Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Harran Ovası Koşullarında Buharlaşma Kabından Faydalanılarak Damla Sulama Sistemiyle Sulanan Domates Bitkisinde Sulama Programının Belirlenmesi

Determination of Irrigation Scheduling of Drip Irrigated Tomato Using Pan-Evaporation in Harran Plain

Journal Name:

  • Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2004

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study was conducted to determine the amount of irrigation water and two irrigation intervals on the yield and growth of tomato irrigated by drip method. The amount of irrigation water applied was based on cumulative evaporation from a screened class-A pan. The irrigation treatments consisted of two different irrigation intervals (I] = 4 and I2 = 8 days), and three pan coefficients (kcpı= 1.00, kcp2 = 0.80, kcp3 = 0.60). The seasonal irrigation water varied from 465 to 920 mm; the seasonal ET ranged from 495 to 1150 mm; and yield of tomato varied from 53.1 to 112.5 ton ha"1 based on treatments used. According to the results, it was concluded that tomato could be irrigated at 4-day irrigation intervals and the irrigation water amount might be computed by 0.80 of class-A-pan cumulative evaporation. A significant reduction in growth parameters (plant height, canopy diameter and stem diameter), dry biomass and leaf relative water content (LRWC) was observed based on reductions in water use and irrigation water applications.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma, damla sulama sistemiyle sulanan domates bitkisinde iki farklı sulama aralığı ve sulama suyu miktarının verim ve gelişim faktörlerine etkisini belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Sulama suyu miktarının belirlenmesinde buharlaşma kabı kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada iki sulama aralığı (I|=4 ve h= 8 gün) ve açık su yüzeyi buharlaşmasına dayandırılan üç su düzeyi (kep, = 1.00, kcp2 = 0.80 ve kcp3 = 0.60) uygulanmıştır. Konulara ilşkin ortalama mevsimlik sulama suyu, bitki su tüketimi ve verim sırasıyla 465-920 mm, 495-1150 mm ve 53.1-112.5 ton ha"1 değerleri arasmda değişmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları, Harran ovası koşullarında domates bitkisinin 4 gün aralıklarla ve buharlaşma kabı katasyısrnın 0.80'i alınarak sulanabilineceğini göstermiştir. Konulara verilen sulama suyu ve bitki su tüketimine bağlı olarak bitki büyüme parametrelerinde (bitki boyu, taç genişliği ve gövde çapı), kuru madde miktarı ve nisbi yaprak su içeriğinde önemli değişimler gözlenmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_159097_21_pp_43-50.pdf
  • 1
43-50
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Anonymous, A. 1995. Statistic program for forestry and
agriculture. Version 4.01. University of Ege,
Faculty of Agriculture, İzmir.
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M . 1988.
Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for
computing crop water requirements. FAO
irrigation and drainage paper No 56, p301, FAORome.
Aliyu, S.B. 1987. Studies on the feasibility of alternate
furrow irrigation on tomato (Roma VF). BSc.
Eng. degree Thesis, Agricultural Engineering.
Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, unpublished,
pp.85-105.
Alvino, A., Centritto, M . , Tedeschi, P. and Busiello, F.
1989. Growth analysis o f Capsicum Annuum L.
under different irrigation regimes. International
symposium on scheduling of irrigation for
vegetable crops under field conditions, Acta
Horticulturae 278, pp. 359-368.
Balçın, M.
an
d Güleç, H. 1999. Determination irrigation scheduling of tomato using class-A-pan in Tokat region. General directory of rural affairs, no 108, p. 238-252.
Bogle, C.R., Hartz, T.K. and Nunez, C. 1989. Comparison of subsurface trickle and furrow irrigation on plastic mulched and bare soil for tomato production. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science, 114(1), 40-43.
Çevik,
B.
, Abak, K„ San, N., Kırda. C. and Topaloğlu. F 1996. Effects of different irrigation levels on yield and quality of some vegetables irrigated with drip irrigation in Harran plain.GAP no. 105, p.62.
Dawood, S.A. and Hamad, S.N. 1985. A comparison of on-farm irrigation systems performance. In: Drip/trickle irrigation in action published h\ ASAE, proceedings of the third international drip/trickle irrigation congress, 18-21 November 1985, Fresno, CA.
Doorenbos, J. and Kassam A.H. 1988. Yield response to
water. Irrigation and drainage paper no:33, 193
p., FAO, Rome. Doorenbos, J. and Pruitt, W.A. 1992. Crop water
requirements. Irrigation and drainage paper 24,
p. 114 FAO, Rome. Ertek, A. and Kanber, R. 2000. Determination of irrigation
interval and level in cotton using class-A-pan
evaporation. Tr. J. Agriculture and Forestry.
24:293-300.
Grimes, D.W., Schweers, V.H. and Wiley, PX. 1976. Drip and furrow irrigation of fresh market tomatoes on a slowly permeable soil. Cal. Agric. 30, 8-13.
Hardeman, T.L., Taber, H.G. and Cox, D.F. 1999. Trickle irrigation of vegetables: water conservation without yield reduction. Journal of Vegetable Crop Production 5(2), p. 23-33.
Hedge, D.M. 1987. The effect of soil water potential method of irrigation, canopy "temperature, yield and water use of radish. Hort. Sci. 62(4),507-511.
James, L. 1993. Principles of farm irrigation system design. Krieger publishing company Malabar, Florida.
Kadam, J.R. 1993. Effects of irrigation methods on root shoot biomass and yield of tomato. J. Maharashtra Agric. 18, 493-494.
Kanber, R. 1984. Irrigation of first and second grown crop peanut in Çukurova conditions using class-A-pan evaporation, General directory of rural affairs, no: 114(64).
Mitchell, J.P.C., Shennman, S.R. and May, D.M. 1991.
Tomato fruit yield and quality under water deficit and salinity. J.Am.Soc.HortJSci. 116(2), 215-221.
Nagel, D. 1995. Commercial production of bell peppers in Mississippi. Miss. State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv. Information sheet, No: 1516, Starkville.
Pruitt, W.O., Fereres, E., Martin, P.E., Singh, H., Henderson, D.W., Hagan, R.M., Tarantino, E. and Chandio, B. 1989. Microclimate, evapotranspiration, and water-use efficiency for drip and furrow irrigated tomatoes. Int. Com. on irrigation and drainage (ICID), 12 th congress, no: 22, p. 367-393.
Ramalan, A.A. and Nwokeocha, C.U. 2000. Effects of furrow irrigation methods, mulching and soil water suction on the growth, yield and water use efficiency of tomato in the Nigerian Savanna. .Agricultural Water Management, 45, 317-330.
Sirinivas, K., Hedge, D.M. and Havanagi, G.V. 1989.
Plant water relations, canopy temperature, yield and water-use efficiency of water melon Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) J. Hort. Sci. 64 (1) 115-124.
Tan, C.S. 1995. Effect of drip and sprinkle irrigation on yield and quality of five tomato cultivars in southwestern Ontario. Can. J. Plant Sci. 75, p. 225-230.
Yamasaki, S. and Dillenburg, L.R. 1999. Measurements of leaf relative water content in araucaria angustifolia. Revista Brasilleira de Fisiologia Vegetal, 11(2): 69-75.
Yazar, A., Oğuzer. V., Tülücü, K., Anoğlu, H..
Gençoğlan,
C
. and Diker, K. 1991. Determination of irrigation schedling of soybean in Harran plain using class-A-pan. GAP no : 45.
Yohannes, F. and Tadesse, T. 1998. Effect of drip and furrow irrigation and plant spacing on yield of tomato at Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. Agricultural Water Management, 35, 201-207.
50

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com