Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

SUÇ TEORİLERİ VE ŞEHİR GÜVENLİĞİ: BİTLİS İLİYLE İLGİLİ GENEL BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Crime Theories and City Safety: A General Evaluation of the City of Bitlis

Journal Name:

  • Polis Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
It is not possible to prevent crimes only with traditional policing measures. Everyone has duties and responsibilities in the prevention of crime. The measures taken to prevent crimes must increase the risk for potential criminals and discourage them. In terms of prevention of crimes, it is important to thwart individuals and goods to be appropriate targets for criminals, and implement spatial, physical and environmental crime prevention strategies for this purpose. As well as some crime theories such as broken windows theory, rational choice theory, routine activities theory and situational crime prevention theory that discuss these issues, there are also some models and programs such as community policing, problem oriented policing, COMPSTAT and CPTED that were generated utilizing abovementioned theories and implemented in various countries including the USA and England. In this study, in the light of abovementioned crime theories and various programs and models implemented for the purpose of crime prevention, and also based on the authors’ own observations, experiences and evaluations, it is aimed to point out various factors inducing security related problems in the province of Bitlis and bring possible solutions to them.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Suçların sadece geleneksel polisiye tedbirlerle önlenmesi mümkün değildir. Suçun önlenmesinde herkese düşen bir görev ve sorumluluk bulunmaktadır. Suçu önlemek amacıyla alınacak olan tedbirlerin potansiyel suçlular açısından riskleri artırıcı ve cesaretlerini kırıcı olması gerekmektedir. Suçluların hedefi olan şahıs ya da malların uygun bir hedef olmaktan çıkarılması ve bu amaçla mekânsal, fiziksel ve çevresel suç önleme stratejilerinin uygulanması suçların önlenmesi açısından önem arz etmektedir. Konuyu kuramsal olarak tartışan kırık camlar teorisi, rasyonel tercih teorisi, rutin aktiviteler teorisi ve durumsal suç önleme teorisi gibi suç teorileri ile birlikte, bu teorilerden yararlanılarak geliştirilen ve başta ABD ve İngiltere olmak üzere değişik ülkelerde uygulanan toplum destekli polislik, problem odaklı polislik, COMPSTAT, CPTED gibi değişik model ve programlar bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, bahse konu suç teorileri ve suç önlemeye yönelik uygulanan değişik programlar ve modeller ışığında, yazarların kendi gözlem, tecrübe ve değerlendirmelerine dayanılarak, Bitlis ilinde güvenlik sorunu oluşturan faktörlerin belirlenmesi ve bunlara yönelik çözüm önerilerinin getirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-suc-teorileri-sehir-guvenligi-bitlis-iliyle-ilgili-genel-bir-degerlendirme.pdf
  • 4
27-53
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Afacan, Mehmet, (2007), “Local Policing: Using Community Policing
Principles as a Tactic in the Time of Terror”, Hüseyin Durmaz, Bilal
Sevinc, Ahmet Said Yayla & Sıddık Ekici (Eds.), Understanding and
Responding to Terrorism, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp.252-259.
Akers, Ronald L., (2000), Criminological Theories: Introduction,
Evaluation, and Application, Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing
Company.
Alderson, John, (1979), Community Policing, Devon and Cornwall
Constabulary: Public Relations Department.
Braga, Anthony A., (2002), Problem Oriented Policing and Crime
Prevention, Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Presss.
Bullock, Karen; Erol, Rosie and Tilley, Nick, (2006), Problem Oriented
Policing and Partnership: Implementation of an Evidence Based
Approach to Crime Reduction, Cullompton: Willian.
Clarke, Ronald V., (1997), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful
