Buradasınız

Kaynak Tanımlama ve Erişim’in (RDA) Gelişimi: Yeni Kataloglama Standardı

Development of Resource Description and Access (RDA): The New Cataloging Standard

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Resource Description and Access (RDA) is a new standard for describing and accessing information specifically designed for the digital environment. It is a shift from Anglo American Cataloging Rules II (AACR2) and it aims to provide a more user friendly service to library users in locating information in the library online catalogs. It is also targeting to facilitate a cataloging standard which can be shared globally and be edited simultaneously by the catalogers and other users when needed. There are similarities as well as diff erences between these two cataloging standards. Since the development of RDA started in 2005, there has been a hot discussion among catalogers about the advantages and disadvantages of the two standards against each other. There are also arguments on the changes that RDA would introduce to the cataloging standards and questioning if this is the right time to move forward with these changes. This paper provides the reader an overview of the development of RDA standards and the outcome of this new standard yet to be adopted.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Kaynak Tanımlama ve Erişim (Resource Description and Access - RDA) özellikle dijital ortam için tasarlanmış bilgiyi tanımlamaya ve bu bilgiye erişmeye yönelik bir standarttır. Bu standart Anglo Amerikan Kataloglama Kuralları 2’den türemiştir ve kütüphane kullanıcılarına çevrimiçi kütüphane kataloglarında bilginin yerini belirlemek için daha fazla kullanıcı dostu hizmetler sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca gereksinim duyulduğunda katalogcular ve diğer kullanıcılar tarafından eş zamanlı olarak düzenlenebilen ve dünya çapında paylaşılabilen bir kataloglama standardı oluşturabilmeyi hedefl emektedir. İki kataloglama standardı arasında farklılıklar olduğu kadar benzerlikler de bulunmaktadır. RDA standardının 2005 yılından itibaren gelişmeye başlaması, katalogcuların her iki standardın birbirine karşı avantajları ve dezavantajları üzerinde tartışmalarını beraberinde getirmiştir. Ayrıca RDA’nın kataloglama standartlarına getireceği değişiklikler, bu değişikler için doğru bir zamanlama olup olmadığı ve bu değişikliklerle ilerlemenin mümkün olup olmayacağı konularında tartışmalar bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, okuyuculara RDA standardının gelişimi ve henüz yeni benimsenmiş bu standardın çıktıları hakkında genel bir bakış sunmaktadır.
397-417

REFERENCES

References: 

