Buradasınız

OECD ÜLKELERİ İÇİN EKONOMİK YAKINSAMA ÖNGÖRÜSÜNÜN ZAMAN SERİSİ PANEL BİRİM KÖK YÖNTEMLERİ İLE SINANMASI

AN ESSAY UPON TESTING ECONOMICCONVERGENGE HYPOTHESIS WITH TIME SERIES PANEL UNIT ROOT METHODS FOR THE OECD COUNTRIES

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this paper the convergence hypothesis based on the neo-classical growth theory is tried to be re-examined by using per capita real income data of 26 OECD countries. Considering some contemporaneous panel unit root tests for the 1970 – 2007 sample period, the main findings obtained indicate that we are unable to reject that the per capitareal income levels of OECD countries converge to the USA per capita real income level, chosen as the benchmark country. However, when the convergence of per capita real income levels of OECD countries tothe average of OECD per capita real income level is considered, the panel unit root null hypothesis is seen to be supported by the actual data.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada neo-klasik büyüme kuramına dayalıyakınsama öngörüsü 26 OECD ülkesine ait kişi başına reel gelir verileri kullanılarak yeniden incelenmeye çalışılmaktadır.Çağdaşbazıpanel birim kök sınamalarıdikkate alınarak 1970 – 2007 örneklem dönemi için elde edilen temel bulgular OECD ülkeleri kişi başına reel gelir düzeylerinin lider ülke olarak seçilen ABD kişi başına reel gelir düzeyine yakınsamasının reddedilemediğini göstermektedir. Buna karşılık, OECD ülkeleri kişi başına reel gelir düzeylerinin OECD ortalama kişi başına reel gelir düzeyine yakınsamasının dikkate alınmasıdurumunda panel birim kök sıfır varsayımının gerçek veriler tarafından desteklendiği görülmektedir.
189-206

REFERENCES

References: 

