Buradasınız

ÖĞRETMENLİK UYGULAMASI YAKLAŞIMLARI

Teacher Practicum Approaches

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this article, it is examined that in the process of improving teaching competence of teacher candidates, quality of instruction depends on large extent on the impact of supervisors and staff can use the teacher practicum approaches. These are clinical, developmental and artistic teacher practicum approaches. Each teacher practicum approaches are explained in details. As a result, it is suggested to teacher preparetion institutions in this approaches, their institutions with respect to circumtances may be adapted or used with together.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makalede, öğretmen adaylarının öğretme becerilerindeki yeterliklerini artırma sürecinde, eğitimin niteliğine büyük ölçüde etkisi olan uygulama öğretim elemanı ve ilgili personelin öğretmenlik uygulamasını yürütme sırasında kullanabilecekleri öğretmenlik uygulaması yaklaşımları incelenmiştir. Bunlar, klinik, gelişimsel ve sanatsal öğretmenlik uygulaması yaklaşımlarıdır. Her bir öğretmenlik uygulaması yaklaşımının basamakları ayrıntılarıyla açıklanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, öğretmen yetiştiren kurumlara yönelik olarak bu yaklaşımları, kendi kurumlarının koşulları doğrultusunda uyarlayabilecekleri gibi birlikte kullanabilecekleri de önerilmiştir.
281-292

REFERENCES

References: 

Beach, D. M., and Reinhartz, J. (1989). Supervision: Focus on İnstruction. New York:
Harper and Row.
Boyan, N. J., ve Copeland, W.D. (1978). Instructional Supervision Training Program.
Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.
Cohan, M. M., and Gellman, V. C. (1988). Supervision: A Developmental Approach for
Fostering İnquiry in Preservice Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education,
38, 2-8.
Cohn, M. (1981). A New Supervision Model for Linking Theory to Practice. Journal of
Teacher Education, 32, 26-31.
Conderman, G., Morin, J., and Stephens T. J. (2005). Special Education Student Teaching
Practices. Preveting School Failure, 49(3), 5-10.
Dale, D. A. (1987). Student Teacher Supervision and Performance Evaluation: Manual
for The University Supervisior. Department of Child Development, Iowa
State University. Ames, Iowa.
Daresh, J. C. (1989). Supervision as a proactive process. New York: Longman.
Eisner, E. W. (1982). An artistic approach to supervision. In T. Sergovanni (Ed.), Supervision
Teaching (p. 53-56) Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Gall, M. D. , Acheson K. A. (2010). Clinical Supervision and Teacher Development.(sixth
edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Gleason, M. M., and Hall, T. E. (1991). Focusing on İnstructional Design to İmplement a
Performance-based Teacher Training Program: The University of Oregon
Model. Education & Treatment of Children, 14(4), 316, 17p, 2charts, 2diagrams.
Glickman, C. (1985). Supervision of Intruction: A Develepmental Approach. Boston:
Allyn&Bacon.
Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., and Gordon, J. M. (2009). Supervision and Instructional
Leadership: A Developmental Approach (8th Edition) Prentice Hall.
Goldhammer, R. (1969). Clinical Supervision. New York: Holt, Reinart and Winston.
O’reilly, M. F. (1992). An analysis of Supervision Procedures to Teach Systematic Instruction
Competencies to Special Education Student Teachers. Unpublished
Doctoral Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, USA.
Özyürek, M. (2008). Nitelikli Öğretmen Yetiştirmede Sorunlar ve Çözümler: Özel Eğitim
Örneği. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 189-226.
Warger, C. L., and Aldinger, L. E. (1984). Improving Teacher Supervision: The Perservice
Consultation Model. Teacher Education and Special Education, 7(3),
155-163.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com