Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

AMALGAM RESTORASYONLARDA ONARIM

REPAIR OF AMALGAM RESTORATION

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Amalgam restorations have been widely used since the end of the last century, and is stil being used by todays dentists due to their easy manipulation, low coast, adequate mechanical properties and longevity. Today in order to raise the clinical performance of restorations more emphasis is given on researches on either material qualities or restorations tecniqucs. Moreover the goal of these research is focused on extending the life of a restoration and preserving its clinical performance during this period. Extending the clinical life of a restoration is important for preserving tooth structure as well as economically. The procedure of keeping the tooth structure loss during a restorative treatment is called " Minimal Invasive Treatment Concept". The researches about this concept is focused on the elements that ensure the success of this treatment.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amalgam restorasyonlar geçen yüzyılın sonundan heri dişhckimliğindc yaygın bir şekilde kullanılmış, kolay manipülasyonlan, yeterli mekanik özellikleri, ucuz maliyetleri ve uzun ömürleri nedeniyle günümüz dişhckiinleri tarafından da bir çok vak'a da tercih edilmektedir. Günümüzde restorasyonların klinik performanslarının yükseltilmesi için gerek malzemelerin niteliklerine, gerekse restorasyonların yapım tekniklerinin geliştirilmesine yönelik çalışmalara verilen önem artmaktadır. Bunların yanı sıra yapılan restorasyonların uzun süre klinik performanslarının korunması, ağız ortamında kalma süresini uzatmak ve diş dokusundaki kayıpları minimalde tutmak hedeflenmektedir. Restorasyonun ömrünün uzatılması ekonomik yararın yanı sıra kadar diş dokularının korunması açısından da büyük önem taşımaktadır. Operatif ve restoratif işlemler sonucunda diş dokularından madde kaybının en az düzeyde tutulması "Minimal Inva7İf Tedavi Konsepti" olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu konscpl üzerinde yapılan araştırmalarda restorasyonun başarısını sağlayacak öğelerin ayrıntılarına inilmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-amalgam-restorasyonlarda-onarim.pdf
  • 1-2
47
53
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Tobi H, Kreulen CM, Vondeling H, van Amerongen WE. Cost-effectiveness of composite resins and amalgam in the replacement of amalgam Class II restorations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999 Apr; 27 (2): 137-43
2. York AK, Arthur JS. Reasons for placement and replacement of dental restorations in the United States Navy Dental Corps. Oper Dent. 1993 Sep-Oct; 18 (5):203-8.
3. Kamann WK, Gangler P. Filling repair and repair fillings Scliweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2000; 110 (10): 1054-71
4. Mjör IA. Repair versus replacement of failed restorations. Int Dent J 1993; 43:466-472
5. Mjör I A, Jokstad A, Qvist V. Longevity of posterior restorations. hit Dent J 2001; 40:11-17
6. Mjor I A. Qvist V. Marginal failures of amalgam and composite restorations. J Dent. 1997 Jan;25(l):25-30.
7. Mjor IA, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Italy. Oper Dent. 1992 Mar-Apr; 17(2):70
8. Mjör IA. Placament and replacement of restorations. Oper Dent 1981;6:49-54
9. Mjor IA ,Qvist J, Qvist V. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand. 1990 Oct; 48 (5):297-303
10. Mjor I A, Gordan VV. Failure, Repair, Refurbishing and Longevity of Restorations. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 528-534
11. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V.(2003) Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent. 2003 Aug; 31(6): 395-405
12. Forss H, Widstrom E. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults. Acta Odontol Scand. 2004 Apr; 62(2): 82-6.
13.
