Buradasınız

TELEVİZYONUN EN ÇOK İZLENEN MEDYA OLMASINDAKİ TEMEL ETKEN: POPÜLER KÜLTÜR

MAIN FACTOR ON MUCH WATCHING MEDIA TELEVISION: POPULAR CULTURE

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS2605

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Popular culture is the most common life style in 21.st century and numerous people live with products and approaches of popular culture. Great changes eventuated after Industrial Revolution in the world and life styles and cultures changed and people met recent products and approaches. People who lived in rural areas in traditional culture migrated urban areas and they began tol ive in a different culture. Impacts of traditional culture descreased since the migration from rural areas to urban areas after industrialization and modern culture had a sovereignity on urban areas. People work much in urban areas which are equipped with contemporary facilities less than rural areas but have more problems and want to have more peace and want to have fun. Television became one of main components in high rhythm modern urban culture. Television is the most popular media and it makes common topics and causes cultural sharing and also cleans differences and prevents developments of varieties. Television causes spreading of consuming habit and makes traditional cultural values insufficiency and causes modern trends standing. Popular culture is main life style of urban areas and feeds urban life with simple and easy components and conveys urban people entertaining messages. People who consume and believe they are happy by consuming having fun are also fed by television. Television is watched by the people who live in high rhythm life in modern conditions to escape from daily problems and to have fun almost everyday and television acts as main actor of popular culture. Popular culture generates with easy understand and easy repead products and approaches is main rawmaterial of television and is conveyed all the world via television. The people who live in popular culture permanently watch television to survive.
Abstract (Original Language): 
21. yüzyılda popüler kültür den yaygın yaşam biçemi olarak var olmakta ve sayısız insan popüler kültürün ürünleri ve yaklaşımlarıyla yaşamaktadır. Sanayi Devrimi’nin ardından tüm dünyada büyük değişimler yaşanmış, yaşam biçemleri ve kültürler dönüşmüş, insanlar yeni ürünler ve yaklaşımlarla tanışmışlardır. Kırsal alanlarda geleneksel kültürle yaşayan insanlar kentsel alanlara göçmüş, burada farklı bir kültürle yaşamaya başlamışlardır. Kırsal alanlardan kentsel alanlara göçle birlikte geleneksel kültürün etkileri azalmış, modern kültür kentsel alanlarda egemen olmuştur. Çağdaş olanaklarla donanmış kent yaşamı içinde insanlar kırsal alanda olduğundan daha az çalışmakta, ancak daha çok problem yaşamakta ve daha çok rahatlamak ve eğlenmek istemektedir. Modern kent kültürünün yüksek ritimli yaşamı içinde televizyon, başlıca unsurlardan biri haline gelmiştir. En çok izlenen medya olarak televizyon, küresel bağlamda ortak alanlar oluşturup kültür paylaşımlarına neden olurken, farklılıkları ortadan kaldırarak çeşitliliğin gelişmesine engel olmaktadır. Televizyon yoğun biçimde tüketim alışkanlığını yaygınlaştırmakta, geleneksel kültürel değerlerin geçerliliğini azaltarak modern eğilimlerin yerleşmesine neden olmaktadır. Kentsel alanların temel yaşam biçemi olan popüler kültür, basit ve kolay yapısıyla kent yaşamını beslemekte, kent halkına eğlenceli iletiler aktarmaktadır. Popüler kültür içinde tüketerek ve eğlenerek mutlu olduklarına inanan insanlar da televizyondan beslenmekte, popüler kültürün yaklaşımlarını televizyon aracılığıyla izlemektedirler. Modern koşullarda yüksek yaşam ritmi içinde yaşayan insanların günlük gerilimlerden uzaklaşmak ve eğlenmek için hemen her gün izledikleri televizyon, popüler kültürün temel aktörü olarak rol oynamaktadır. Kolay anlaşılabilen tekrarlanabilen ürün ve yaklaşımlardan oluşan popüler kültür, televizyonun ana hammaddesini oluşturmakta ve tüm dünyaya televizyon aracılığıyla aktarılmaktadır. Popüler kültürle yaşayan insanlar da yaşamlarını sürdürmek için sürekli televizyon izlemektedir.
27
44

REFERENCES

References: 

