Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

DÜNDEN BUGÜNE AVRUPA GÜVENLİK VE İŞBİRLİĞİ TEŞKİLATI

A Historical Overview of the Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe; from Past to Present

Journal Name:

  • Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
The Conference for Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE), emerging as a dialog and cooperation process during the Cold War, helped to end it by facilitating the endorsement of some important international documents such as Helsinki Final Act, Paris Chart, and The Treaty on Conventional Forces in Europe Agreement (CFE). The OSCE, which was preoccupied with the democratization of Eastern Europe and the crisis management areas in the 1990’s has become politically marginalized due to the enlargements of NATO and EU. Having failed to make OSCE a core element of European security architecture, Russia has initiated a new and different European security structure which aimed at decreasing NATO and USA’s role in Europe. In this article, the historical role of OSCE, as well as its position in European security architecture will be analyzed in the context of Global Powers’ expectations.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Soğuk Savaş döneminin diyalog ve işbirliği süreci olarak ortaya çıkan Avrupa Güvenlik ve İşbirliği Konferansı (AGİK), Helsinki Nihai Belgesi, Paris Şartı ve Avrupa Konvansiyonel Kuvvetler Anlaşması (AKKA) gibi önemli uluslararası belgelerin imzalanmasını sağlayarak Soğuk Savaş’ın bitirilmesine yardımcı olmuştur. 1990’larda Doğu Avrupa’da demokrasinin yerleştirilmesi ve kriz yönetimi konularında ağırlıklı olarak faaliyet gösteren AGİT, ABD’nin NATO’yu, Batı Avrupa ülkelerinin de AB’yi genişletme çabaları sonucu, politik olarak marjinalleşme sürecine girmiştir. AGİT’i Avrupa Güvenlik mimarisinde esas unsur yapmak isteyen ancak, bunu başaramayan Rusya Federasyonu (RF), NATO’nun Avrupa’daki rolünü azaltacak, ABD’yi bölgeden dışlayacak farklı güvenlik seçeneklerine yönelmiştir. Bu makalede AGİT’in tarihsel rolü ile günümüzde Avrupa Güvenlik mimarisindeki yeri, küresel güçlerin beklentileri bağlamında incelenecektir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-dunden-bugune-avrupa-guvenlik-isbirligi-teskilati.pdf
  • 11
27-52
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Areshev Andrei; “ CFE: An Archaic Treaty and New Reality”,
International Affairs, 2007, s.12-27.
Arı, Tayyar; Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Dış Politika, Alfa yy.,
İstanbul, 2004.
Bailes, Alyson J. K.; “NATO’s European Pillar: The European
Security and Defense Identity”, Defense 3. Analysis Vol. 15, No. 3, s.
305–322, 1999.
Bailes, Alyson J.K.; “The Politico-Military Dimension of OSCE”,
Helsinki Monitor 2006 no. 3, s. 214-226.
Brichambaut, Marc Perrin de; “The OSCE and the 21st Century,
Helsinki Monitor: Security and Human Rights 2007 no. 3, s.180-192.
Canbolat, İbrahim S.; Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye: Uluslar Üstü Bir
Sistemle Ortaklık, Alfa, İstanbul, 2006.
Çakmak, Haydar; Avrupa Güvenliği, Akçağ Yayınları, Ankara,
2003,
Çayhan, B. Esra; “Avrupa Güvenliği ve Savunma Politikası ve
Türkiye”, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, İİBF Dergisi, Sayı: 3, 2002.
Çomak Hasret; “Türkiye, NATO, AGSK, AOGSP”,
http://stradigma.com/turkce/ subat2003/makale6.html,13 Eyl 09.
Çomak, Hasret; “Güvenliğin Yeni Boyutları, NATO ve Türkiye”,
TASAM, http://www.tasam.org/index.php?altid=1360,13 Eyl 09.
