Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

ÜST BİLİŞSEL DÜZEYLERİ YÜKSEK VE DUŞUK ÖĞRENCİLERİN EBEVEYN TUTUMLARININ İNCELENMESİ

Investigation of Parenting Style of the Parents of Students with High and Low Levels of Metacognition

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Psikoloji Çalışmaları Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, parenting styles of the parents of students with high and low levels of metacognition were compared. Total of 305 high school students participated in the study. Highest and lowest quartiles were determined to calassify out the students as high and low metacognition groups (n: 168). To assess metacognition, Metacognitive Inventory, developed by Çetinkaya and Erktin (2002) and to determine the parenting styles, PARI, adapted by Compte, Compte and Özer (1978) was used. According to the results, metacognitive levels of students are affected by mothers' strict discipline and rejecting house-wife role but other parenting style characteristics have no effect on metacognitive levels of students.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmada üst bilişsel düzeyleri yüksek ve düşük Öğrencilerin ebeveyn tulumları karşıt'aştırıl'iniştir. Bu amaçla 305 lise öğrencisinden veri toplanmış ve dağılımın alt ve üst çeyrektik dilimleri belirlenerek üst bilişsel düzeyleri yükseli ve düşük olan öğrenciler saptanmıştır (n:168). Üst bilişsel düzeyi belirlemek üzere Çetinkaya ve Erktin(2002) tavafından geliştirilen Bilişötesi Ölçeği; çocuk yetiştirme biçimlerini belirlemek üzere Compte, Compte ve Özer (1978) tarafından uyarlanan PARI kullanılmıştır. Bulgulara göre üst bilişsel düzeyi yüksek ve düşük grupların annelerinin çocuk yetiştirme tutumları arasında ev kadınlığını reddetme ve sıkı disiplin bakımından fark bulunmakta ancak diğer çocuk yetiştirme tutumları bakımından bir farklılaşma görülmemektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ust-bilissel-duzeyleri-yuksek-dusuk-ogrencilerin-ebeveyn-tutumlarinin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 1
45-56
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Alexander, J.M., Johnson, K.E., Albano, J., Freygang, T.& Scott,B.(2006) Relations Between intelligence and the development of metaconceptual knowledge, Metacognition and Learning 1,51 -67.
Aunola, K., Stattın, H.& Nurmi, J-E.(2000). Parenting Styles and adolescent's achievement strategics, Journal of Adolescence, 23, 205-222.
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other mysterious mechanisms. F. E. Weinert and R. H. Kiuwe (Ed.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding, (ss. 65-116). Hillsdale New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bruning,R.R, Schraw,G.J., Norby, M.M.&Ronning,R.R. (2004). Cognitive Psyhology and Instruction, 4th.Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall.
Carr, M., Kurtz,B., Schneider,W., Turner,L. & Burkowski, J.(1989) Strategy Acquisition and transfer among American and German Children : Enviromental Influences on Metocognitive Development, Developmental Psyhology, 25, 765-771.
Çetinkaya,
P
. & Erktin, E. (2002) Assessment of metacognition and its relationship with reading romprehension, achievement, and aptitude. Boğaziçi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19 (1), 3-11.
Cherney, i.
(2003)
. Young Children's Spontaneous Utterances of Mental Terms and the Accuracy of their Memory Behavior: A Different Methodological Approach, Infant and Child Development, 12:89-105.
ÜST BİLİŞSEL DÜZEYLERİ YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK ÖĞRENCİLERİN..
55
Compte.A., Compte, G.& Özer, S. (1978) Üç sosyo ekonomik düzeyde Ankaralı annelerin çocuk yetiştirme tutumları: Bir ölçek uyarlaması, Psikoloji Dergisi, 1, 5-9.
dc Carvalho
Fitho
, M.K.& Yuzawa,M.(2001) The Effects of Social inflences and General Metacognitive Knowledge on Metamemory Judgements, Contemporary Educational Pysciıology, 26(4), 571-587.
Efklides, A.(2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experincnecs tell us about learning process?. Educational Research Rewiew, 1(1), 3-14.
Efklides, A.& Petkaki, C.(2005) Effects of mood on students' metacognitive experiences, Learning and Instruction, 15,4! 5-431.
Efklides, A.& Tstora, A.(2002). Metacognitive Experiences, self-concept, and self-regulation, Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 45, 222-236.
Fiese, B. (2001) Family Matters: Asystcms View of Family Effects on Children's Cognitive Health, Ed: Steinberg R.J.&Grigorenko,E.L.(2001) Enviromental Effects on Cognitive Abilities, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
Flavell, J. H. (1987) Speculation about the nature and development of metacognition. F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (ss,21 - 29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Garner, R & Alexander, P. A. (1989) Metacognition: Answered and unanswered questions. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 143-158.
Georghiades, P. (2004). From the general to the situated: Three decades of metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26, No. 3, 365-383.
Hackcr,D.(1998). Definations and Emprical Foundations, Ed: Hacker,D„ Dunlosky,!, Gracsser, A., Metacogniton: Educational Theory and Practise, Erlbaum, London.
Kovac-Cerovic, T. (1996). How Can We As Parents and EducatorsFoster Metacognitive Development, Childhood Education, 172-184.
Karabenick, S.A.(1996) Social Influences on Metacognition: Effects of Colearnar Questionning on Comprehension Monitoring, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4),689-703),
Kroll,M.D.& Ford, M.L.(1992) The Illusion of knowing, error detection, and motivational orientations, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 171-378,
Kuhn,D. (2000), Mctcognitive Development, Current Direction in Psychological Science, 9(5), 178-181.
Livingstone, J. A. (2003). Metacognition: An overview. ERIC Resource Center. ED 474 273.
Moss, E. & Strayer.F. (1990) Intreactive Problem Solving of Mothers and Gifted and Nongifted Preschoolers, International Journal of Behavioral Development, 13, 177-197.
Neitzel, C.& Dopkins Stright, A.(2004) Parenting Behaviours During Child Problem-Solving: The Roles of Chiid Temparement, Mother Education and Personality, and Problem -Solving Context, International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(2), 166-179.
Pİntrich,P.R.&
D
e Groot,E.V.(1990) Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology', 82(l),33-40.
56
SEMA KARAKELLE, CENK ŞENTÜRK
Salonen,
P.
, Vaııras, P. & Efklides, A.(2005) Social Interaction-What Can It Tell Us about Metacognition and Deregulation in Learning?, European Psychologist, 10(3), 199¬208.
Santrock, J.W. (1999). Life-Span Development, 7th Edition, Mc-Graw Hill Company.
Schneider, W. & Lockl, K. (2002) The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents. Bulunduğu eser: T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.) Applied Metacognition, Cambridge University Press.
Veenmann, M.V.J, Van Hout-Wotters,B.& Afflerbach, P.(2006), Metacognition and Learning: conceptual and methodolgical considerations, Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3-14.
Veenman, M.V.J&Spaans, M.A.(2005), Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences, Learning and Individual Differences, 15(2), 159-176.
Woolfolk, A. (2004). Educational Psyhcology, 9th. Edition, Allyn and Bacon.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com