ADAMS, Paul C. (1992). Television as gathering place. Annals of American Geographers, 82 (1), 117-135.
40
Sedat CERECİ
AGGER, B. (1991). Critical theory, poststructuralism, postmodernism: Their sociological relevance. Annual Review of Sociology, 17,105-131.
AİMAN-SMITH, L. ve GREEN, S. G. (2002). Implementing new manufacturing technology: The related effects of technology characteristics and user learning activities. The Academy of Management Journal, 45 (2), 421-430.
AQUINAS, T. (2007). Varlık ve Öz. Çev: Oğuz Özügül. İstanbul: Say.
ASHBY, L. (2010). The rising of popular culture: A historiographical sketch. OAH Magazine of History, 24 (2), 11-14.
ASHLEY, R.ve Blanksby, J. ve Cashman, A. ve Jack, L. ve Wright, G. ve Packman, J. ve Fewtrell, L. ve Poole, T. ve Maksimovic, C. (2007). Adaptable urban drainage: Addressing change in intensity, occurence and uncertainty of stormwater (audacıous). Built Environment, 33 (1), 70-84.
BARNETT, L. A. ve ALLEN, M. P. (2000). Social class, cultural repertoires, and popular culture: The case of film. Sociological Forum, 15 (1), 145-163.
BEQUETTE, J. W. (2009). Tapping a postcolonial community's cultural capital: Empowering native artists to engage more fully with traditional culture and their children's art education. Visual Arts Research, 35 (1), 76-90.
BERNSTEİN, E. (2010). Militarized humanitarianism meets carceral feminism: The politics of sex, rights, and freedom in contemporary antitrafficking campaigns. Signs, 36 (1), Feminists Theorize International Political Economy Special Issue Editors Shirin M. Rai and Kate Bedford, 45-71.
BÖLGE GAZETESİ (2009). “En Çok İzlenen Medya”. 13.03.2009. S. 4.
BRANDT, S. L. (2009). The city as liminal space: Urban visuality and aesthetic experience in postmodern U. S. literature and cinema. American Studies, 54 (4), 553-581.
CADMAN, D. (1980). Assesing the impacts of the private property sector’s role in development. Built Environment, 47, 114-119.
CERECİ, S. (1996). Televizyonun Sosoyolojik Boyutu. İstanbul: Şule.
CERECİ, S. (2001). Televizyonda Program Yapımı. İstanbul: Metropol Yayınları.
CERECİ, S. (2008). Mağaradan Ekrana Görüntünün Öyküsü. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
CERECİ, S. (2012). Medya Yapımları ve Yapım Teknikleri. Ankara: Nobel.
CERECİ, S. (2013). Film Yapımı. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
CLARKE, G. ve CALLAGHAN, V. (2007). Ubiquitous computing, informatization, urban structures and density. Built Environment, 33 (2), 196-212.
CHERNILO, D. (2002). The theorization of social co-ordinations in differentiated societies: The theory of generalized symbolic media in Parsons, Luhmann and Habermas. The British Journal of Sociology, 53 (3), 431-449.
CHEUNG, C. ve LEUNG, K. (2010). Ways that social change predicts personal quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 96 (3), 459-477.
COONNOR, M. A. (2012). Holding the center: Images of urbanity on television in Los Angeles, 1950-1970. Sorthern California Quarterly, 94 (2): 230-255.
Televizyonun En Çok İzlenen Medya Olmasındaki Temel Etken: Popüler Kültür 41
DARLEY, G. (1978). Rural settlement-rural Resettlement: The future. Built Environment, 4 (4), 299-310.
DAS, V. (1984). Oral language in rural education. India International Centre Quarterly, 11 (2), 199-205.
DAVAN, D. (2009). Sharing and showing: Television as monstration. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625: 19-31.
DAVOUDI, S. ve STEAD, D. (2002). Urban-rural relaitonship: An introduction and brief history. Built Environment, 28 (4), 268-277.
DOW, S. C. ve GHOSH, D. ve RUZİEV, K. (2008). A stages approach to banking development in transition economies, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 31 (1), 3-33.
ELLUL, J. (1998). Sözün Düşüşü. Çev: Hüsamettin Arslan. İstanbul: Paradigma.
ESCHEN, M. V. (2006). Globalizing popular culture in the “American Century” and beyond. OAH Magazine of History, 20 (4), 56-63.
