Örgütlerde Yapısal-Stratejik Konfigürasyonlar: Koşulbağımlılık Kuramı, Konfigürasyon Yaklaşımı Bağlamında Örgüt Yapıları Üzerine Önermeler

Adler, Paul ve Bryan Borys (1996), “Two Types Of Bureaucracy: Enabling And Coercive”,
Administrative Science Quarterly, 61-89.
Child, John (1984), Organization. New York: Harper & Row.
Daft, Richard. ve Becker, Selwyn.W. (1978), The Innovative Organization. New York: Elsevier.
Donaldson, Lex (1996), The Normal Science of Structural Contingency Theory. S. Clegg, C. Hardy
ve W Nord Handbook of Organization Studies, London: Sage, 57-76.
Donaldson, Lex (2001), The Contingency Theory of Organizations, Thousand Oaks:Sage.
Doty, D Harold, Glick, William H ve Huber, George P. (1993), “Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational
Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories”, Academy of Management Journal, 36(6),
1196-1250.
Drago, A. William (1998), “Structure as a Predictor of Strategic Planning Use”, Journal of Applied
Business Research, 14(1), 125-137.
Drazin, Robert ve Van de Hen, Andrew (1985), “Alternative Foms of Fit in Contingency Theory”.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 514-539.
Ferguson, D. Tamela. ve Ketchen David.J. (1999), “Organizational Configurations and Performance:
The Role of Statistical Power in Extant Research”, Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 385-402.
Forte, M., Hoffman, J.J., Lamont, B. ve Brockmann, E.N. (2000), “Organizational Form and
Environment: An Analysis of Between-Form and Within-Form Responses to Environmental
Change”, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 753-773.
Frederickson, W. James (1986), “The Strategic Decision Process and Organizational Structure”,
Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 280-297
Govindarajan, Vijay (1988), “A Contingency Approach to Strategy Implementation at the Business-
Unit Level: Integrating Administrative Mechanisms With Strategy”, Academy of Management
Journal, 31(4), 828-853.
Hage, Jerald. ve Aiken, Michael (1970), Social Change in Complex Organizations. New York:
Random House.
Hambrick, Donald (1983), “Some Tests of the Effectiveness and Functional Attributes of Miles And
Snow’s Strategic Types”, Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 5-26.
Hamilton, Gary G. ve Biggart, N. Woolsey (1988), Market, Culture and Authority: A Comparative
Analysis of Management and Organization in the Far East. American Journal of Sociology, 94 Ek:
52-94.
Ketchen, D.J., Combs, J.G., Russell, C.J., Shook, C., Dean, M.A., Runge, J., Lohrke, F.T., Naumann, S.E.,
Haptonstahl, D.E., Baker, R., Beckstein, B.A., Handler, C., Honig, H., Lamoureux, S. (1997),
"Organizational configurations and performance: a meta-analysis", Academy of Management
Journal, Vol. 40 No.1, 223-40.
Lee, Jonh ve Miller, Danny (1996), “Strategy, Environment and Performance in Two Technological
Contexts: Contingency in Korea”, Organization Studies, 17(5), 729-750.
Maurice, Marc (1976), “Introduction: Theoretical and Ideological Aspects of the Universalistic
Approach To The Study ff Organization”, International Studies of Management & Organization, 6
(3): 3-10.
Miller, Danny (1988), “Relating Porter's Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis
and Performance Implications”, Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 280-308.
Miller, Danny (1981), “Toward a New Contingency Approach: The Search for Organization
Gestalts”, Journal of Management Studies, 18(1), 1-26.
Miller, Danny (1986), “Configurations of Strategy and Structure: Towards a Synthesis”, Strategic
Management Journal, 7, 233-249.
Miller, Danny (1987), “Strategy Making and Structure: Analysis and Implications for Performance”,
Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 7-32.
Miller, Danny (1987), “The Genesis of Configuration”, Academy of Management Review, 12(4),
686-701.
Miller, Danny (1992), “Environmental Fit Versus Internal Fit”, Organization Science, 3(2), 159-178.
Miller, Danny (1996). “Configurations revisited. Strategic Management Journal, 17(7), 505-512.
Miller, Danny ve Whitney, John O. (1999), “Beyond Strategy: Configuration as a Pillar of
Competitive Advantage”, Business Horizons, 42 (3), 5-19.
Mintzberg, Henry (1979), The Structure of Organizations, Englewood Cliffs (NJ), Prenctice-Hall.
Mintzberg, Henry ve Lampel, Joseph. (1999), “Reflecting on The Strategy Process”, Sloan
Management Review, 40(3), 21-30.
Mintzberg, Henry., Lampel, J. ve Quinn, J., Ghoshal, Sumantra (2003), The Strategy Process:
Concepts, Contexts, Cases, Prentice Hall, U.K.
Orru, Marco., Biggart, N.W. ve Hamilton,G.G. (1991), Organizational Isomorphism in East Asia.
The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, CH: The University of Chicago Press
361-389.
Pfeffer, J. (1997), The New Directions for Organization Theory: Problems and Prospects, New
EKİM 2008 169
York: Oxford University Press.
Russell, Robert D. ve Russell, Craig J. (1992), “An Examination of the Effects of Organizational
Norms, Organizational Structure, and Environmental Uncertainty on Entrepreneurial Strategy”,
Journal of Management, 18(4), 639-656.
Schoonhoven, Claudia. B. (1981), “Problems With Contingency Theory: Testing Assumptions
Hidden Within The Language Of Contingency Theory”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26,
349-377.
Slevin, P. Dennis ve Covin G. Jeffrey (1997), “Strategy Formation Patterns, Performance, and the
Significance of Context”, Journal of Management, 23(2), 189-200.
Venkatmaran, N. ve Camillus, John C. (1984), “Exploring the Concept of “Fit” in Strategic
Management”, Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 513-525.
Venkatraman, N. (1989), “The Concept of Fit in Strtaegy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical
Correspondence”, Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423-444.
Whitley, Richard (1992), Societies, firms and markets: The social structuring of business systems.
European Business Systems, Sage Publications, 5-45.
Whitley, Richard (1994), “Dominant Forms of Economic Organizations in Market Economies”,
Organization Studies, 15(2), 153-182
Whitley, Richard (1999), Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business
Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.