Dedeoğlu, Beril; Uluslararası Güvenlik ve Strateji, Yeniyüzyil
yayınları, İstanbul, Mayıs 2008.
Dunay, Pal, “ On the (Continuing Residual) Relevance of the CFE
Regime”, Helsinki Monitor 2004 No. 4, s. 263-279.
Falkenrath, Richard A.; “The CFE Flank Dispute, Waiting in the
Wings”, International Security, Vol. 19, No. 4 (Spring 1995), s.118-144.
Fendoğlu, H. Tahsin; “Güvenlik Boyutu Bağlamında Avrupa
Güvenlik ve İşbirliği Teşkilatı, http://www.egm.gov.tr/egitim/
dergi/eskisayi/36/web/anayasa_hukuku_insan_haklari/doc_dr_h_tahsin
_fendoolu.htm 26 Ağustos 09.
Freire, Maria Raquel; “The OSCE’s Post-September 11 Agenda
and Central Asia”, Global Society, Vol. 19, No. 2, April, 2005, s. 189-209.
Ghebali, Victor-Yves, “Growing Pains at the OSCE: The Rise and
Fall of Russia’s Pan-European Expectations”, Cambridge Review of
International Affairs, Volume 18, Number 3, October 2005, s. 375-388.
Ghebali, Victor-Yves; “The OSCE Long-Term Missions: A Creative Tool
Under Challenge, Helsinki Monitor 2004, No. 3, s. 202-219.
Habegger, Beat; “Democratic Control of the OSCE: The Role of
the Parliamentary Assembly”, Helsinki Monitor 2006 no. 2, s.133-143.
Herpen, Marcel H.Van, “Medvedev’s Proposal for a Pan-
European Securıty Pact; Its Six Hidden Objectives and How the West
Should Respond”, 2009, Ciceron Foundation, www.cicerofoundation.org
/.../Marcel_H_Van_Herpen_Medvedevs_Proposal_for_a_Pan-European_
Security_Pact.pdf, 13 Eylül 09.
Kemp, Walter; “The OSCE: Entering a Third Phase in Its Third
Decade”, Helsinki Monitor 2004 no. 4, s. 254-267.
Lo, Bobo; “Medvedev and the New European Security
Architecture”, www.cer.org.uk/pdf/pbrief_medvedev_july09, 13 Eyl 09.
Markowitz David M.; “Conventional Arms Contol Negotiations
for Today's Europe”, Military & Technology, Harward International
Review, Spring 90, s.49-53.
Oliva, Fabio; “Between Contribution and Disengagement: Post-
Conflict Elections and the OSCE Role in the Normalization of Armed
Groups and Militarized Political Parties in Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Tajikistan, and Kosovo, Helsinki Monitor: Security and Human Rights
2007 no. 3, s.193-207.
Pamela Jawad; “Conflict Resolution through Democracy
Promotion? The Role of the OSCE in Georgia” Democratization, Vol.15,
No.3, June 2008, pp.611–629.
Spitzer, Hartwig; “The Open Skies Treaty: Entering Full
Implementation At a Low Key”, Helsinki Monitor 2006 no. 1, s.83-91.
Stoudmann, Gerard; “The OSCE: Still Relevant to the New
Global Security Environment?” Helsinki Monitor 2005 no. 3, s. 198-203.
Zellner, Wolfgang; “Russia and the OSCE: From High Hopes to
Disillusionment”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Volume
18, Number 3, October, 2005, s.389-402.
Elektronik Kaynaklar
Medvedev’in konuşması için bkz. http://natomission.ru/en/
society/article/society/artnews/21/13 Eyl.09.
http://www.securityconference.de/konferenzen/rede.php?sprach
e=en&id=179,11 Eylül 09.
OSCE Strategy to Address Threats to Security and Stabilityin the
Twenty-First Century, December 03
Mandate of the Advisory and Monitoring Group: PC.DEC/185 of
18 September 1997.
Mandate of the Assistance Group: PC.DEC/35 of 11 April 1995.
23-24 Haziran AGİT 2009 Yıllık Güvenlik gözden Geçirme
Konferansı Lavrov’un Konuşma metni için bkz. http://www.osce.org/
item/38325.html, 13 Eyl 09.
http://www.osce.org/about/13510.html, 13 Eylül 09.
http://www.turksam.org/tr/a1713.html, 13 Eyl 09.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com