Barro, R.J. ve Sala-i-Martin, X, (1991), “Convergence across States and Regions”,
Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 107-58.
Barro, R.J. ve Sala-i-Martin, X., (1992), “Convergence”, Journal of Political
Economy, 100/2, April, 223-51.
Barro, R.J. ve Sala-i-Martin, X., (1995), Economic Growth, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Baumol, W.J., (1986), “Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: What the
Long-run Data Show”, American Economic Review, 76/5, Dec., 1072-085.
Bernard, A.B. ve Durlauf, S.N., (1995), “Convergence in International Output”,
Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10/2, Apr. – Jun., 97-108.
Bernard, A.B. ve Durlauf, S.N., (1996), “Interpreting Tests of the Convergence
Hypothesis”, Journal of Econometrics, 71, 161-73.
Bernard, A.B. ve Jones, C.I., (1996), “Productivity across Industries and Countries:
Time Series Theory and Evidence”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 78/1, Feb.,
135-46.
Boussemart, J.-P., Briec, W., Cadoret, I.ve Tavera, C., (2006), “A Re-examination
of the Technological Catching-up Hypothesis across OECD Industries”, Economic
Modelling, 23, 967-77.
203
Levent Korap
Cass, D., (1965), “Optimum Growth in an Aggregative Model of Capital
Accumulation”, Review of Economic Studies, 32, 233-40.
Cheung, Y.-W. ve Pascual, A.G., (2004), “Testing for Output Convergence: A Re-examination”, Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 45-63.
Choi, I., (2001), “Unit Root Tests for Panel Data”, Journal of International Money
and Finance, 20, 249-72.
De Long, J.B., (1988), “Productivity Growth, Convergence and Welfare:
Comment”, American Economic Review, 78, 233-40.
Dowrick, S. ve Nguyen, D.-T., (1989), “OECD Comparative Economic Growth
1950-85: Catch-up and Convergence”, American Economic Review, 79/5, Dec.,
1010-030.
Evans, P., (1996), “Using Cross-country Variances to Evaluate Growth Theories”,
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 20, 1027-049.
Evans, P., (1997), “How Fast Do Economies Converge?”, Review of Economics and
Statistics, 79/2, May, 219-25.
Evans, P., (1998), “Using Panel Datato Evaluate Growth Theories”, International
Economic Review, 39/2, May, 295-306.
Evans, P. ve Karras, G., (1996a), “Convergence Revisited”, Journal of Monetary
Economics, 37, 249-65.
Evans, P. ve Karras, G., (1996b), “Do Economies Converge? Evidence from a Panel
of U.S. States”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 78/3, Aug., 384-88.
Fisher, R.A., (1932), Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 4
th
ed.,
Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
Friedman, M., (1992), “Do Old Fallacies Ever Die?”, Journal of Economic
Literature, 30/4, 2129-132.
Guetat, I. ve Serranito, F., (2007), “Income Convergence within the MENA
Countries: A Panel Unit Root Approach”, Quarterly Review of Economics and
Finance, 46, 685-706.
Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H. ve Shin, Y., (2003), “Testing for Unit Roots in
Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-74.
204
Istanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Yıl:9 Sayı:17 Bahar 2010 s.189-206
Islam, N., (1995), “Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach”, Quarterly Journal
of Economics, 110/4, Nov., 1127-170.
Jones, C.I., (1998), Introduction to Economic Growth, NY: W.W. Norton &
Company, Inc.
Kocenda, E., (2001), “Macroeconomic Convergence in Transition Countries”,
Journal of Comparative Economics, 29, 1-23.
Koopmans, T.C., (1965), On the Concept of Optimal Economic Growth, içerisinde
The Economic Approach to Development Planning, Pontifical Academy of
Sciences, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Kutan, A.M. ve Yiğit, T.M., (2004), “Nominal and Real Convergence of Transition
Economies”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 32, 23-36.
Kutan, A.M. ve Yiğit, T.M., (2005), “Real and Nominal Stochastic Convergence:
Are the New EU Members Ready to Join the Euro Zone?”, Journal of Comparative
Economics, 33, 387-400.
Levin, A., Lin, C.F. ve Chu, C., (2002), “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic
and Finite-sample Properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1-24.
Lichtenberg, F.R., (1994), “Testing the Convergence Hypothesis”, Review of
Economics and Statistics, 76/3, Aug., 576-79.
Maddala, G.S. ve Wu, S., (1999), “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with
Panel Data and a New Simple Test”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,
61, 631-52.
Mankiw, N.G., Romer, D. ve Weil, D.N., (1992), “A Contribution to the Empirics
of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107/2, May, s. 407-37.
Murthy, N.R.V. ve Ukpolo, V. (1999), “A Test of the Conditional Convergence
Hypothesis: Econometric Evidence from African Countries”, Economics Letters, 65,
249-53.
Parasız, İ., (1997), Modern Büyüme Teorileri: Dinamik Makro Ekonomiye
Giriş, Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi Yayınları.
Quah, D., (1993), “Galton’s Fallacy and Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis,
Scand. J. of Economics, 95/4, 427-43.
Rassekh, F., (1998), “The Convergence Hypothesis: History, Theory, and
Evidence”, Open Economies Review, 9, 85-105.
205
Levent Korap
206
Rassekh, F., Panik, M.J. ve Kolluri, B.R., (2001), “A Test of the Convergence
Hypothesis: The OECD Experience, 1950-1990”, International Review of
Economics and Finance, 10, 147-57.
Saraçoğlu, B. ve Doğan, N., (2005), “Avrupa Birliği Ülkeleri ve Avrupa Birliğine
Aday Ülkelerin Yakınsama Analizi”, 7. Ulusal Ekonometri ve İstatistik
Sempozyumuna Sunulan Tebliğ, 26-27 Mayıs, İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi.
Solow, R.M., (1956), “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”,
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65-94.
Swan, T.W., (1956), “Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation”, Economic
Record, 32, 334-61.
Wong, W.-K. (2006), “OECD Convergence:A Sectoral Decomposition Exercise,
Economics Letters, 93, 210-14.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com