Buradasınız

IKIZ AÇIKLAR OLGUSU: FREKANS ALANINDA NEDENSELLIK YAKLASIMI

Twin Deficits Phenomenon: Causality in Frequency Domain Approach

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper examines the twin defic its hypothesis for U.S.A., Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Korea, the Philippines, Thailand and Turkey. In addition to Granger-causality tests in the time domain, this study employs causality tests in the frequency domain and spectral variance decomposition. The results from causality tests in the frequency domain can be summarized as follows : (i) there exists a significant causal relationship from budget deficits to current account defic its in the long run for Thailand and Brazil. (ii) The same causality relationship is found to be ins ignificant at all frequenc ies for Mexico, the Philippines and Turkey. (iii) The relationship is significant at high frequenc ies (short run) for Korea, Argentina and U.S.A. (iv) The causality from current account defic its to fiscal defic its is found to be significant in the This paper examines the twin defic its hypothesis for U.S.A., Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Korea, the Philippines, Thailand and Turkey. In addition to Granger-causality tests in the time domain, this study employs causality tests in the frequency domain and spectral variance decomposition. The results from causality tests in the frequency domain can be summarized as follows : (i) there exists a significant causal relationship from budget deficits to current account defic its in the long run for Thailand and Brazil. (ii) The same causality relationship is found to be ins ignificant at all frequenc ies for Mexico, the Philippines and Turkey. (iii) The relationship is significant at high frequenc ies (short run) for Korea, Argentina and U.S.A. (iv) The causality from current account defic its to fiscal defic its is found to be significant in the This paper examines the twin defic its hypothesis for U.S.A., Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Korea, the Philippines, Thailand and Turkey. In addition to Granger-causality tests in the time domain, this study employs causality tests in the frequency domain and spectral variance decomposition. The results from causality tests in the frequency domain can be summarized as follows : (i) there exists a significant causal relationship from budget deficits to current account defic its in the long run for Thailand and Brazil. (ii) The same causality relationship is found to be ins ignificant at all frequenc ies for Mexico, the Philippines and Turkey. (iii) The relationship is significant at high frequenc ies (short run) for Korea, Argentina and U.S.A. (iv) The causality from current account defic its to fiscal defic its is found to be significant in the long run for Argentina and Turkey. Albeit weak, similar causality relationship is found for U.S.A. (v) And finally, for Korea, Mexico, the Philippines, Brazil and Thailand, the causality from foreign defic its to budget defic its is found to be significant only in the short run (at high frequenc ies ).
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalismada ikiz açiklar hipotezi A.B.D., Arjantin, Brezilya, Meksika, G. Kore, Filipinler, Tayland ve Türkiye ekonomileri iç in incelenmektedir. Çalismada zaman alanindaki Granger nedensellik testlerinin yani sira frekans alaninda nedensellik testleri ve spektral varyans ayristirma teknikleri kullanilmistir. Çalismada spektral nedensellik testleri ile vari lan sonuçlar söyle özetlenebilir: (i) Tayland ve Brezilya’da uzun dönemde bütçe açiklarindan dis açiklara dogru güçlü ve anlamli bir iliski bulunmustur. (ii) Meks ika, Filipinler ve Türkiye’de ise her frekans düzeyinde iliski anlamsizdir. (iii) Kore, Arjantin ve A.B.D.’de ise kisa dönemlerde anlamli bir iliski bulunmustur. (iv) Türkiye ve Arjantin’de uzun dönemde dis açiklardan bütçe açiklarina dogru anlamli bir nedensellik iliskisi vardir. A.B.D. iç in zayif ancak ayni yönde iliski bulunmustur. (v) Son olarak, Kore, Meks ika, Filipinler, Brezilya ve Tayland’da dis açiklardan bütçe açiklarina dogru iliski daha çok mevs imsel/kisa dönemlerde (yüksek frekanslarda) anlamli bulunmustur.
87-111

REFERENCES

References: 

