Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

PYELOPLASTİ OPERASYONLARIMIZIN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Journal Name:

  • Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2000

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Totally 36 patients who had undergone pyeloplasty operation for ureteropelvic obstruction in our clinic between 1986 and 1998 were evaluated retrospectively. Results.- The mean age of these cases was 30,7 years, of which 12 were female and 24 male. Anderson Hynes technique had been undertaken in 30 patients, Foley Y-V plasty in 5, Culp DeWeered spiral flap in 1 patient. In all cases other than those who had undergone Foley Y-V plasty required nephrostomy and stend application. The development of severe wound infection requiring reoperation in 1 patient and a late fistula healing spontaneously in an other was observed. The mean duration of hospital stay was 9 days. Conclusion.- In all cases an improvement had been noted when the findings of preoperative urography were compared with those taken 3 months after the operation.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Kliniğimizde 1986-1998 yılları arasında üreteropelvik obstruksiyon saptanarak pyeloplasti operasyonu uygulanan toplam 36 olgu retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Yirmidördü erkek 12’i kadın olan olgular ın yaş ortalaması 30,7 idi.Otuz olguya Anderson-Hynes, 5 olguya Foley Y-V plasti, 1 olguya da Culp DeWeered spiral flap tekniği uygulandı. Foley Y-V plasti dışındaki tüm olgularda nefrostomi ve stent kullanıldı. Bir olguda reoperasyon gerektiren ciddi yara enfeksiyonu, bir olguda da spontan kapanangeç fistül gelişti. Hastanede kalış süresi ortalama 9 gündü. Operasyondan 3 ay sonra çekilen ürografiler ile preoperatif dönemde çekilen ürografiler karşılaştırıldığında olgular ımızın tümünde iyileşme tesbit edildi.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-pyeloplasti-operasyonlarimizin-degerlendirilmesi.pdf
  • 3
140-143
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Kogan BA. Disorders of the Ureter and Ureteropelvic
Junction. Smith’s General Urology. Edited
by EA Tanago, JW McAninch. Fourteenth
edition. Connecticut, Appleton and Lange,
1995; 626-641.
2. Bauer SB. Anomalies of the kidney and ureteropelvic
junction. Campbell’s Urology. Edited
by PC Walsh, AB Retik, ED Vaughan, AJ
Wein. 7th edition. Philadelphia, WB Saunders
Co, 1998; 1708-1775.
3. Talner LB. Specific causes of obstruction.
Clinical Urography. Edited by HM Pollack.
Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co, 1990; 56:1629-
1751.
4. Novick AC, Streem SB. Surgery of Kidney.
Campbell’s Urology. Edited by PC Walsh, AB
Retik, ED Vaughan, AJ Wein. 7th edition.
Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co, 1998; 2973-
3061.
5. DeWeerd JH. Ureteropelviplasty. Urologic
Surgery. Edited by JF Glenn.Thirtd edition.
Philadelphia, Lippincott Company, 1983; 227-
252.
6. Tunç M, Tellaloğlu S, Kadıoğlu A, Ander H,
Özsoy C, Karaman Mİ. Üreteropelvik jonktür
darlıklı 93 hastada pyeloplasti deneyimlerimiz.
Türk Üroloji Dergisi, 1993; 19: 310-316.
7. Göğüş O, Müftüoğlu YZ, Küpeli S, Şafak M,
Bedük Y, Topukçu Z, Meto S. Kliniğimizde
pyeloplasti olgularımızın analizi. Türk Üroloji
Dergisi 1989; 15: 379-384.
8. Clark WR, Malek RS. Ureteropelvic junction
Obstruction: Observation on the classic type in
adults. J Urol 1987; 138:276-279.
9. McMullin N, Khor T, King P. Internal ureteric
stending following pyeloplasty reduces length
of hospital stay in children. Br J Urol 1993; 72:
370-372.
10. Okumuş M, Demirkol I. Pyeloplasti operasyonlar
ı ve kliniğimizde elde ettiğimiz sonuçlar.
Türk Üroloji Dergisi 1990; 16: 251-254.
11. Blandy J. Operation for hydronephrosis. Operative
Urology. Second edition. Oxford, Blackwell
Scientific Publication,1986; 62-72.
12. Montague DK, Straffon RA. Renal cerrahinin
Komplikasyonları. Ürolojik cerrahinin
komplikasyonları. Edited by Smith RB,
Skinner DG, (çeviri editörü Kadri Anafarta).
Ankara, Er Ofset Basımevi, 1981; 41-66.
13. Mesrobian MGJ. Renal dynamics after pyeloplasty.
Urology 1991; 38: 242-246.
14. Mikkelsen SS, Rasmussen BS, Jensen TM,
Haughoj-Peterson W, Christensen PO. Long
term follow-up of patients with hydronephrosis
treated by Anderson Hynes pyeloplasty. Br J
Urol 1992; 79: 121-124.
15. Şimşek Ü, Kutlu S, Oktay B, Özyurt M, Ayy
ıldız A. Pyeloplastilerde üretral stend kullan
ımı. Türk Üroloji Dergisi 1992; 18: 156-159.
16. Flint LD, Libertius JA. Ureteropelvic Junction
Reconstruction. Pediatric and reconstructive
Urologic Surgery 1997; 8: 82-96.
17. Clayman RV, Basler JV, Kavoussi L, Picus
DD. Ureteronephroscopic endopyelotomy. J
Urol 1988; 144: 473-475.
18. Brannen GE, Bush WH, Lewis GP. Endopyelotomy
for primary repair of ureteropelvic
junction obstruction. J Urol 1988; 139: 29-32.
19. Badlani G, Karlin G, Smith AD. Complications
of endopyelotomy: analysis in series of 64 patients.
J Urol 1988; 140: 473-475.
20. Banerjee GK, Ahlawat R, Dalela D, Kumar
RV. Endopyelotomy and pyeloplasty:face to
face. Eur Urol 1994; 26: 281-285.
21. Nadler RB, Rao GS, Pearle MS, Nakada SY,
Clayman RV. Acucise endopyelotomy. Assesment
of long term durabiliti. J Urol 1996; 156:
1094-1098.
22. Kavoussi LR, Petrs CA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
J Urol 1993; 150: 1891-1894.
23. Schuessler WW, Gruve MT, Tecuanhuey LV,
Preminger GM. Laporoscopic dismembered
Pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993; 150: 1795-1799.
24. Recker F, Substic M, Goepel M, Tscholl R.
Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: Preliminary
report. J Urol 1995; 153: 1601-1604.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com