Bai, H., Qiao, X. & Liang, B. (2011). Semantic bibliography based on ontology and Linked Data.
In Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, (DC-
2011--The Hague Proceedings), (pp.178-181). Retrieved March 3, 2012, from http://dcpapers.
dublincore.org/index.php/pubs/article/view/3641/1867
Bowen, J. & Lindahl, D. (2011, April 8). RDA and the eXtensible Catalog. Retrieved November 22,
2011, from http://hdl.handle.net/1802/14588
Chapman, A. (2006, October). RDA: A new international standard. Ariadne, 49. Retrieved November
22, 2011, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue49/chapman
Coyle, K. & Hillman, D. (2007, January/February). Resource Description and Access (RDA):
Cataloging rules for the 20th century. D-Lib Magazine, 13(1/2).
Cronin, C. (2011, September 27). RDA update and next steps: What you need to know.
Retrieved August 21, 2012, from http://www.oclc.org/ca/fr/multimedia/2011/fi les/
GoodPracticesChicagoCronin.pdf
Gorman, M. (2007). RDA: Imminent Debacle. American Libraries, 38(11), 64-65.
Hennelly, J. (2011, November 8). RDA Toolkit blog: RDA Toolkit release- November 8, 2011 [Web log
post]. Retrieved December 26, 2011, from http://www.rdatoolkit.org/content/274
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). (2012). Functional
Requirements for Authority Data: A conceptual model. [IFLA series on bibliographic control 34,
by G. E. Patton (Ed.)]. Retrieved August 16, 2012, from http://www.ifl a.org/publications/ifl aseries-
on-bibliographic-control-34
Joint Steering Committee for development of RDA (JSC). (2010). RDA: Resource Description and
Access- Frequently Asked Questions, 9. Adopting RDA- 9.2. Retrieved August 20, 2012, from
http://www.rda-jsc.org/rdafaq.html#9-2
Joint Steering Committee for development of RDA (JSC). (2012). JSC membership 1974 - . Retrieved
August 20, 2012, from http://www.rda-jsc.org/jscmembers.html
Joint Steering Committee for development of RDA (JSC). (2012). RDA: Resource Description
and Access-Background. Retrieved August 16, 2012, from http://www.rda-jsc.org/rda.
html#background
Kiorgaard, D. (2005). RDA: Resource Description and Access Part I of RDA- Constituency review
of December 2005 draft (Joint Steering Committee for revision of AACR, 5JSC/RDA/Part I).
Retrieved January 20, 2012, from http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/5rda-part1.pdf
Lewis, P. R. (1978). Preface to the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, Second Edition (1978). Retrieved
August 16, 2012, from http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/aacr2preface1978.pdf
Library of Congress (LC). (1998). MARC 21: Harmonized USMARC and CAN/MARC. Retrieved March
10, 2012, from http://www.loc.gov/marc/annmarc21.html
Library of Congress (LC). (2008). On the record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group
on the Future of Bibliographic Control. Retrieved March 3, 2012, from http://www.loc.gov/
bibliographic-future/news/lcwg-ontherecord-jan08-fi nal.pdf
Library of Congress (LC). (2011). Report and recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating
Committee: 9 May 2011 revised for public release 20 June 2011. Retrieved February 15, 2012, from
http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/source/rdatesting-fi nalreport-20june2011.pdf
Library of Congress (LC). (2011). Report on the RDA/MARC Working Group discussion of identifying
entity types in MARC records. Retrieved August 21, 2012, from http://www.loc.gov/marc/
marbi/WEMI_report.html
Library of Congress (LC). (2012). U.S. RDA implementation updates from the U.S. RDA Test
Coordinating Committee. Retrieved February 28, 2012, from http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/pdf/
RDA_updates_16jan12.pdf
Library of Congress (LC). (2012). Library of Congress announces its long-range RDA training plan.
Retrieved March 2, 2012, from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/news_rda_implementation_
date.html
Library of Congress (LC). (2012). Program for Cooperative Cataloging: What’s new, decisions, policies
and tasks- PCC day one for RDA authority records. Retrieved August 23, 2012, from http://www.
loc.gov/aba/pcc
Maliaburton. (2010). Learning about RDA, The future of bibliographic control: Data infrastructure
[Web log post]. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://Learningaboutrda.wordpress.com
Maxwell, R. L. (2012). Maxwell’s handbook for RDA: Explaining and illustrating RDA, Resource
description and access, using MARC21. Chicago, Illinois: American Library Association.
McCallum, S. H. (2005). Using MARC 21 with FRBR: Record confi gurations. Retrieved August 21, 2012,
from http://www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/2005/2005-report02.pdf
Medeiros, N. (2005). The future of the Anglo American Cataloging Rules. OCLC Systems & Services
21(4), 261-63.
Oliver, C. (2011). Preparing for transition: Here comes RDA!. Retrieved August 25, 2012, from http://
www.rda-jsc.org/docs/CLA2011-Preparing-for-transition-Oliver.pdf
Online Computer Library Center (OCLC). (2011). OCLC policy statement on RDA cataloging in
WorldCat for the U.S. testing period and beyond. Retrieved August 22, 2012, from http://www.
oclc.org/rda/policy.htm
Scottish Library and Information Council and European RDA Interest Group (SLIC & EURIG). (2011).
European RDA Interest Group: Documents. Retrieved February 28, 2012, from http://www.
slainte.org.uk/eurig/documents.htm
Seikel, M. & Steele, T. (2011). How MARC has changed: The history of the format and its forthcoming
relationship to RDA. Technical Services Quarterly, 28(3), 322-334.
Spero, S. (2012). RDA-L, LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Library and Archives Canada - Bibliotheque et
Archives Canada. Retrieved May 18, 2012, http://www.lsoft.com/scripts/wl.exe?SL1=RDAL&
H=LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Spicher, K. M. (1996). The development of the MARC format. Cataloging & Classifi cation Quarterly,
21(3-4), 75-90.
Suber, P. (2004). A very brief introduction to Open Access. Retrieved November 28, 2011, from http://
www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/brief.htm
Tillett, B. (2003). FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records). Technicalities, 23(5),
1-13.
Tillett, B. & Patton, G. (2008). A review of the feasibility of an International Standard Authority
Data Number (ISADN). Retrieved August 16, 2012, from http://archive.ifl a.org/VII/d4/franarnumbering-
paper.pdf

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com