Buradasınız

Farklı Liselerde Okuyan 11. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Bilimin Doğası Hakkındaki Bakış Açılarının Karşılaştırılması

Comparison of Students in Different High School Regarding Their Views on Nature of Science

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
One of the most important aims for science education is to promote scientific literacy which is “magic concept” in curriculum efforts and reform all over the world. For that reason, the purpose of this study was to compare beliefs of 11th grade students from different high schools on the nature of science. The Perspectives of Scientific Epistemology questionnaire was utilized to assess students’ understanding of nature of science. Although all schools are significant differences to pass university entrance examination, the results revealed that among the three school types did not show any significant differences i n students’ views on nature of science. The results show that students hold positivist views on the producing of scientific knowledge, creative and imaginations, scientific opinions, and the effects of socio-cultural on scientist.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bilim ve teknolojide aktif ve bilinçli karar verebilen, günlük yaşantıları ile ilgili problemlere yaklaşımlarında bilimsel düşünebilen bireyleri tanımlayan “bilimsel okur-yazar” kavramı fen eğitim uzmanları ve program geliştiriciler tarafından, sihirli bir kavram olarak birçok ülkenin öğretim programının merkezinde yer almaktadır. Bu çalışmada bilimsel okur-yazar bireylerin yetiştirilmesi hedeflerinden birisi olan; fen lisesi, anadolu lisesi ve genel lise öğrencilerinin, bilimin doğası hakkındaki bakış açıları karşılaştırılmıştır. Çalışmaya 11. sınıfta okuyan 117 öğrenci katılmıştır. Üç okulun üniversite giriş sınavı başarılarında önemli farklılıklar bulunmasına rağmen, bilimin doğası hakkındaki bakış açıları arasında önemli bir farklılık olmadığı görülmüştür. Sonuçlar; üç okulun öğrencilerinde de; bilimsel bilginin deneyselliği, veri ve kanıt, teori ve kanun, bilimsel düşünce ve bilimsel bilgi konularında yetersiz bakış açısına sahip oldukları ve bu konularda bazı kavram yanılgılarının bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir.
533-560

REFERENCES

References: 

AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). (1993). Benchmarks
for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002, April). The development of conceptions of the nature of
scientific knowledge and knowing in the middle and high school years: A cross-sectional study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National
Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
Aikenhead, G. S. & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: “Views
on science-technology -society” (VOSTS). Science Education, 76, 477–491.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). An exploratory study of the knowledge
base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 673–
699.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective
explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature
of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 37, no.4, 295-317.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 30, Sayı 2 (2010) 533-560 556
Bell, R., Lederman, N.G. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon
one’s conception of nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 37, 563–581.
Dogan Bora, N. (2005), Türkiye Genelinde Ortaöğretim Fen Branşı Öğretmen ve
Öğrencilerinin Bilimin Doğası Üzerine Görüşlerinin Araştırılması, Yayınlanmamış
Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Dogan, N, Abd-El-Khalick, F.(2007). Turkish Grade 10 Students’ and Science
Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science: A National Study. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, vol. 37, no.4, 295-317.
Erdoğan, R. (2004), Investigation Of The Preservice Science Teachers’ Views On
Nature Of Science, Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical
University, Ankara.
Haidar, A. H. & Balfakih, N. M. (1999) United Arab Emirates science students’ views
about the epistemology of science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
national association for research in science teaching, Boston, MA.
Irez, S. (2008). Nature of science as depicted in Turkish biology textbooks. Science
Education, 93,( 3), 422-447.Kahyaoğlu, E. (2004). Turkish Preservice Science
Teachers’ Views on STS: Characteristics of Scientists’ Work. Unpublished
master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
Klopfer, L., W. Cooley. (1961).Test on understanding science, Form W. Princeton, NJ:
Educational Testing Service.
Khishfe, R. (2008). The development of seventh graders’ views of nature of science.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45,(4), 470–496.
Lederman, N. G. (1986). Relating teaching behavior and classroom climate to changes
in students’ conceptions of the nature of science. Science Education , 70(1), 3 -19.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 30, Sayı 2 (2010) 533-560 557
Lederman, N. G., Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of
science: Do they really influence teaching behavior? Science Education, 71(5),
721-734.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A
review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol.29, no.4,
331-359.
Lederman, N., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L. & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of
Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of
learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.
Lucas, K. B., & Roth, W.M. (1996). The nature of scientific knowledge and student
learning: Two longitudinal case studies. Research in Science Education, 74, 225–
239.
Mc Comas, W., F. (1998). The Principal Elements of The Nature of Science: Dispelling
the Myths. The Nature of Science in Science Education. Kluwer Academic
Publishers. Printed in Netherlands.
Mackay, L.D. (1971). Development of understanding about the nature of science.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8(1), 57–66.
MEB (2004). İlköğretim Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi, 4-8 Sınıflar Öğretim Programı.
Ankara: TTKB.
MEB (2007) Ortaöğretim Fizik, Kimya, Biyoloji,Astronomi, Jeoloji Dersi Öğretim
Programı.Ankara:
http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/ogretmen/modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=viewdo
wnload&cid=75
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards.Washington,
DC: National Academic Press.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 30, Sayı 2 (2010) 533-560 558
Ryan, A. G. (1987). High school graduates’ beliefs about science-technology - society.
IV. The characteristics of scientists. Science Education, 71, 489–510.
Rubba, P. A., Andersen, H. O. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess
secondary school students’ understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge.
Science Education 62(4), 449-458.
Shapin, S.. (1996). The Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shapira, B. L. (1989). What children bring to light: Giving high status to learners’ views
and actions in science. Science Education, 73, 711–733.
Smith, M. U., L.C. Scharman. (1999). Defining Versus Describing the Nature of
Science: A Pragmatic Analysis for Classroom Teachers and Science Educators.
Science Education, 83, 493–509.
Solomon, J., Scott, L. & Duveen, J. (1996). Large-scale exploration of pupils’
understanding of the nature of science. Science Education, 80, 493–508.
Suppe, F. (1977). The Structure of Scientific Theories (2nd ed.) Chicago: University of
Illinois Press.
Yager, R. E. (2000). The History and Future of Science Education Reform, The
Clearing House, September, 10ct vol.74, No.1, 51-54 Defining the discipline of
science. Science Education 68(1), 35–37.
Yakmacı, B. (1998). Science (biology, chemistry and physics) teachers’ views on the
nature of science as a dimension of scientific literacy. Unpublished master’s
thesis, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul.
Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in
views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas.
Science Education, 86, 343–367

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com