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2001;71(6):466-469.
24. Al-Munajed MK, Gordon PH, Mccabe JF. The use of a Cyanoacrylate adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets: an ex-vivo study. Journal of Orthodontics. 2000;27(3):255-260.
25. Mattamal GJ. Tissue adhesives in clinical medicine. 2nd ed. Hamilton, Canada: BC Decker
Inc; 2005. p.15-26.
26. Harari D, Aunni E, Gillis I, Redlich M. A new multipurpose dental adhesive for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond strength study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118(3):307-
310.
27. Meehan MP, Foley TF, Mamandras AH. A comparison of shear bond stregths of two glass ionomer cements. . Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop. 1999;115(2):125-132.
28. Ryou M,Cristopher C,Thompson C. Tissue Adhesives: A Review. Tech Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;8:33-37.
29. Carstensen W. Clinical effects of reduction of acid concentration on direct bonding of brackets.
Angle Orthod. 1993;63(3):221-224.
30. Carstensen W. Effect of reduction of phosphoric acid concentration on the shear bond strength of brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
1995;108(3):274-277.
31. Johnston CD, Hussey DL, Burden DJ. The effect of etch duration on the micro structure of molar enamel: An in vitro study. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109(5):531-534.
217
Atatürk
Univ
. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni
Cilt:21, Sayı: 3, Yıl: 2011, Sayfa: 213-218
ARICI, ŞENER, BEREKET, ARICI
32. Sheen DH, Wanq WN, Tarnq TH. Bond strength of younger and older permanent teeth with Various etching times. Angle Orthod.
1993;63(3):225-230.
33. Bin Abdullah M, Rock WP. The effect of etch time and debond interval upon the shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets. Br J
Orthod. 1996;23(2):121-124.
34. Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Scribante A, Klersy C. Plasma arc versus halogen light curing of orthodontic brackets: a 12-month clinical study of bond failures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop. 2004;125(3):342-347.
35. Menq CL, Wanq WN, Yeh IS. Fluoridated etching on orthodontic bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop. 1997;112(3):259-262.
36. Olsen ME, Bishara SE, Boyer DB, Jacobsen JR. Effect of varying etching times on the bond strength of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109(4):403-409.
37. Sunna S, Rock WP. Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Orthod.
1998;25(4):283-287.
38. Powers JM, Messersmith ML. Enemal etching and bond strength. In:Orthodontic Materials. Scientific and Clinical Aspects, Brantley WA; Eliades T (eds.), Thieme, Sttuttgart, New York,
2001;105-122.
39. Zachrisson BU. Orthodontic bonding to artificial tooth surfaces: clinical versus laboratory findings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2000;117(5):592-594.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com