Buradasınız

CİNSİYET VE DİL

GENDER AND LANGUAGE

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this review study, the differences between women and men in language learning and acqusition process are examined from different perspectives as sex-based or gender-based theoretically. Basic definitions related to gender and sex in literature review have been presented and discussed by dealing with the findings of various researches. Afterwards, the studies carried out on sex-based differences have been investigated to explain why males and females think and learn differently. On this direction it is discussed how sex-role sterotyping and gender bias begin and develop. In addition, it is mentioned the relationship between language and gender. Finally in this study the effects of sex and gender on first language acquisition and second language acquisiton are defined.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Derleme türü bu çalışmada dil öğrenme ve edinme sürecinde kadın ve erkek arasındaki en önemli farklılıklardan biri kabul edilen cinsiyet faktörü sosyal veya biyolojik temelli olarak iki farklı bakış açısıyla kuramsal olarak ele alınmıştır. Araştırmada öncelikle cinsiyet kavramının alan yazınla ilgili bilimsel çalışmalarda yer alan biyolojik (male-female) ve sosyal (feminine-masculine) açıdan tanımları verilmiştir. Daha sonra kadın ve erkeğin biyolojik temelde farklı bilim alanlarında farklı düşünüp öğrenmeleri ile ilgili araştırmalara yer verilmiştir. Bu bağlamda biyolojik temelli cinsiyet rol ve sosyal temelli cinsiyet önyargılarının nasıl başlayıp geliştiği tartışılmıştır. Ayrıca bu çalışmada dil ve cinsiyetin sosyal yönü arasındaki ilişki üzerinde durulmuştur. Son olarak ana dil ve ikinci dil ediniminde cinsiyetin sosyal ve biyolojik temelleri tartışılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
459-471

REFERENCES

References: 

AGNIHOTRI, R.K. (1979). Process of assimilation: sociolinguistic
study of Sikh children in Leeds. Unpublished DPhil thesis. In Khanna, A. L.,
Verma, M.K., Agnihotri, R.K. and Sinha, S. K. Adult ESOL Learners in
Britain: A Cross-Cultural Study . University of York: York.
BACON, S. M. C. & Finnemann, M. (1992). Sex differences in selfreported
beliefs about foreign language learning and authentic oral and written
input. Language Learning, 42, 471-495.
BARON-COHEN, S. (2003) The Essential Difference, London: Allen
Lane.
BAXTER, S. (1994). The last word on gender differences. Psychology
Today, 86,50-53.
BERGWALL, V. L. (1999). Towards a Comprehensible Theory and
Gender. Language and Society, 28, 273-293.
Celal Bayar Üniversitesi
470
BIELINSKI, J. & DAVISON, M. (1998) Gender differences by item
difficulty interactions in multiple choice mathematics items. American
Educational Research Journal, 23, 425-436.
BLOCK, D. (2002). Language & Gender and SLA. [Electronic version]
Quaderns de Filologia. Estudis Linguistics. Vol VII, 49-73.
BUTLER, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of
Identity. New York and London: Routledge.
BRIZENDINE, L. (2006) The Female Brain, New York: Morgan Road.
CAMERON, D. (2000). Good to Talk? Living and Working in a
Communication Culture. London: Sage
CARR. J. & PAUWELS, A. (2006) Boys and Foreign Language
Learning: Real Boys Don’t Do Languages, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
DAVIS, K.A. & SKILTON-SYLVESTER, E. (2004). Looking back,
taking stock, moving forward: Investigating gender in TESOL. TESOL
Quarterly, 38, 381-404.
DELAMONT, S. (2002). Gender and education. In D. L. Levinson, P.
W. Coolzson, Jr., & A. R. Sadovnik (Eds.), Education and sociology: An
encyclopedia (pp. 273-279). New York: Routledge Falmer.
DOULAS, J. W. B. (1964). The Home and the School: A Study of
Ability and Attainment in the Primary School. MacGibbon & Kee: London.
ECKERT, P. , MCCONNELL-GINET, S. (1992). Think Practically and
Look Logically. Language and Gender as Community- Based Practice. Annual
Review of Antropology. 21, 461.
ELLIS, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
FAUSTO-STERLING, A. (2000). Sexing the Body: Gender Politics
and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
FEINGOLD, A. (1992). Sex differences in variability in intellectual
abilities: A new look at an old controversy. Review of Educational Research,
62, 61-84.
FENNEMA, E, CARPENTER, T. P., JACOBS, V. R., FRANKE, M.L.,
& LEVI, L. W. (1998). A longtitudinal study of gender differences in young
children’s mathematical thinking. Educational Researcher, 27(5), 4-12.
FLANAGAN, C. (1993). Gender and social class: Intersecting issues in
women's achievement. Educational Psychologist, 28, 357-378.
FOX, H. E., WHITE, S. A., KAO, M. H., & FERNALD, R. D. (1997).
Stress and dominance in a social fish. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 6463-6469.
GALLAGHER, A. M., & DELISI, R. (1994) Gender Differences in
Scholastic aptitude test: Mathematics problem solving among high ability
students. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol: 86(2), 204-211.
GIDDENS, A.(1989). Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
GRAY, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus, New
York: Harper Collins.
Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Cilt:9, Sayı:2, Ekim 2011
Prof. Dr. Mahmut Kaplan Armağan Sayısı
471
HOLMES, J & MEYERHOFF M. (1999). The Community of Practice:
Theories and Methodologies in Language and Gender Research. Language and
Society, 28, 173-183.
LABOV, W. (1991). The intersection of sex and social class in the
course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Linguistic Change, 2, 205-
254.
LEFRANCOIS, G. R. (1997). Psychology for Teaching. London:
International Thomson Publishing Europe.
LI, R. & BU, Y. (2006). On how children acquire their mother tongue:
explanation of Chomsky’s mental linguistic theory. Sino-US English Teaching,
3, 55-58.
MAHER, F. A. & WARD, J. V. (2002). Gender and Teaching.
Mahwah, Nj: Erlbaum.
MCCONNELL, S. (1988). Language and Gender. In F. J. Newmeyer
(Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Volume IV Language: The Sociocultural
Context. Cambridge University Press.
MORRIS, M. (1966). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
PONYTON, C. (1985). Language and Gender: Making the Difference.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ROSE, R., GORDON, T., & BERNSTEIN, I. (1972). Plasma
testosterone levels in the male rhesus monkeys: influences of sexual and social
stimuli. Science, 178:634--645.
SATYANATH, T. S. (1982). Kannadigas in Delhi: a sociolinguistic
study. [unpublished doctoral dissertation, Delhi: University of Delhi].
SMITH, M. L. (1991). Meanings of test preparation. American
Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 521-542.
STUMPF, H. & STANBY, J.C. (1990). Gender-related differences on
the College Board’s Advanced Placement Tests, 1982-1992, Journal of
Educational Psychology, 88(2), 353-364.
TORRANCE, E. P. (1986). Teaching creative and gifted learners. In M.
C. Wittroclr (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed. ). New York:
Macrnillan.
TRUDGILL, P. (1974). The Social Differentiation of English in
Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WARRICK, P. D. & PUGACH, M.C. (1996). Forming partnerships
around curriculum. Educational Leadership, 53(5), 62-65.
WEST, C, & ZIMMERMAN, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and
Society, 1 (2), 125-151.
WOOLFOLK, A. (1980). Educational Psychology. Boston: Pearson
Education Company.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com