Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

KONUŞMA VE DİNLEME BECERİLERİ ÜZERİNE ÖĞRETMEN BİLİŞİ VE İNANIŞLARI

TEACHERS’ COGNITION AND BELIEVES ON SPEAKING AND LISTENING SKILLS

Journal Name:

  • Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2015

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Teacher cognition is an umbrella term (Borg, 2006) which has a long tradition of research study (Beishuizen, Hof, van Putten, Bouwmeester & Asscher, 2001). According to Kumaravadivelu, teaching methods’ period came to an end and teachers must be autonomous and self-directed persons who can construct their own theory of practice (2006a, 2006b). That unveils the role of teacher in language teaching. Both the efforts made for the acquisition of ‘speaking skill’ which is the cornerstone of communication (Bygate, 1987) and the ‘listening skill’ which is considered as an active process of communication (Vandergrift, 2004; Richards, 2005) cause the subject to be discussed and studied. Therefore, teachers and what they think and believe about the acquisition of these two skills become substantial. This study is carried out with English Teachers working in various high schools in Diyarbakır, to find out teachers’ cognition on listening and speaking skills.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Öğretmen bilişi araştırmaları uzun bir geleneğe sahiptir (Beishuizen, Hof, van Putten, Bouwmeester & Asscher, 2001) ve ‘Öğretmen Bilişi’ terimi şemsiye bir terimdir (Borg, 2006). Kumaravadivelu’ya göre öğretim yöntemleri dönemi sona ermiştir ve öğretmenler özerk ve kendini yönlendirebilen, kendi uygulamalarından teoriler oluşturan kişiler olmalıdır (2006a, 2006b). Bu durum öğretmenin dil öğretimindeki rolünü gözler önüne sermektedir. Hem iletişimin temel taşı olan ‘konuşma becerisi’nin (Bygate, 1987) hem de iletişimin aktif süreci olarak kabul edilen ‘dinleme becerisi’nin (Vandergrift, 2004; Richards, 2005) edinimi çabaları, konunun tartışılması ve araştırılmasına neden olmaktadır. Bu nedenle öğretmenler ve bu iki beceri hakkında ne düşündükleri önemli hale gelmektedir. Bu çalışma Diyarbakır’da çeşitli liselerde çalışan öğretmenlerle dinleme ve konuşma becerileri hakkındaki bilişlerini ortaya çıkarmak için gerçekleştirilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-konusma-dinleme-becerileri-uzerine-ogretmen-bilisi-inanislari.pdf
  • 2
173
178
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Beishuizen, J. J., Hof, E., van Putten, C. M. , Bouwmeester, S. & Asscher, J. (2001). Students’ and teachers’
cognition about good teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychological Society, 71, 185–201.
Borg, S. (1999). Studying teacher cognition in second language grammar teaching. System, 27, 19–31.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think,
know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36,81–109.
Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education. London: Continuum.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, H. D. (2002). English Language Teaching in the “Post-Method” Era: Toward Better Diagnosis, Treatment,
and Assessment. Bulunduğu eser: Richards, Jack C. & Renandya, Willy A. (ed.) Methodology in Language
Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. (ss. 9–19). Cambridge: Cambridge Universtiy Press.
Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flowerdew, J. ve Miller L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Feryok, A. (2010). Language teacher cognition: Complex dynamic systems? System: 38, 272–279
Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi
Journal of Research in Education and Teaching
Mayıs 2015 Cilt:4 Sayı:2 Makale No: 17 ISSN: 2146-9199
178
Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks Principle.
Review of Educational Research: 60 (3), 419–469.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly: 35 (4), 537–560
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. New Heaven, CT: Yale
University Press.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006a). Understanding language teaching. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006b). Methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends. TESOL Quarterly: 40 (1), 59–81.
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. New Jersey: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
McCarthy, M. (1998). Spoken language and applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pennycook, A. (1989). The Concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching.
TESOL Quarterly: 23 (4), 589–618.
Richards, J. C., ve Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Aproahces and methods in language teaching (2. Baskı). New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2005). Second thoughts on teaching listening. SAGE Publications, 36 (1), 85–92.
Turner, J. C., Christensen, A. & Meyer, D. K. (2009). Teachers’ beliefs about student learning and
motivation.Bulunduğu eser: Saha L. J., & Dworkin, A. G. (ed.) International handbook of research on teachers
and teaching, (ss. 361–371). Springer Verlag.
Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen?. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics: 24, 3-25.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com