Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

A cross sectional study of assessment of dental anomalies in healthy adolescents

Journal Name:

  • Indian Journal of Basic & Applied Medical Research

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Introduction: The present study evaluated anomalies of tooth formation and eruption in adolescents. This was a cross-sectional study, with the primary data was collected from educational campuses in Pune, Maharashtra. Methodology: Total 1000, healthy male and female subjects between 14-16 years of age were selected for the study and examined for the dental anomalies of malocclusion which were divided into three type viz. dentition, occlusion and space anomalies. Results: Descriptive statistics was done by calculating the Standard error of difference between two proportions. Comparison of outcome parameters was calculated with significance test (‘p’ value). Occlusion anomalies were found to be more predominant, also anomalies were found more commonly in female than male subjects, the difference being statistically significant. Conclusion: Malocclusion is more prevalent in males; however the dentition anomalies are more common in females. We may also conclude that dentition anomalies are more common in female than male.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 1093-1098.pdf.pdf
  • 8
1093-1098
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

1.Kurt H. Thomas, Henry M. Goldman: Oral Pathology. 5th edition. The C. V. Mosby company ,S.Louies , 23-73,
1960-1967
2.Atwan S.M., Turner D., Khalid A.: Early Interventation toremove mesodena and avoid orthodontic therapy. Gen.
Dent.2000 -Apr 48 (2) 166-169.
3. Winter G. B.: Anomalies of tooth formation and eruption,Paediatricdenstistry, 1997, 1st edition Oxford
University Press,251-270.
4. Buschang PH, Thrackmork G. S.: Does malocclusion affectmasticatory performance. Angle orthod. 2002 Feb, 72
(1): 21 – 27.
5. Bijlstra K. G. The role of orthodontics in dental health servicefor children Am. J. Orthod 62 Vol. II 100-106.
6. Doler :Statisticl Survey of the deficient dentition (Abst. From paper published Schweiz.Monastschr, Zahnla Dent
Dec. 57:56, 1935. Seipal C. M. Variation of tooth position, Svensktabdl-hdskr, 39 Supp. 1946.
7. Sven Helm: Malocclusion in Danish children with adolescent dentition. A epidemiologic study. Am. J.
Orthodontics volume 54 Number 5 Mat, 1968 ,40-47
8. Seipal C. M. Variation of tooth position, Svensktabdl-hdskr,39 Supp. 1946 , 50-57.
Indian Journal of Basic & Applied Medical Research; September 2013: Issue-8, Vol.-2, P.1093-1098
1098
www.ijbamr.com
9. Schweitzer G.,Zur Frags der erbichen, Bendingtheit desisolierten und SymetrischenI: 236, 1934.
10. Winter G. B.: Anomalies of tooth formation and eruption,Paediatricdenstistry, 1997, 1st edition Oxford
University Press,251-270.
11. LauryMitchell: Cross bite, An introduction to orthodontics,Oxford University Press Inc. New York, 1996 First
Edition130-137.
12. Mills L. F., 1455 School children in dental arech. DimensionsExpressed on the basis of tooth eruption as a
measure of biologicage. J. D. Res., 44 : 120-141, 1965.
13. Munblatt M. A.: A statistical study of dental occlusion inchildren D Items Interest 65 : 43-63, 1943.
14. Miyosh S., Tanaka S., Kunimatsu H.: An epidemiologicalstudy of supernumerary primary teeth in Japanese
children. Areview of racial differences in the prevalence. Oral Dis 2000Mar6 (2): 92-102.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com