FİSCHER, C. S. (1975). Toward a subcultural theory of urbanism. American Journal of Sociology, 80 (6), 1319-1341.
FOL, S. (2012). Urban shrinkage and socio-spatial disparities: Are the remedies worse than the disease?. Built Environment (1978-), 38 (2), 259-275.
FROSH, P. (2009). Tha face of television, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625, 87-102.
GRUNER, S. (1968). The revolution of July 1830 and the expression bourgeoisie. The Historical Journal, 11 (3), 462-471.
GUNNING, T. (2008). Early cinema and the variety of moving images. American Art, 22 (2), 9-11.
HALL, D. (2005). Listomania: The list as popular culture icon. Studies in Popular Culture, 28 (1), 49-59.
HARTLEY, J. (2005). “Daytime TV”. The Television Genre Book. Ed. Glen Creeber. P. 92-94. London: British Flm Institute.
HASELSTEIN, U. ve Ostendorf, B. ve Schneck, P. (2001). Popular culture: Introduction. Amerikastudien / American Studies, 46 (3), 331-338.
HILMES, M. (1994). Born yesterday: Television and the academic Mind. American Literary History, 6 (4), 792-802.
JOHNSON, R. L. (2001). “Dancing mothers” the Chautauqua movement in twentieth-century American popular culture. American Studies International, 29 (2): 53-70.
JOHNSON, D. M. (2011). From the Tomahawk chop to the road block: Discourses of savagism in Whitestream media. American Indian Quarterly, 35 (1), 104-134.
JOHNSTON, J. ve Laxer, G. (2003). Solidarity in the age of globalization: Lessons from the anti-Mai and Zapatista itruggles. Theory And Society. 32 (1), 39-91.
42
Sedat CERECİ
KARIMOVA, G. (2010). Interpretive methodology from literary criticism: Carnivalesque analysis of popular culture: "Jackass, south park", and 'everyday' culture. Studies in Popular Culture, 33 (1), 37-51.
KEITH, P. M. ve Goudy, W. J. ve Powers, E. (1979). Marital status, family, activity and attitudes toward life and death, International Journal of Sociology and the Family, 9 (1), 95-109.
KOVEN, M. J. (2003). Folklore studies and popular film and television: A necessary critical survey. The Journal of American Folklore, 116 (460), 176-195.
LABA, M. (1979). Urban folklore: A behavioral approach. Western Folklore, 38 (3): 158-169.
LENZ, G. S. ve LAWSON, C. (2011). Looking the part: Television leads less informed citizens to vote based on candidates' appearance. American Journal of Political Science, 55 (3), 574-589.
LEVIEN, R. (2004). Mystery and imagination. RSA Journal, 151 (5514), 46-49.
LEWITT, P. ve JAWORSKY, B. N. (2007). Transnational migration studies: Past developments and future trends, Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 129-256.
LOTFI, S. ve KOOSHARI, M. J. (2009). Analyzing accesibility dimension of urban quality of life: Where urban designers face duality between subjective and objective reading of place. Social Indicator Research, 94 (3), 417-435.
MCALLISTER, C. ve LEWIS, J. ve MURPHY, S. (2012). The green Grass grew all Around: Rethinking urban natural spaces with children in mind. Children, Youth and Environments, 22 (2), 164-193.
MCCARTY, A. (1995). The front row is reserved for Scotch drinkers: Early television’s tavern audience. Cinema Journal, 34 (4): 31-49.
MCNEILL, W. H. ve MCGEE, T. G. ve ZOLBERG, A. ve STOLNITZ, G. J. (1976). Human migration: Patterns, implications, policies. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 30 (2), 14-25.
MARCUSE, P. (2006). Tradition in a global city. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 17 (2), 7-18.
MARLING, W. (2000). Globalism: Imaginary and real. American Studies, 42 (2/3), 321-332.
MATTELART, A. (2003). İletişim Kuramları Tarihi. Çev: Merih Zıllıoğlu. İstanbul: İletişim.
MAYER, V. (2008). "Guys gone wild"? Soft-core video professionalism and new realities in television production. Cinema Journal, 47 (2), 97-116.
MEIJL, T. (2001). Contesting traditional culture in post-colonial Maori society. on the tension between culture and identity. Paideuma, (47), 129-145.
MENEZES, M. (2003). The Artificial Natural: Manipulating butterfly wing patterns for artistic purposes. Leonardo, 36 (1), 29-32.
