Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

DAVID RICARDO İLE JOSEPH ALOIS SCHUMPETER'İN TEKNOLOJİK GELİŞME KURAMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Comparison of Theory of Technological Development by David Ricardo with Joseph Alois Schumpeter

Journal Name:

  • Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, we investigate the theory of technological development of David Ricardo, who handled techological development shaped like using machinery, with Joseph Alois Schumpeter, who considered in the process of invention, innovation, clustering of innovation and creative destruction, by using of comparative methodologies. The scope of this study involves the several differences between Ricardo and Schumpeter in terms of technological development perceptions and determined theoretical purposes. Notwithstanding, being several similarities between theory of technological development ofthese writers have been detected. Although concepts of invention and innovation were used by Schumpeter, traces of these conceptions have been seen in Ricardo before Schumpeter. Ricardo had noticed invention and innovation, different conceptions, before Schumpeter had.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada teknolojik gelişmeyi, makine kullanımı biçiminde ele alan David Ricardo ile teknolojik gelişmeyi, icat, yenilik, yenilik kümelenmesi ve yaratıcı yıkım süreci içerisinde değerlendiren Joseph Alois SchumpeterHn teknolojik gelişme kuramları, karşılaştırmalı bir biçimde incelenmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında Ricardo ve SchumpeterHn teknolojik gelişme kuramları arasında teknolojik gelişme algıları ve kuramsal amaçları bakımından bir takım farklılıklar olduğu belirlenmiştir. Buna karşın, bu iki yazarın teknolojik gelişme kuramları arasında kavramsal düzeyde bir takım benzerlikler olduğu da saptanmıştır. İcat ve yenilik kavramları Schumpeter tarafından kullanılmasına karşın, kavramın izleri Schumpeter'den önce Ricardo'da görülmektedir. Ricardo, Schumpeter'den daha önce icat ile yeniliğin birbirinden farklı kavramlar olduğununfarkına varmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-david-ricardo-ile-joseph-alois-schumpeterin-teknolojik-gelisme-kuramlarinin-karsilastirilmasi.pdf
  • 1
15-40
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

