Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Kaynaştırma Dersi Planlamasında Öğrenci İhtiyaçlarının Belirlenmesi: İhtiyaç Temelli Ders Desenleme Hazırlığı

Determining Students’ Needs to Design Inclusion Course: Needs-based Couse Design Preparation

Journal Name:

  • Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Recent changes in teacher education program which approved by the Higher Education Council of Turkey required students of education programs in higher education to take special education course. Also, the regulation about education of the students with special needs has been changed. All students with certain disabilities are considered as subjects to be involved in inclusive education settings. Therefore, early childhood department students are offered a course titled as inclusion. However, only limited number of education colleges can provide experts on inclusion even though there are considerable amount of early childhood education departments all over the country. Thus, a need to design a course for all education colleges appeared as necessity. Since inclusion course is offered in the last semester of senior year, a course design to teach inclusion must have special features to work on. Ziegenfuss (2007) determined five major course design approaches. One of the highly preferred methods is named as needs-based course design. What makes that design is its focus on practical needs for professional future of the students. Therefore, lying on that approach to design a course seemed preferable to the researcher. In order to construct the course, the researcher started to learn about what the needs, knowledge, and expectations of the senior students of the early childhood education department.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Yükseköğretimde ders desenlemesi gerçekleştirilirken dersin amaçları olarak, dersi veren öğretim elemanının amaçlarının mı yoksa dikkat alınması gereken başka etmenler mi olduğu tartışması bir süredir devam edegelmektedir. Ders desenlemesini etkileyen etmenler arasında dersin uygulamayı etkileme düzeyine bağlı olarak öğrenci beklentilerinin de karşılanacak bir planlama yapılması uygun görünmektedir. Bu nedenle bir niteliksel çalışma olarak planlanan bu çalışmada, öğrencilerden dersin sonunda ne kazanmak istedikleri ile ilgili olarak veri toplanmıştır. Çalışma iki sene üst üste tekrarlanarak görüşme formu elden geçirilmiş ve ikinci senenin verileri sonuç bulgusu olarak esas alınmıştır. Bunun için okul öncesi öğretmenliği öğrencilerinden görüşme yoluyla veri toplanmıştır. Sonuçların analizi öğrencilerin, hedef dersin sonunda öğrencilerle çalışırken sahip olmaları gereken pratik bilgilere olan ihtiyaçlarını öne çıkarmışlardır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_115137_2_pp_73-85.pdf
  • 1
73-85
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Akerlind, C. (2003). Growing and developing as an academic: Implications for academic
development, academia and academic work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
University of Sydney, Australia.
Fink, L. D. Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing
College Courses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2003.
Gow, L. & Kember, D. (1993). „Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student
learning‟. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 20–33.
Knewstubb, B., & Bond, C. (2009). What‟s he talking about? The communicative alignment
between a teacher‟s intentions and students‟ understandings. Higher Education Research
& Development, 28, 179-193.
Martin, E., Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., Ramsden, P., & Benjamin J. (2000). What university
teachers teach and how they teach it. Instructional Science, 28, 347-412.
Nicoll-Senft, J.M. (2009). An “Extreme Makeover” of a course in special education. New
Directions for Teaching and Learning, 119, 81-88.
Norton, L., Richardson J.T.E., Hartley, J., Newstead, S., & Mayes, J. Teachers‟ beliefs and
intentions concerning teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 50, 537- 571.
Toohey, S. (1999). Designing course for higher education Buckingham, UK: SRHE Open
University Press.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., Martin, E., & Ramsden, P. (2005). University teachers‟ experience of
change in their understanding of the subject matter they have taught. Teaching in Higher
Education, 10 (2) 251-264.
Ziegenfuss, D.H. (2007). A phenomenogrphic analysis of course design in the academy. Journal
of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 2, 70-79.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com