MILETI, D. S. ve CRESS, D. M. ve DARLINGTON, J. D. (2002). Earthquake culture can corporate action”, Sociological Forum, 17 (1), 161-180.
Televizyonun En Çok İzlenen Medya Olmasındaki Temel Etken: Popüler Kültür 43
MOKYR, J. (1977). Demand vs. supply in the industrial revolution. The Journal of Economic History, 37 (4): 981-1008.
MOUSSEAU, M. (2007). Capitalist development and civil war. International Studies Quarterly, 56 (3), 470-483.
MUNSON, M. K. (2000). Sex, gender, and status: Human images from the classic mimbres. American Antiquity, 65 (1), 127-143.
MUSTERD, S. ve GRITSAI, O. (2009). Creative and knowledge cities: Development paths and policies from a European perspective. Built Environment (1978-), 35 (2), 173-188.
NEWCOMB, Horace (1979). Appalachia on television: Region as symbol in American popular culture. Appalachian Journal, 7 (½), 155-164.
ONO, A. (2012). You gotta throw away culture once you become Christian: How 'culture' is redefined among Aboriginal pentecostal Christians in rural new South Wales. Oceania, 82 (1), 74-85.
OUDSHOORN, N. ve ROMMES, E. ve STIENSTRA, M. (2004). “Configuring the user as everybody: Gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Science, Technology & Human Values, 29 (1): 30-63.
REAL, M. R. (1980). Media theory: Contributions to an understanding of American mass communication. American Quarterly, 32 (3), 238-258.
ROBERTS, B. R. (1989). Urbanization, and development. Sociological Forum, 4 (4): 665-691.
RYE, J. F. (2005). Leaving the countryside: An unalysis of rural-to-urban migration and long-term capital uccumulation. Acta Sociologica, 59 (1), 47-65.
SCHOCKET, M. (2011). Little founders on the small screen: Interpreting a multicultural American revolution for children’s television. Journal of American Studies, 45 (1): 145-163.
SCHULL, N. D. (2005). Digital gambling: The coincidence of desire and design. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597, 65-81.
SIRGY, M. J. ve GUREL-ATAY, E.ve WEBB, D. ve CICIC, M. ve MURIS, H. ve EKİCİ, A. ve HERRMANN, A. ve HEGAZY, I. ve LEE, D. J. ve JOHAR, J. S. (2012) Linking advertising, materialism, and life Satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 107 (1), 79-101.
SLOAN, G. (1979). The subversive effects of an oral culture on student writing. College Composition and Communication, 30 (2), 156-160.
SPICKARD, J. V. (2004). Globalization and religious organizations: Rethinking the relationship between church, culture, and market. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 18 (1/2), 47-63. ,
SQRUE, T. J. (2004). Affirmative action from below: Civil rights, the building trades, and the politics of racial equality in the urban northa, 1945-1969. The Journal of American History, 91 (1), 145-173.
44
Sedat CERECİ
STEENSMA, H. K. ve MARINO, L. ve WEAVER, K. M. ve DICKSON, P. H. (2000). The influence of national culture on the formation of technology alliances by entrepreneurial firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5), 951-973.
TORRES, E. (1991). Traditional culture, new agriculture. Race, Poverty & the Environment, 1 (4), 13.
WEIGERT, A. J. (2008). Pragmatic Thinking about Self, Society, and Natural Environment: Mead, Carson, and Beyond. Symbolic Interaction, 31 (3), 235-258.
WHITING, C. (2009). “It’s Only a Paper Moon”: The cyborg eye of Vija Celmins. American Art, 23 (1), 36-55.
WUTHNOW, R. ve WITTEN, M. (1988). New directions in the study of culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 65.
YANG, J. (2013). Social exclusion and young rural-urban migrants' integration into a host society in China. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 648, Youth Migration and Transitions to Adulthood in Developing Countries, 52-69.
ZHONGYUN, Z. (1987). The relationship of Chinese Traditional culture to the modernization of China: An introduction to the current discussion. Asian Survey, 27 (4), 442-458.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com