Buradasınız

Delile Dayalılık ve Salar Türkçesinde Öge Cümlelerle Delillendirilmiş Dolaylılık

Indirectness evidenced in the Salar Turkish through Constituent Sentences

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The point that we have focused on our Studies is that evidentiality and a reference is to be made to the source of information by way of constituent sentences in the indirectness sentences in the Salar Turkish and that description of comprehension-perception process is seen grammatically. Evidentiality is a body of systems associated with various fields of linguistic, which is the universal of a language; when it is coded to the statement through lexical ways the grammatical category which is mandatory to be shown at the upper structure (at sentential plane) to the research field of the semantic however it is included in the research field of the grammatical morphology (conjugation morphology). Systemizing process of this fact however is a problematic of the grammaticality. Today representation of this linguistic universality which is an independent grammatical category in Turkish language is realized through the indirectness. In Turkish language, source of the information cannot be indicated by the pointers of indirectness and indirectness particles in sentences with single verb; only the knowledge which has been received from indirect ways is provided. Besides, in sentences of indirectness in Turkish language reference can be made to the source of information by means of constituent sentences or comprehension- perception process can be depicted. The Salar Turkish however has the competence of such grammatical statement.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çalışmamızda odaklanılan nokta delile dayalılık ve Salar Türkçesindeki dolaylılık cümlelerinde, öge cümleler yolu ile bilgi kaynağına işaret edilmesi ve bilgiyi algılama sürecinin tasvirinin gramatikal görünümüdür. Delile dayalılık linguistiğin türlü alanları ile bağlantılı bir sistemler bütünüdür, bir dil evrenselidir; ifadeye sözlüksel yollar ile kodlanması durumunda semantiğin araştırma alanına üst yapıda (cümlesel düzlemde) gösterilmesi zorunlu bir gramatikal kategori ise çekim morfolojisinin araştırma alanına girer. Bu olgunun sistemleşme süreci ise gramatikalleşmenin bir sorunsalıdır. Günümüzde bağımsız bir gramatikal kategori olan bu dil evrenselinin Türk dilindeki temsili dolaylılık ile gerçekleştirilir. Türk dilinde tek yüklemli cümlelerde dolaylılık işaretleyicileri ve dolaylılık parçacıkları ile bilginin kaynağı gösterilmez, yalnızca bilginin dolaylı yollarla alındığı, idrak edildiği bilgisi verilir. Bunun yanında Türk dilinde dolaylılık cümlelerinde öge cümleler yardımıyla bilginin kaynağına işaret edilebilir ya da algılama-idrak süreci tasvir edilebilir. Salar Türkçesi de bu gramatikal bildirim yetisine sahiptir.
67-80

REFERENCES

References: 

processes, Vol. XX, Ablex, Norwood, NJ
(1986), PP.273-312.
Comrie, Bernard (2000) ‘Evidentials: Semantic and history’, In Lars Johanson and B. Utas
(Eds). Evidentials, Turkic, İranian and Neighbouring Languages. (Editors: Lars
Johanson; Boa Utas), Mouton de Gruyter, s: 45-59
Dwyer, Arienne (2000) ‘Direct and indirect experience in Salar’, Evidentials, Turkic, İranian
and Neighbouring Languages. (Editors: Lars Johanson; Boa Utas), Mouton de Gruyter, s:
45-59
Fintel, Kai von; Gillies A. S. (2006) ‘Epistemic Modality for Dummies’ APA Eastern
Division, December 30, 2005.
Germanistische Linguistik (2009) SLE conference, The linguistic realization of evidentiality
in Europan Languages. (http://www.gabrielediewald.de/evidential-abstracts.html)
Givon, Talmy (2001) Syntax 1+ II, revised edition, Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, Benjamins.
Haan , Ferdinand de (2001) ‘The Relation Modality and Evidentiality’ In R. Müller& M. Reis
(Eds) Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen, Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 9.Hamburg: ©Helmut Buske Verlag, Hamburg (www.u.arizona.edu/~fdehaan/
pepers/1b01.pdf).
………….............. ‘Visual Evidentiality and its Origins’ (http://www.u.arizona.edu/fhaan/
papers/evid1.pdf)
………………… (1999) Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: Setting boundaries. Sautwest
Journal of Linguistic, 18, 83-101 (www.u.arizona.edu/~fdehaan/pepers/SWJL99.
pdf).
………………….. (2005) Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. In Z. Frajzyngier&D.
Rood (Eds.)Linguistic diversty and language theories. Amsterdam: (www.u.arizona.
edu/~fdehaan/pepers/boulder.pdf).
Johanson, Lars (2000) ‘Turkic indrectives’. L. Johanson&B. Utas (Eds.) Evidentials: Turkic,
Iranian and neighboring languages. Berlin: Moutonde Gruyter. pp.61-87).
……...………. (2003) ‘Evidentiality in Turkic’, Studies in Evidentiality, Typological Studies
in Language 54, s:273-290, Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Johanson, Lars&Utas B. (Eds.) (2000) Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and neighboring
languages Berlin: Moutonde Gruyter.
Jacobsen, W. H., Jr. (1986). The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah. In W. L. Chafe & J.
Nichols (Eds.) (pp. 3–28).
Kakuk S., (1961)‘Textes Salars’ Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 13: 95-
117, Budapest.
………….., (1962)‘Un vocabulair salar’, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae
15, f. 2, Budapest
………….., (1962) ‘Sur la phonetique de la langue salare, Acta Orientalia Academiae
Scientiarum Hungaricae tom. 15, f. 1-2, Budapest
Ma Wei, Ma Jianzhong, Kevin Stuart (2001) ‘The Folklore of China’s İslamic Salar
Nationality’, Edvin Melen Press: New York.
Palmer, Frank. R. (2001) Mood and Modality, Cambridge Universty Press 2 ed.
Quanlin, Ma; Wanxiang, Ma; Zhicheng Ma (1993) Salar Language Materials Sino Platonic
Papers (SPP) Number: 43 December, University of Pennsylvania USA.
Siegl, Florian (2004) The 2nd Past In The Permic Languages Form, Function, and a
ComparativeAnalysis From a Typological Perceptive, M. A. Thesis, Tartu.
Tenişev E.R. (1957) I Tyurkskih Naradov Kitaya, Naslediye
……………. (1963) Salarskiy Yazık, Yazıki zarubecnogo Vostoka i Afriki, Moskva
……………. (1964) Salarskie Teksti, Moskova
……………. (1970) ‘Zametki a Salarskoy Leksike’ Voprası Türkologiy s:165- 171
……………. (1988) Sravnitelno-İstoriçeskaya Grammatika Tyurskih Yazıkov, Morfologiya
(redaktor: E.R. Tenişev) Moskva “Nauka”.
Werner, Abraham (1998), The morphological and semantik classification of ‘evidentials’ and
modal verbs in West Germanic: the perfect(ive) catalyst, FAZ 12 12 1998, S: 192-
206.
Wiemer Björn (2006) ‘Grammatical Evidentiality in Lithuanian’ (A Typological Assessment),
BALTISTICA XLI (1) p. 33-49.
Willet, Thomas L. (1988) ‘A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentialiy.’
Studies in Language, 12, 51-97. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidentiality
Zaefferer, Dietmar (2005), ‘A general typology of modal categories, Tisskrift for
sprogforskning Argang 3., Nr.: 2, pp. 19-49, Detschland.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com