Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Anlamın Bağlam Açısından İncelenmesi: Kökanlambilim ve Artanlambilim

Analysis of Meaning in terms of Context: Semantics and Pragmatics

Journal Name:

  • Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2004

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The concept of meaning is studied basically under the fields of semantics and pragmatics, and context is generally dealt with in the latter. Some conceptual problems may arise while translating them into Turkish.The former is translated as ‘anlambilim – meaning science’, and the latter as ‘edimbilim – act science / kullanımbilim – use science’. This paper deals with both semantics and pragmatics in terms of context and use and exemplifies them. New categorisations for both context and use are suggested and the operators that enables the transition from semantic meaning to pragmatic meaning are emphasized.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Anlam konusu temel olarak semantics ve pragmatics başlıklarıaltında incelenir ve bağlam genellikle ikinci alanda ele alınır. Türkçe’ye çevrilirken bazıkavramsal sorunlar ortaya çıkabilir. Birincisi anlambilim, ikincisi ise edimbilim / kullanımbilim şeklinde çevrilir. Bu çalışmada, her iki alan da bağlam ve kullanım açılarından ele alınmakta ve örneklerle desteklenmektedir. Yeni bağlam ve anlam türleri önerilmekte ve kökanlamdan artanlama geçişi sağlayan işleticiler üzerinde durulmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-anlamin-baglam-acisindan-incelenmesi-kokanlambilim-artanlambilim.pdf
  • 3
245-255
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Aksan, D. (1999). Anlambilim. Ankara: Engin Yayınevi
Carnap, R. (1942). Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: the MIT
Press.
Çakır, C. (1997). Factors That Lead Intermediate and Advanced English Learners in
Turkey into Semantic Interlanguage. Doctoral Thesis. Gazi University,
Ankara.
Çakır, C. (2004). Bağlam. Felsefe Ansiklopedisi 2. Etik Yayınları.
Finegan, E. & Besnier, N. (1989). Language: Its Structure and Use. San Diego:
Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers.
Hofmann, T. R. (1993). Realms of Meaning. London: Longman.
Jackson, H. (1988). Words and Their Meaning. New York: Longman.
Kecskes, I. Editorial: Lexical Merging, Conceptual Blending, and Cultural Crossing,
Intercultural Pragmatics, 2004, Volume 1-1, 1–26.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1986). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. OUP.
Lewis, M. (1993). The Lexical Approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
Leech, G. (1988). The Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 24, Sayı3 (2004) 245-255 255
Morris, C.W. (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Chicago: Chicago University
Press.
Morris, C.W. (1942). Signs, Language, and Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:
Prentice Hall.
Nöth, W. (1990). Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indianapolis University Press.
Owens, R. E. (1988). Language Development:An Introduction. Columbus: Merrill
Publishing Company.
Palmer, F. R. (1981). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ullmann, S. (1962). Semantics: An Introduction to the Study of Meaning. Oxford:Basil
Blackwell.
van Dijk, T. A. (1981). Studies in the Pragmatics of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton
Publishers.
Yule, G. (2000). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com