Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

YAPIŞTIRMA KUVVETİNİN SİMAN FİLM KALINLIĞINA ETKİSİ

THE EFFECT OF SEATING FORCE ON THE CEMENT FİLM THICKNESS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1996

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study four different cement glass ionomer, poly carboksi late, dual cement, zinc phosphalet were used as luting agent. The effect of sealing force on the cement film îhiekness was evaluated with mini test 4000 and the findings were statistically analyzed. While glass ionomer has the last the dual cement showed the most cement film thickness.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada 4 farklı yapıştırıcı siman alarak glass iyooomer.polikarboksjlat.dual ve çinko fosfat kullanıldı. Bunların yapıştırma kuvveti kargısında oluşturduğu film kalınlığı mini test 4000 cihazı ile araştırılmış ve bulgıdar istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmiştir. En az film knhflllgir» glass iyonomer, en fazla film kalınlığını dual siman du$tuımu|tur
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-yapistirma-kuvvetinin-siman-film-kalinligina-etkisi.pdf
  • 2
40-43
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Cardesh HS, Baharav H, Pilo R, Benamar A. The effect porcelain color on the hardnes of luting composite resin cement. J Pro&thet Dent 1993; 69: 620-3.
2. Craig RG, Restoratif Dental Material 9 ed. CV MosbyCoStLouis, 1993.
3. Eames WP, O'Neal S J. MonterioJ, Miler C, Roan IP, Cohen KS. Techniques to improve the seating of casting, J Am Dent Assoc 1978; 96: 432-7.
4. Frajıçois M. Le scelletnent des protheses fixe. Rev Beige Med Dent 1979; 34: 255-66.
5. Grieve AR. A study of dental cements. Br Dent J 1969; 4:405-9.
6. Hosegawa EA, Bayer DB, Chan DCN. Hardering of dual cement under composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 55:187-92.
7. Inokoshi S, Williems G, Meerbeek V, Lambrechts P^Bream M, Vanherle G. Dual cure luting composites. Part Î: fillerptasticle destribuüon. J Oral Ren 1993; 20: 133^46.
8. Lewin WA. An evaluation of the film thickness of . iwmlitfing agents. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62; 175-8,
9. Meerbeek V, Inokoshi S, Daulsojı CL, De Gee AJ, l^brechts P„ Bream M, Vanherle G. Dual cure luting OOOtpositeü part II clinically reated properties, J Oral Reh m&i 21:57-66.
16. Mitra SB, Adhesion to denlin and physical prbfrntK* at a light cured glass ionomer liner/base. J Dent fee* 1991; 7ft 72-4.
11. Powers JMt Johnson ZG, Graif RG. Phsical and mmhıırrimi piopcrtiun of zinc/ polycorboxlate dental Otom. J Am Dent Assoc 1974; 99: 380-3.
12. Smith DC. A new dental cement. Br Dent J 1MB; 12S: 381-92,
13. White SN, Sorensen JA, Kaıig SK,f.'aputo AA. ' MNsetadrj^e - of new crown end fixed partial denture
Ja^igeBts. J Prosthet Deri t. 1992; 67:156,60.
14. White SN, Yu Z, Kipnis V. Effect of scaling fere* W film thickness of new adhesive luting agents. J
i
ftaSf^Deot 1992; 68:476-81.
15. White SN. Kipnis V. Effect of adhesiv luting matt on the marginal seating of cast restorasyon. J Pntfliet Dent 1993; 69:28-31.
16. White SN. Yu Z. The effect of adhesive luling ajn& dentin surface interactions on film thickness. J Jfe^het Dent 1992; 68:49-52.
U: 17. Wang GWillstein PL, Nathanson D. Effect of t&aaAr cement space, marginal desing, seating aid xMPficU, and seeling force on crown cementation J Fjfcf^ 1992; 67:786-90.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com