Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

SINIF ÖĞRETMENI ADAYLARININ İYI ÖĞRETMEN OLMA İLE İLGILI GÖRÜŞLERI

PRIMARY TEACHERS CANDIDATES’ VIEWS ON GOOD TEACHER

Journal Name:

  • Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study was to examine qualitatively 109 third year primary teacher candidates’ views on being a good teacher. One open-ended question was posed to teacher candidates to be answered in writing. Although opinions about being a good teacher were categorized into six subtitles: personal characteristics, knowledge of subject and its teaching;, skills, professional growth, appreciation, and commitment to the mission, most of the answers were about different dimensions of personal characteristics.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma, sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının iyi öğretmen olma ile ilgili görüşlerini araştıran nitel bir çalışmadır. Gazi Üniversitesinde ikinci öğretimde okumakta olan 109 3.sınıf öğretmen adayına açık uçlu bir soru yanıtlanmak üzere verilmiştir. İyi öğretmen olma ile ilgili görüşler kişisel karakteristikler, konu ve konu anlatımına hakimlik, beceriler, profesyonel gelişim, takdir edilme ve görev yükümlülüğü başlıkları altında toplanmış olmasına rağmen verilen yanıtların çoğunluğu kişisel karakteristiklerin farklı boyutları altında toplanmıştır
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon uvt_108425.pdf
  • 1
53-61
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Akyüz, Y. (1978). Türkiye deki öğretmenlerin toplumsal değişmedeki etkileri. Ankara: Doğan
Basımevi.
Berliner, D. (1987a). Simple views of effective teaching and a simple theory of classroom
instruction. D. C. Berliner ve B. V. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to Teacher. New York:
Random House.
Berliner, D. C. (1987b). But do they understand? Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), Educator’s
handbook: A research perspective. New York: Longman
Brophy, J.E., & Alleman, J. (1991). Activities as instructional tools: A framework for analysis
and evaluation. Educational Researcher, 20(4), 9-23.
Cobb , P., & McClain, K. (1999). Supporting teachers’ learning in social and institutional
contexts. In Fou-Lai Lin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on
Mathematics Teacher Education (7-77). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University
Cruickshank, D., Bainer D., & Metcalf. K. (1995). The act of teaching. Mcgraw-Hill, Inc.
Cruickshank, D.R., & Heafele, D. (2001). Good teachers, plural. Educational Leadership, 58(2),
26-30.
Ekiz, D. (2003). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının öğretmen eğitimindeki modeller hakkında
düşünceleri. Milli Eğitim, 158, 146-160.
Evertson, C., Andarson, L., & Brophy, J. (1978). Texas junior high school study: final report of
process outcome relationship (Vol.1. Report No. 4061). Research and Development
Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas.
Göksugüzel, L. (2000). Öğretmen yetiştirmede sosyal beceri eğitiminde rehberlik. II. Ulusal
Öğretmen Yetiştirme Sempozyumu (581-583), Çanakkale.
Hamachek, D. (1995). Psychology in teaching, learning and growth. Mass: Allyn and Bacon.
Hidget, G. (1957). The art of teaching. New York: Vintage Books
Kane, P. R., & Temple, E. (1997). Who is a good teacher? who is a good school head?
Independent School, 56(3), 50-57.
Kavcar, C. (1999). Nitelikli öğretmen sorunu. Eğitimde yansımalar V. 21. Yüzyılın Eşiğinde
Eğitim Sistemi Ulusal Sempozyumu. Ankara.
Kızıltepe, Z. (2002). İyi ve etkili öğretmen. Eğitim ve Bilim, 27, 10-14.
McDonald, F. (1975). Research on teaching and its implications for policy making: Report on
phase II of the beginning teachers evaluation study. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing
Service.
SINIF ÖĞRETMENI ADAYLARININ İYI ÖĞRETMEN OLMA 61
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Eğitim Genel Müdürlüğü. (2006). Öğretmenlik
mesleği genel yeterlilikleri. Temel Eğitime Destek Projesi “Öğretmen Eğitimi Bileşeni”.
Murray, H. G. (1983). Low inference classroom teaching behavior and student ratings of college
teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 138-149.
Porter, A.C., & Brophy, J.E. (1987). Good teaching: Insights from work of the Institute for
Research on Teaching. Occasional PAPER No.114, East Lansing: The Institute for
Research on Teaching, Collage of Education, Michigan State University.
Rosenshine, B., & Furst, N. (1973). The use of direct observation to study teaching. In R.
Travers (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand Mcnally.
Ryans, D.G. (1960). Characteristics of effective teachers, their descriptions, comparisons and
appraisal: A research study. Washington DC: American Council on Education.
Sherman, B.R., & Blaackman, R.T. (1975). Personal characteristics and teaching effectiveness
of college faculty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 124-131
Sanders, S. E. (2002). What do schools think makes a good mathematics teacher? Educational
Studies, 28(2), 181-191.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harward
Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Soar, R. S., & Soar, R. M. (1978). Setting variables, classroom interaction, and multiple
outcomes. Final Report for National Institute of Education, Project No.6-0432.
Gainesville, University of Florida.
Stallings, J., & Hentzell, S. (1978). Effective teaching and learning in urban schools. Paper
presented at the National Conference on Urban Schools, St. Louis, Missouri.
Sullivan, P., & McDonough, A. (2002). Teachers differ in their effectiveness. Proceedings of
the 26th Annual Conference on Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol.4, s.249-255).
Yetim, A. A., & Göktaş, Z. (2000). Öğretmenin mesleki ve kişisel nitelikleri. II. Ulusal
Öğretmen Yetiştirme Sempozyumu (569-573), Çanakkale.
Woolfolf, A.E. (1990). Educational psychology. (4th ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,
(622 pp.), Allyn and Bacon.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com