Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

KANİN VE 1. PREMOLARLARDAKİ KAMA DEFEKTLERÎNİN YAŞ, CİNSİYET VE DİŞ FIRÇALAMA SIKLIĞINA GÖRE DAĞILIMININ İNCELENMESİ

THE INVESTIGATION OF THE PREVELANCE OF WEDGE-SHAPE DEFECTS ON THE CANIN AND 1. PREMOLARS WITH RELATED TO AGE AND SEX OF PATIENTS AND FREQUENCY OF TOOTH BRUSHING

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1997
Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In the present study the prevalence of wedge - shape defects on 1710 teeth of patients who applied to the Univesity of Istanbul. Faculty of Densitry, Department of Conservative Dentistry for management of their dental caries were evaluated, defects were recorded by using 0.1. and 2 scores. Tooth number, age and sex of patients and frequency of toothbrus-hing were chosen as the criteriesfor lis evaluation. For statistical analysis, Chi-squate test was performed to compare the differences betwen the erouiw. It it concluded that there is no statistically significant differences betwen upper and lower teeth. On the other hand, no statistically significant differences between males and females in 10-29 30-49 and 5049 eroute was found In conslusion, it is surmised thai increased with increasing age and frequence oftoothbrus-hing have promoted 'the occurence of these lesions.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada İ.Ü. Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Konservatif Diş Tedavisi Bilim dalına başvuran, yaşlan 10 ile 69 arasında değişen 230 hastanın kanin ve premolar olmak Üzere 1710 dişinde kama def ektinin görülme sildiği değerlendirilmiştir. Bu değerlendirmede, diş numa¬ralan, hasta yaşı ve cinsiyeti, günlük diş fırçalama sildiği kriterleri esas alınmıştır. Hazırlanan standart bilgi formu, her hastadan alınan bilgilere göre doldurulduktan sonra, kama defektlerİnin varlığı a-)0 (lezyon yok); b-) 1 (sondun takıldığı lezyon); o) 2 (gözle görülebilen, sklerotik dentin bulunan lezyon) skorlarına göre değerlendirilmiş ve elde edilen veriler kaydedilmiştir. Çalışmanın bulgularının istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmesinde Xs testi kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak; üst ve alt çenede kanin ve 1.premolar dişleri arasında kama def ektlerinin sıklığı açısından anlamlı bir fark tespit edilmemiştir. Kama defektlerİnin değişik yaş gruplarındaki cinslere göre dağılımı açısından da anlamlı bir fark bulunamazken; diş fırçalama sıklığının artmasıyla kama defeküerininVaygınlığmın da arttığı tespit edilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-kanin-1.premolarlardaki-kama-defektlerinin-yas-cinsiyet-dis-fircalama-sikligina-gore-dagiliminin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 4
199
204
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. BaderJD, Levitch LC, Shugars DA, Heymann HO, McClure F. How dentists classified and treated non-canous cervical lesions./^ra Dent Assoc 1993:124:46-54.
2. BergströmJ, Eliasson S. Cervical abrasion in relation to toothbrushing and periodontal health. Scand J Dent Res 1988:96:405-11.
3. BergströmJ, Laustedt S. An epidemiologic approach to toothbrushing and dental abrasion. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1979:7:57-64.
4. Bevenius J,L'Estrange P, Karlsson S, Carlsson GK. Idiopathic cervical lesions: in vivo investigation by oral micro-
204
Yıldız E Koray F Demirci M
endoscopy and scanning electron microscopy. A pilot study. J Oral Rahabil 1993:20:1-9.
5. Brady JM, Woody RD. Scanning microscopy of cervical erosion./Am Dent Assoc 1977:94:726-29.
6. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Stress - induced cervical lesions. JProsthet Dent 1992:67:718-22.
7. Kitchin PC. The prevalence of tooth root exposure and the relation of the extent of such exposure to the degree of abrasion in different age classes./ Dent Res 1941:20:565¬81.
8. Klimm W, Herbert J, Bohm B et al. Klinische Valriati-onen des sogenannten keilformigen Defckts. Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd 1990:78:713-16.
9. KodakaT, Kuroiwa M, Kobori M. Scanning laser microscopic surface profiles of human enamel and dentin after brushing with abrasive dentifrice in vitro. Scanning Microsc 1993:7:247-54.
10. König KG. Root lesions. Int Dent71990:40:283-88.
11. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. JProsthet Dent 1984:52:374-80.
12. Levitch LC, BaderJD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non carious cervical lesions./£)en(1994:22:195-207.
13. Manly RS, Foster DH. Importance of factorial designs in testing abrasion by dentifrices. J Dent Res 1967:46:442-45.
14. Mannerberg F. Changes in the enamel surface in cases of erosion: a replica study. Arch Oral Biol 1961:4:59-62.
15. Natusch J, Klimm W. Chronischer Zahnhartsubs-tanz - verlust im frühen and mitderen Erwachsenenaher. Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd 1989:77:123-27.
16. Ott RW, Ncudcrt T, Raab WH, Boegershausen HM, Einflusse der Zahnputztechnik auf die Entstehung kcilför-miger Defekte. Dtsch Stomatol 1991:41:463-65.
17. PindborgJJ. Pathology of the dental hard tissues. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 1970.
18. Radentz WH, Barnes GP, Cutright DE. A survey of factors possibly associated with cervical abrasion of tooth surfaces. J Periodontal 1976:47:148-154.
19. Sangnes G, Gjermo P. Prevalence of oral soft tissue and hard tissue lesions related to mechanical toothclean-sing procedures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1976:4:77-83.
20. Sangnes G. Traumatization of teeth and gingiva re~ lated to habitual tooth cleaning procedures./ Oin Periodon ton976:3:94-103.
21. SognnaesRF, WolcottRB, Xhonga FA. Dental erosion I. Erosion - like patterns occuring in association with other dental conditions.y^m Dent Assoc 1972:84:571-76.
22. Xhonga FA, Valdmanis S. Geographic comparisons of the incidence of dental erosion: a two centre study./ Oral ifefta&;n983:10:269-77.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com