Case Studies, Guilderland, NY: Harrow and Heston Publishers.
Clark, Ronald V., (1995), “Situational Crime Prevention”, Crime and
Justice, 19, pp.91-150.
Clarke, Ronald V. & Newman, Graeme R., (2007), “Situational Crime
Prevention and the Control of Terrorism”, Ozgur Nikbay & Suleyman
Hancerli (Eds.), Understanding and Responding to Terrorism
Phenomenon: A Multi-Dimensional Perspective, Amsterdam: IOS
Press, pp. 285-297.
Cohen, Lawrence and Felson, Marcus, (1979), “Social Change and Crime
Rate Trends: A Routine Activities Approach”, American Sociological
Review, 44, pp.588-608.
Crowe, Timothy D., (2000), Crime Prevention Through Environmental
Design: Applications of Architectural Design and Space Management
Concepts, Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann Publications.
Cullen, Francis T. & Agnew, Robert, (1999), Criminological Theory:
Past to Present, Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company.
Dolu, Osman, (2009), “Bir Fırsat Olarak Suç: Suçun Durumsal Belirleyicileri,
Suç Fırsatları ve Rutin Faaliyetler Teorisi”, Polis Bilimleri Dergisi,
C.11, N.2, ss.1-29.
Dugan, L., LaFree, G. & Piquero, A. R., (2005), “Testing a Rational
Choice Model of Airline Hijackings”, Criminology, 43, 4; pp.1031-
1065.
Felson, Marcus & Clarke, Ronald V., (1987), Opportunity Makes the
Thief: Practical Theory for Crime Prevention, London, UK: Research,
Development and Statistics Directorate, UK Home Office.
Geleri, Aytekin, (2010), “Şehirlerde Suç Önleme Politikalarının Geliştirilmesi”,
Polis Bilimleri Dergisi, 12, 3, ss.23-39.
Goldstein, Herman, (1990), Problem Oriented Policing, Phladelphis:
Temple University Press.
Gulak, Morton; Kun, Ulvi; Koday, Zeki & Koday, Saliha, (2007),
“Preventing Terrorist Attacks to Critical Infrastructure(s) by Use of
Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED)”, Ozgur
Nikbay & Suleyman Hancerli (Eds.), Understanding and Responding
to Terrorism Phenomenon: A Multi-Dimensional Perspective, Amsterdam:
IOS Press, pp.298-312.
Gül, Serdar Kenan, (2009), “An Evaluation of the Rational Choice
Theory in Criminology”, Girne American University Journal of Social
and Applied Science, Vol.4, No.8, pp.36-44, http://www.gau.edu.tr
/PDF-Files/JSAS_004_08/JSAS_004_08_2_Gul.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi
02.03.2011).
Gül, Serdar Kenan, (2011), “Polis Yönetimi ve Toplum Destekli Polislik”,
Suçla Mücadelede Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar, (Ed. M. Karakaya ve S.
Gültekin), Polis Akademisi Yayınları, Ankara.
Jang, Hyunseok, (2008), Evalution of Compstat Policing Strategy Using
Broken Windows Enforcement in Two Texas Police Departments: A
Time Series Analysis, Unpublished Dissertation, Sam Houston State
University.
Kırkpınar, Ahmet Rahmi, (2008), “Durumsal Suç Önleme Nedir ve Suç
ile Mücadelede Etkili midir?”, Oğuzhan Ömer Demir (Ed.), ISREF
Perspektif: Problem Odaklı Polislik, Glen Allen, VA: İnceleme ve Stratejik
Araştırmalar Forumu, ss.12-14.
Suç Teorileri ve Şehir Güvenliği: Bitlis İliyle İlgili Genel Bir Değerlendirme 53
McGarrell, Edmund F., (2007), “Intelligence Led Policing as a
Framework for Law Enforcement in the 21st Century”, Hüseyin Durmaz,
Bilal Sevinc, Ahmet Said Yayla & Sıddık Ekici (Eds.),
Understanding and Responding to Terrorism, Amsterdam: IOS Press,
pp.221-235.
Nyatepe-Coo, A., (2004), “Economic Implications of Terrorism”, A.
Nyatepe-Coo & D. Zeisler-Vralsted (Eds.), Understanding Terrorism:
Threats in an Uncertain World, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson
Prentice Hall, pp.77-89.
Sevinc, Bilal, (2008), Participation in Terrorist Organizations: An Analysis
of Left Wing DHKP/C and Religiously Motivated Turkish Hezbollah
Terrorist Organizations, Unpublished Dissertation, Michigan State
University.
Wilson, James and Kelling, George L., (1982), “Broken Windows: The
Police and Neighborhood Safety”, Atlantic Monthly, pp.29-38.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com