Buradasınız

GİRİŞİMCİLİK VE BİLİŞSEL YANLILIK

ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND COGNITIVE BIASES

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
As Manimala (1992) states that most academic researches about entrepreneurship have been focused on the early experiences of the entrepreneur, conducive environment, entrepreneurial background, motivations and traits. That's why implemented politics for the purpose of improving entrepreneurial conditions and success have been in accordance with the improvement of these factors. Besides all these factors understanding the entrepreneurial behaviour affecting firms, with in this context identifying the role of the entrepreneur and entrepreneurial process becomes important for the success of new ventures and understanding the role of the entrepreneurial process, entrepreneurship training and development. Clarifying the reasons affecting ventures, it is important to understand cognitive process and factors. Entrepreneurial cognitive biases provide useful clues to find out the reasons of success and failurel of the entrepreneurs. This article examined the entrepreneurial cognitive biases that has been widely seen in general and narrowly the impact of cognitive biases on the entrepreneurs.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Manimala'nın (1992) da ifade ettiği gibi, günümüze değin girişimcilik konusunda yapılan akademik çalışmaların çoğunluğu yeni bir girişimin başarısında girişimcinin önceki deneyim ve tecrübeleri, girişimcilik alt yapısı, teşvik edici çevre, girişimcinin motivasyonu ve girişimcilik özellikleri üzerinde yoğunlaşmaktadır. Bu nedenle de girişimcilik koşullarının geliştirilmesinde ve girişimsel başarıların artırılmasında izlenen ve uygulanan politikalar da bu faktörlerin iyileştirilmesine yönelik olmuştur. Bu faktörler önemli olmakla birlikte tüm bu faktörlerin yanı sıra işletmeyi etkileyen girişimsel davranışları anlamak, bu anlamda girişimcileri ve girişimsel süreçteki rollerini belirlemek; yeni girişimlerin ve girişimcilerin eğitimi, gelişimi, başarısı açısından ve girişimsel hatalardan kaçınmada önemli olmaktadır. İşletmeyi etkileyen kararlar ve eylemler dizisini belirleyebilmek için bilişsel süreci ve bilişsel faktörleri anlamak gerekmektedir. Bilişsel yanlılıklar girişimcilerin başarı ya da başarısızlıklarının temel nedenlerine inmede kullanışlı ipuçları vermektedir. Bu çalışmada girişimcilerin yaygın olarak kullandıkları ya da maruz kaldıkları bilişsel yanlılıklar üzerinde durulmaktadır.
74-95

REFERENCES

References: 

ADOMDZA, Gordon. 2004. Why Do Inventors Continue When Experts Say Stop? The Effects of Overconfidence, Optimism and Illusion of Control. A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Applied Science in Management Sciences. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: 1-123.
ARKES, Hal R. ve Catherina BLUMER. (1985) The Psychology of Sunk Cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35:124-140
BANDURA, Albert,1994. "Self-Efficacy", V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998) içinde:71-81.
Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi (6:1) 2011
Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development
Girişimcilik ve Bilişsel Yanlılık
.93.
BARON, Robert A. 1998. Cognitive Mechanisms in Entrepreneurship: Why and When Entrepreneurs Think Differently than Others People. Journal of Business Venturing 19: 221-239.
BARON, Robert A. 1999. Counterfactual Thinking and Venture Formation: The Potential Effects of Thinking About "What Initial Might Have Been". Journal of Business Venturing 15: 75-91.
BARON, Robert A. 2004. The Cognitive
Perspective: A Valuable Tool for Answering Entrepreneurship's Basic "Why" Questions. Journal of Business Venturing 13: 275-294.
BARON, Robert A. ve Thomas B. WARD. 2004. Expanding Entrepreneurial Cognition's Toolbox: Potential Contributions from the Field of Cognitive Science, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice: 553-573.
BERGLUND, Henrik. 2005. Toward a Theory of
Entrepreneurial Action- Exploring Risk, Opportunity and Self in Technology Entrepreneurship. Department of Technology Management and Economics- Chalmers University of Technology Working Paper:1-63.
BRYANT, Peter. 2006. Self-Regulation and Heuristics in Entrepreneurial Opportunity Selection and Exploitation. Presented at the 2006 Academy of Management Meeting Atlanta,USA:1-38.
BUSENITZ, Lowell W. Ve Jay B. BARNEY.1997. Differences Between Entrepreneurs and Managers in Large Organizations: Biases and Heuristics in Strategic Decision Making. Journal of Business Venturing 12: 9-30.
Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi (6:1) 2011
Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development
94
Serpil TOMAK
DÖM, Serpil.2003. Yatırımcı Psikolojisi. Değişim Yayınları: İstanbul.
ENDRES, Anthony M. ve Christine R. WOODS. 2003. Modern Theories of Entrepreneurial Behavior: An Appraisal. Universtity of Auckland Working Paper: 1-39.
EDWARDS, Ward. ve Detlof von WINTERFELDT.1986. On Cognitive Illusions and Their Implications. (Derl.) İçinde, Arkes,H.,R.,ve Hammond,K.,R., Judgment and Decision Making: 643¬679.
KAHNEMAN, Daniel ve Amos TVERSKY.1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk: Econometrica, 47: 263-291.
LE ROUX, Ingrid. 2005. Entrepreneurial Cognition and the Decision to Exploit a New Venture Creation Opportunity. University of Pretoria-Faculty of Economic and Management Science Doctoral Thesis.
MANIMALA, Mathew J. 1992. Entrepreneurial Heuristics: A Comparison Between High PI (Pioneering-Innovative) and Low PI Ventures. Journal of Business Venturing 7: 477-504.
MARSHALL, Gordon. 1999. Psikoloji
Sözlüğü(Çeviren: Osman Akınhay ve Derya Kömürcü), Bilim ve Sanat Yayınevi: Ankara.
McMAHON, Richard G.P. 2006. Behavioural Finance, Entrepreneurial Cognition and SME Financial Management. School of Commerce Research Paper Series 06-3, ISSN:1441-3906: 1-33.
Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi (6:1) 2011
Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development
Girişimcilik ve Bilişsel Yanlılık
.95
MITCHELL, Ronald K., Lowell BUSENITZ,
Theresa LANT, Patricia P. McDOUGALL, Eric A. MORSE ve J. Brock SMITH. 2002. Toward a Theory of Entrepreneurial Cognition: Rethinking the Side of Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice:
93-104.
ÖZEN, Aysun. 2004. "Yürekten bağlılık: Nereye kadar?", Pivolka Uygulamalı Psikoloji Dergisi, Sayı.14: 15¬17.
SİMON, Mark, Susan M. HOUGHTON ve Karl AQUINO. 1999. Cognitive Biases, Risk Perception, and Venture Formation: How Individuals Decide to Start Companies. Journal of Business Venturing 15: 113-134.
TVERSKY, Amos ve Daniel KAHNEMAN. 1973. Availability:A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability, Judgement Under Uncertainity: Heuristics and Biases, (Derl.) İçinde, Kahneman,D., Tversky,A., ve Slovic,P.,1982, Judgement Under Uncertainity: Heuristics and Biases:163-178.
TVERSKY, Amos ve Daniel KAHNEMAN. 1974. Judgement Under Uncertainity: Heuristics and Biases, (Derl.) İçinde, Kahneman,D., Slovic,P., ve Tversky,A., 1982, Judgement Under Uncertainity: Heuristics and
Biases:3-68.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com