Demirci M, Koray F, Turan N. Sekonder ve residüel çürük sıklığı İ.Ü Diş. Hek. Fak. Der. 2000; Vol 33 S 93-106
14. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent. 2001 Spring; 3 (l):45-64.
15. Elderton RJ. Restorations without conventional cavity preparations. Int Dent J. 1988 Jun;38 (2): 112-8.
16. Paterson FM, Paterson RC, Watts A, Blinkhorn AS. Initial stages in the development of valid criteria for the replacement of amalgam restorations. J Dent. 1995 Jun; 23 (3): 137-43.
17. Charton DG, Moore BK. Invitro evaluation of the use of resin liners toreduce mikroleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations.Ope/-. Dent. 1992; 17:112-119
18. Staninec M.Truong PT, Lowe A,Watanabe LG.Improved amalgam bonding resin tested in tension and retention J Dent Res 1993; 72:226
19. Swift EJ, Triolo M.Shear bond strength oflO dentin adhesives.De/ır A/«r/ır.î 1992;.8: 370-374
20. KlineJ Boyer. Comparasion of bonding amalgam& composites to enamal and dentin. Dent Res 1995; 74 spcl absp 104
21. Ratakanin T, Vargas R, Deheny T. Effect of condensation tecnique on amalgam bond strength to dentin J Dent Res 1995: 74:513
Amalgam
Restorasyonlard
a Onarım
53
22. Ramos JC & Perdiago J () Amalgam bond strength using current adhesives. Journal Dental Research 1997; 76 Abst 67 429
23. Diefenderfer KE, Reinhardt JW, CobbSB. Shear bond strengths of 10 adhesives resin / amalgam combinations Oper Dent 1997; 23: 50-56
24. Grobler SR, Oberholzer GT, Rossouw RJ, Van Wyk Kotze TJ. Shear bond strength,microleakage and confocal studies of 4 amalgam alloy bonding agents. Quintesssence Int 2000; 31: 511-515
25. Al-Neme. DB, Evans F, Maxom BB. Evalution of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composites restorationsxomparasion of microleakage and bond strength Oper Dent. 2000; 25,512-519
26. Wilson N.H.F, Setcos J:C: Brunton P. Repalcement or Repair of d Dental Restorations. Advences in Operative Dentistry Challenges of The Future 2001 Volume 2, 7th ed. 105-115
27. Terkla LG, Mahler,DB. Bond strength of repired amalgam../ Prosthet Dent 1961; 11: 942¬947
28. Jorgensen KD, Saito T. Bond strength of repaired amalgam. Acta Odontol Scand 1968; 26: 605-615
29. Consani S.Ruhnke LA, Stolf W. Infiltration of a radioactive solution into joined silver amalagam. J Prosthet Dent 1977; 37: 158-163
30. Gordon M, Ben-Amar A, Librus S, Liberman R. Bond strength of mecanically condensed repaired high copper amalgam. Quintessence Int 1987;18:471-474
31. Hibler JA.Foor JL, Miranda FJ. Bond strength comparasions of repaired dental amalgams. Quintesssence Int 1988; 19: 411- 415
32. Erkes EO, Burgess JO. Amalgam repair .an in vitro evaluation of bond integrity. Gen Dent Res 1990:38: 203 203-205
33. Liberman R, Ben-Amar A, Gordon M. the effecet of new adhesives on joint strength of repaired amalgams. J Dent Res. 1990; 69: 1035
34. Hoise MA, Miranda FJ, Duncanson MG. Effect of amalgambond on flexural bond strength of amalgam. J Dent Res. 1991; 70: 300 Abst No: 227
35. Hadavi F, Hey JH, Ambrose ER. Bonding amalgam to denUn.Oper Dent 1993; 18: 2-7
36. Leelawat C, Scherer W,Chang J. Additons of fresh amalgam to existing amalgam: microleakage study. J Esthet Dent. 1992; 4: 44¬47
37. Dörter C, Koray F, Duman İ. Flexural bond strength of amalgam repair. J Dent Res 1998; 77:1227, abstract no: 167
38. Terry JF, Duncanson MG, Coury T. Interfacial bond strength of amalgam bonded to amalgam and resin composite bonded to amalgam. Quintesssence Int 1998; 29: 411- 415
39. Jessup JP,WandewalIe KS, Hermesch CB, Buıkema DJ. Effects of surface treatments on amalgam repair. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 15-20
40. Giannini M, Paullillo LAMS,Ambrosano GMB. Effect of surface roughness on amalgam repair using adhesive systems. Brazil Dent 2002; 13 (3): 179:183
41. Özer F, Ünlü N, Sengün A, Öztürk B. Amalgam repair: evaluation of bond strength and Microleakage. Oper Dent. 2002; 27: 199-203

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com