Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

ÖRTÜLÜ KAPANIŞ TEDAVİLERİNİN PEKİŞTİRME SONRASI DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

POSTTREA TMENT ASSESMENT OF DEEP BİTE TREATMENT

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1994

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study was conducted to determine the factors causing relapse following deep-bite treatment. The study group for individuals comprised of 24 female, 10 male subjects 0/ whom 19 were rendered extraction and 15 non-extraction orthodontic treatment. The longitudinal research was carried out on lateral cepalograms of subjects which were taken prior to and subsequent to orthodontic treatment. It was concluded that the correction of deepbite was attained solely in the dentoaveolar level and the position of lower incisor was crucial in this process. The result of the study pointed out the key role of lower incisor position in the retention of deep-bite.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Deep-bite olgularının geri dönmesinden sorumlu olan etkenlerin araştırılması çalışmamızın amacını oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmamızın 19'u çekimli, 15'i çekimsiz tedavi edilmiş 24'ü kız, lö'u erkek toplam 34 bireyin tedavi sonrası ve pekiştirme dönemlerinde alman sefalogramları üzerinde longitudinal olarak yürütülmüştür. Araştırmamızın sonucu Örtülü kapanış pekiştirmesinde alt keser konumunun önemini vurgulamaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ortulu-kapanis-tedavilerinin-pekistirme-sonrasi-degerlendirilmesi.pdf
  • 2
113
124
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Amott RD. A serial study of dental arche measurements on orthodontic subject. M.S. thesis, St. Louis, 1962. Alınmıştır: Simons ME, Joondeph DR. Cange in overbite: A ten year posttreat-ment study. Am J Orthod 1973: 64: 349-66.
2. Bishara SE, Chadha JM, Potter R B. Stability of intercanine width overbite and overjet correction. Am J Orthod 1973: 63: 588-93.
3. Bresonis WL, Grewe JM. Treatment and post treatment changes in orthodontic cases: overbite and overjet. Angle Orthot 1974: 44: 290-99.
4. Cole HJ. Certain results of extraction in the teratment of malocclusion. Angle Ortodont 1948:18: 103-13.
5. Dougherty HL. Failures in ortodontics. Trans Eur Ortod Soc 1973: 231-42.
6. El-Mangoury NH. Ortodontic relapse in subjects wit varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplassia. Am J Orthod 1979: 75; 548-61.
7. Engel G, Conford G, Damarell JM. Treatment of deep bite cases. Am J Ortod 1980: 77: 1-13.
8. Graber TM. Postmortems in posttreatment adjustment. Am J Orthod 1966: 52:331-5.
9. Hechter FJ. Symmetry form and dimension of the dental arches of orthodontically treated patients. M.S. Thesis, Univ. of
Manitoba, 1975. Alınmıştır: Sondhi A, Cleall JF, BeGole EA. Dimensional changes in the dental arche of orthodontically treated cases. Am J Orthod 1980: 77: 60-74.
10. Hellekant M, Langerström L, Gleerup A. Overbite and overjet correction in class II division 1 sample treated with edgewise therapy. Eur/ Orthod 1989:11: 91-106.
11. Hernandez JL. Mandibular bicanine width relative to overbite. Am J Orthod 1969: 56: 455-62.
12. Litowitz R. A study of the movement of certain teet during and following ortodontic tretment. Angle Orthod 1948: 18: 1139-32.
13. Ludwig M. A cepalometric analysis of te relationship between facial pattern interincisal angulation and anterior overbite canges. Angle Orthod 1967: 37: 196-204.
14. Magill JM. Canges in te anterior overbite relationsip following ortodontic treatment in extraction cases. Am J Ortod 1960: 46: 755-88.
15. Merson JV. Possibilities and limitations İn te treatment of closed bites./«// Ortod 1937: 23: 581-89.
16. Otto RL, Anolm JM, Engel GA. A comparactive analysis of intrusion of incisor teet acieved in adults and children according to facial type. Am J Orthod 1980: 77: 437-66.
17. Popowic F. Cepalometric evaluation of vertical overbite in
124
M. Demirhanoğlu, A. Enarcar, Af. Özgen
young adults./CanadDent 1955: 21:209-22.
18. Reidel RA. A review of retention problem. Angle Ortod 1960:30: 179-93.
19. Ricketts
RM
, Bene RW, Gugino CFf ilgers JJ, Sculof RJ. Bioprogressive terapy Rocky Mountain Ortodontics, Cilt 1, Denver, 1979.
20. Salzmann JA. Ortodontics in daily practive. Piladelpia: JB Lippİncott: 1974.
21. Scudy FF. Te control of vertical overbite in clinical orto-dontics.A/igfe Ortod 1968: 38: 19-39.
22. Sondi A, Cleall JF, BeGole EA. Dimensional changes in te
dental arces. Am J Ortod 1980: 77: 60-74.
23. Stackler M. Clinical observations of cases 5 years after out of treatment. Angle Ortod 1958: 28:108.
24. Steİner CC. Cephalometrİcs İn clinical practice. Angle Orthod 1959: 29: 8-17.
25. Thopson A. A cephalometric evaluation of vertical dimension. Am J orthod 1966: 52: 859-60.
26. Udhe MD, Sadowsky C, BeGole EA. Longterm stability of dental relationship after orthodontic treatmen. Angle Ortod 1983:53:240-52.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com