Anoruo, E., and S. Ramchander, (1998), “Current Account and Fiscal Deficits:
Evidence from Five Developing Economies of Asia,” ,
9(3), 487-501.
Beveridge, S. and C.R. Nelson (1981), “A New Approach to the Decomposition
of Economic Time Series into Permanent and Transitory Components with
Particular Attention to Measurement of the Business Cycle,”
, 7, 151-174.
Breitung, J., and B. Candelon, (2006), “Testing for Short and Long-run
Causality: A Frequency Domain Approach," , 132, 363-
378.
Bussiere, M., M. Fratzscher, and G. Muller, (2005), “Productivity Shocks,
Budget Deficits and the Current Account,” Manuscript, European Central Bank.
Cavallo, M. (2005a), “Government Consumption Expenditure and Current
Account,” FRBSF working Paper, 2005-3b,
(http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/papers/2005/wp0503bk.pdf).
Cavallo, M. (2005b), “Understanding the Twin Deficits: New Approaches New
Results,” , 16, 1-3.
Corsetti, G., and G. Muller (2005), “Twin Deficits: Squaring Theory, Evidence
and Common Sense,” (http://www.iue.it/Personal/corsetti/research/tdh.pdf).
Dewald, W., and M. Ulan (1990), “The Twin-Deficit Illusion," ,
9(3), 689-707.
Dibooglu, S. (1997), “Accounting for US Current Account Deficits: an
Empirical Investigation,” , 29, 787-793.
Erceg, J., C. Guierrieri, and L. Gust (2005), “Expansionary Fiscal Shocks and
the Trade Deficit,” International Finance Discussion Paper 825, FRB,
(http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2005/825/ifdp825pdf).
Geweke, J. (1986), “The Superneutrality of Money in the United States: an
Interpretation
of the Evidence,” , 54, 1-21.
Hatemi-J, A., and G. Shukur (2002), “Multivariate Causality Tests of Twin
Deficits in the US,” , 29(6), 817-824.
IMF (2004), “GEM: A New International Macroeconomic Model,” .
Kaufman, S., J. Scharler, and G. Winckler (2002), “The Austrian Current
Account Deficit: Driven by Twin Deficits or by Intertemporal Expenditure
Allocation?,” , 27, 529-542.
Kim, S., and N. Roubini (2004), “Twin Deficit or Twin Divergence,” Mimeo,
Korea University and NewYork University,
(http://econ.korea.ac.kr/prof/sykim/¯les/¯scalus9.pdf).
Kouassi, E., M. Mougaue, and K. Kyman (2004), “Causality Tests of the
Relationship Between the Twin Deficits,” , 29, 503-525.
Leachman, L., and B. Francis (2002), “Twin Deficits: Apparition or Reality?,”
, 34, 1121-1132.
KAYNAKLAR
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
Journal of Asian Economics
Journal of Monetary
Economics
Journal of Econometrics
FRBSF Economic Letter
Cato Journal
Applied Economics
Econometrica
Journal of Applied Statistics
Empirical Economics
Empirical Economics
Applied Economics
111
Miller, S., and F. Russek (1989), “Are the Twin Deficits Really Related?,”
, 7(4), 91-115.
Niskanen, W. (1988), “The Uneasy Relation Between the Budget and Trade
Deficits,” , 8(2), 507-532.
Normandin, M. (1999), “Budget Deficit Persistence and the Twin Deficits
Hypothesis,” , 49, 171-193.
Obstfeld, M. and K.S. Rogoff (1995), “Exchange Rates Dynamics Redux”,
, 103, June, 634-660
Piersanti, G. (2000), “Current Account Dynamics and Expected Future Budget
Deficits,” , 19, 255-271.
Taylor, J. (2004), “The US Current Account: Recent Trends and Policies,” US
Treasury Office of Public Affairs, JS 2084.
Vamvoukas, G. A. (1999), “The Twin Deficits Phenomenon: Evidence from
Greece,” , 31, 1093-1100.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com