Buradasınız

Generation of Spatially Varying Ground Motion Based on Response Spectrum using Artificial Neural Networks

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
During an earthquake, the motion of the ground spatially changes, in both amplitude and phase. The spatial variation of seismic ground motions has an important effect on the response of large structures such as bridges and dams. To be able to simulate seismic ground motions which vary in space, a representing spatial variability model is required. Data collected from closely spaced arrays of seismographs such as SMART-1 array in Loting, Taiwan have enabled researchers to produce useful spatial variability models to model spatial excitation. In this paper a simulation technique for the generation of artificial spatially variable seismic ground motions was presented using Arterial Neural Networks (ANNs). A simplified neural network based procedure was used to generate artificial spatial varying accelerograms from the response spectrum of an earthquake.
45
49

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Harichandran, RS, And Wang, W. (1988), Response of a simple beam to a spatially varying earthquake excitation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,. ASCE 114(9), pp 1526-1541.
[2] Zerva, A. Zervas, V. (2002), Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: An overview. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 55(3), pp 271-297.
[3] Harichandran, R.S., And Vanmark, E. (1986), Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE 112, pp 154-174.
[4] Perotti, F. (1990), Structural response to non-stationary multiple-support random excitation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 19, pp 513-527.
[5] Nazmy, A.S., Abdel-Ghaffar, A.M. (1992), Effects of ground motion spatial variability on the response of cable-stayed bridges. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 21, pp 1-20.
[6] Der Kiureghian, A, and Neuenhofer, A. (1992), Response spectrum method for multiple-support seismic excitation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 21, pp 712-740.
[7] Kahan, M, Gibert, R.J., Bard, P.Y. (1996), Influence of seismic waves spatial variability on bridges: a sensitivity analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 25, pp 795-814.
[8] Maheri, M.R. and Ghaffarzadeh, H. (1992), Asynchronous and non-uniform support excitation analysis of large structures. J. of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering. JSEE 4(2&3), pp 63-74.
[9] Shinozuka, M. (1972), Monte Carlo solution of structural dynamics. Computers and Structures, 2, pp 855-874.
[10] Yang, J.N. (1972), Simulations of random envelope processes. Journal of Sound & Vibration. 25, pp 73-85.
[11] Shinozuka, M. (1987), Stochastic fields and their digital simulation, Stochastic Methods in Structural Dynamics. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
[12] Zerva, A. (1992), Seismic ground motion simulations from a class of spatial variability models. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 21, pp 351-361.
[13] Kawakami, H. and Sharma, S. (1999), Statistical study of spatial variation of response spectrum using free field records of dense strong ground motion arrays. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 28, pp 1273-1294.
[14] Shama, A. (2007), Simplified procedure for simulating spatially correlated earthquake ground motions. Engineering Structures, 29, pp 248-258.
[15] Ghaboussi, J, Lin. C-C.J. (1998), New method of generating spectrum compatible accelerograms using neural networks. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 27, pp 377–396.
[16] Lee, S.C. and Han, S.W. (2002), Neural-network-based models for generating artificial earthquakes and response spectra. Computers and Structures 80, pp 1627–1638.
[17] Haykin, S. (1994), Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
[18] Specht, D.F. (1991), A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2(6), pp 568–576.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com