AKYUZ, Yılmaz. (1977), Sermaye, Bölüşüm, Büyüme, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yıyınları, Ankara.
ANDERSEN, S. Esben. (2006), "The Limits of Schumpeter's Business Cycle", Industry and Innovation,
Vol.13, No.l, (March) pp.107-116 BARKAI, Haim. (1986), "Ricardo's Volte-Face on Machinery", TheJournal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No.
3, Part 1 (June), pp. 595-613. BEACH, F. Earl. (1971), "Hicks on Ricardo on Machinery", The Economic Journal, Vol. 81, No. 324
(December), pp. 916-922
Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Cilt 2, Sayı 1, Aralık 2009
David Ricardo
ile
Joseph Alois Schumpeter'in
Teknolojik Gelişme Kuramlarının Karşılaştırılması
BLAUG, Mark. (1958), Ricardian Economics: A Historical Study, Yale University Press, New Haven. BROUWER, Maria. (1991), Schumpeterian Puzzles: Technological Competition and Economic Evolution, The
University of Michigan Press, USA. CLEMENCE, Richard ve FRANCIS S. Doody. (1950), The Schumpeterian System, Addison-Wessley
Press.USA.
DAVIS, J.B. (1991), "Distribution in Ricardo's Machinery Chapter", David Ricardo CriticalAssessments, (Ed.)
John Cunningham Wood, Vol.7, Routledge, London, pp. 256-280. FREEMAN, Chris ve SOETE, Luc. (2003), Yenilik İktisadt, (çev. Ergun Türkcan), Tübitak Yayınları,
Ankara.
GEHRKE, Christian. (2003), "The Ricardo Effect: Its Meaning and Validity", Economica, New Series, Vol.
70, No. 277 (February), pp. 143-158. HANSEN, H. Alvin. (1951), "Schumpeter's Contribution to Business Cycle Theory", The Review of
Economics and Statistics, Vol. 33, No. 2 (May), pp. 129-132. HAYEK, A. v. F. (1942), "The Ricardo Effect", Economica, New Series, Vol. 9, No. 34, (May), pp. 127-152. HAYEK, Av.F. (1969), "Three Elucidations of the Ricardo Effect", TheJournal of Political Economy, Vol. 77,
No. 2, pp. 274-285
HOLLANDER, Samuel. (1966), "Some Technological Relationships in the Wealth of Nations and Ricardo's Principles", The CanadianJournal of Economics and Political Science, Vol. 32, No. 2 (May), pp. 184-201
HOLLANDER, Samuel. (1991), "The Development of Ricardo's Positioan on Machinery", DavidRicardo
CriticalAssessments, (Ed.) John Cunningham Wood, Vol. 2, Routledge, London, pp. 113-135. HUMPHERY, M. Thomas. (2004), "Ricardo Versus Wicksell on Job Losses and Technological
Change", Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, Vol. 90, No. 4 (Fall). JONUNG, Lars. (1981), "Ricardo on Machinery and the Present Unemployment: An Unpublished
Manuscript by Knut Wicksell", The EconomicJournal, Vol. 91, No. 361 (March), pp. 195-198. KURZ, D.H. (1991), "Ricardo and Lowe on Machinery", David Ricardo Critical Assessments, (Ed.) John
Cunningham Wood, Vol. 6, Routledge, London, pp. 88-110. MADARASZ, A (1991), "Schumpeter's Theory of Economic Development",Joseph A. Schumpeter Critical
Assessments, (Ed.) John Cunningham Wood, Vol. 3, Routledge, London. MAHAJAN,VS. (1991), "Schumpeter's Theory of Growth" Joseph A Schumpeter CriticalAssessments, (Ed.)
John Cunningham Wood, Vol. 2, Routledge, London. MAHAL Shlomo ve HASWELL, Patricia. (1977), "Why Did Ricardo (Not) Change His Mind? On
Money and Machinery", Economica, Vol.44, No. 176, (November), pp.359-368. MCNULTY, J. E (1991), "On Firm Size and Innovation in the Schumpeterian System", Joseph A.
Schumpeter Critical Assessments, (Ed.) John Cunningham Wood, Vol. 3, Routledge, London,
pp.77-83.
MORISHIMA Michio. (1989), Ricardo's Economics :A General Equilibrium Theory of Distribution And Growth,
Cambridge University Press, New York. PAL, S. (1991), "Schumpeter and his Ideas on Economic Development", Joseph A. Schumpeter Critical
Assessments, (Ed.) John Cunningham Wood, Vol. 2, Routledge, London, pp.76-89. PARELMAN, Michael. (1995), "Retrospectives: Schumpeter, David Wells, and Creative Destruction",
TheJournal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, No. 3 (Summer), pp. 189-197. RICARDO, David. (2007), Ekonomi Politiğin ve Vergilendirmenin İlkeleri, (çev. Tayfun Ertan), Belge Yayınları,
İstanbul.
Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Cilt 2, Sayı 1, Aralık 2009
Hakan Nairn ARDOR - Serdar VARLIK
ROSENBERG, N. ve FRISCHTAK, R.C. (1991), "Technological Innovation and Long Waves" Joseph A.
Schumpeter Critical Assessments, (Ed.) John Cunningham Wood, Vol. 4, Routledge, London, pp.223-246.
RUTTAN, W Vernon. (1959), "Usher and Schumpeter on Invention, Innovation, and Technological Change", The Quarterlyjoumal of Economics, Vol. 73, No. 4 (November), pp. 596-606.
SAMUELSON, A. Paul. (1988), "Mathematical Vindication of Ricardo on Machinery", The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 96, No. 2 (April), pp. 274-282.
SAMUELSON, A. Paul. (1989), "Ricardo Was Right", ScanâJournal of Economics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 47-62.
SCHUMPETER, A. Joseph. (1927), "The Explanation of the Business Cycle", Economica, No. 21 (December), pp. 286-311.
SCHUMPETER, A. Joseph. (1928), "The Instability of Capitalism", The EconomicJournal, Vol. 38, No. 151 (September), pp. 361-386.
SCHUMPETER, A. Joseph. (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the
Capitalist Process, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. SCHUMPETER, A. Joseph. (1947:a), "The Creative Response in Economic History" JoHraa/ of Economic
History, (November), pp. 149-159. SCHUMPETER, A. Joseph. (1947:b), "Theoretical Problems: Theoretical Problems of Economic
Growth", The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 7, (Supplement: Economic Growth: A
Symposium), pp. 1-9.
SCHUMPETER, A. Joseph. (1961), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Interest, and the Business Cycyle, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.
SCHUMPETER, A. Joseph. (1968),
Kapitalizm,
Sosyalizm ve Demokrasi, Varlık Yayınları, İstanbul.
SCHUMPETER,
A
. Joseph. (1986), History of Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, New\brk
SCHUMPETER, A. Joseph. (2005), "Development", Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 43 (March), pp.108-120.
SHIELDS, R Michael. (1989), "The Machinery Question: Can Technological Improvements Reduce Real
Output", Economica, New Series, Vol. 56, No. 222, (May), pp. 215-224. SOLO, S. Carolyn. (1951), "Innovation in the Capitalist Process: A Critique of the Schumpeterian
Theory", The Quarterlyjoumal of Economics, Vol. 65, No. 3 (August), pp. 417-428. SRAFFA, Piero. (1973), "The Works And Correspondence of David Ricardo; Letters 1816-1818", (Ed.)
Piero Sraffa, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 7. SRAFFA, Piero. (1973), "The Works And Correspondence of David Ricardo; Letters 1819-Junel821",
(Ed.) Piero Sraffa, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 7. STOLPER, F.Wolfgang. (1951), "The Schumpeterian System", TheJournal of Economic History, Vol. 11, No.
3, Part 1 (Summer), pp. 272-277. SWEEZY, M. Paul. (1943), "Professor Schumpeter's Theory of Innovation", The Review of Economics and
Statistics, Vol. 25, No. 1 (February), pp. 93-96. UCHIYAMA, Takashi. (2000), "Ricardo on machinery: a dynamic analysis", European Journal of History of
Economic Thought, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 208-227. WARBURTON, Clark. (1953), "Money and Business Fluctuations in the Schumpeterian System", The
Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 61, No. 6 (December), pp. 509-522.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com