Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

SOSYAL ESITSIZLIKLERIN GIDERILMESINDE BIR ÇÖZÜM ÖNERISI : CINSIYET ESASLI BÜTÇELEME (TEORI, GELISIM VE UYGULAMA)

SOCIAL INEGUALITY PROBLEMS AND IT'S SOLUTIONS: GENDER BASED BUDGETING

Journal Name:

  • Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Budget and budget process has a various effects on the economy and people, also budget as an important tool for a fiscal policy. Gender budgeting is a relatively new approach used to ensure mainstream financial and budgetary policy and promote gender equality. Gender budgeting is mainly about the general or mainstream budget. Nevertheless, a separate presentation and high lighting of expenditure directly affecting women in comparison to men may be a tool for awareness–raising and in the longer term restructing of the budget to better reflect the needs and interests of both women and men. The aim of gender budgeting is to transform financial and budgetary, policy in accordance with gender equality objectives. Gender Budgeting is an application of gender mainstreaming in the budgetary process. It means a gender–based assessment of budgets, incorporating a gender perspective at all levels of the budgetary process and restructing revenues and expenditures in order to promote gender equality. Gender budgeting initiatives contribute to gender mainstreaming by focusing on the gender dimensions of government budgets, both revenue and the expenditure side. This paper gives a short introduction to gender budgeting in some country example and some of the key ideas and tools of gender budgeting. This paper also includes, gender budgeting application and its tools. Another aim to this paper, given an detailed analysis about measurement of gender equality and inequality problems.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bütçe ve bütçe süreci kamusal hizmetlerin yerine getirilmesinde en önemli araçlardan biridir. Bütçe ekonomik, siyasi, hukuki ve denetim fonksiyonları ile bu görevini yerine getirmektedir. Günümüzde toplum refahının sağlanabilmesi için bütçe süreci bir takım yeniliklerle ve değisimlerle karsı karsıya kalmaktadır. Bunlar içinde en önemli olanlardan biri cinsiyet esaslı bütçeleme yaklasımıdır. Geleneksel bütçe yaklasımlarında cinsiyet konusu pek göz önüne alınmazken, cinsiyetler arasındaki esitsizlik nedeniyle dikkatler bu konudaki gelismelere odaklanmıstır. Bu süreçte, kamusal faaliyetler ana olarak kamu harcamaları ve kamu gelirleri ekseninde olustuğu için, bu iki ana baslığın cinsiyet esitliğine ve esitsizliğine ne gibi katkılar yaptığının belirlenmesi kamu politikalarının etkilerinin belirlenmesi açısından önem kazanmaktadır. Popüler ve güncel bir konu olan cinsiyet esaslı bütçe yaklasımı ile cinsiyet ve bununla ilgili konular, kamu kesimi faaliyetlerine hakim kılınmak suretiyle, kamu harcamaları, kamu gelirleri, devlet borçları, bütçe, bütçe süreci, bütçe çıktılarının değerlendirilmesi yapılmaktadır. Söz konusu bu değerlendirme cinsiyet baz alınarak yapıldığında, kamu politikalarının cinsiyet esitliği, yada esitsizliğine hizmet ettiği daha iyi anlasılabilir ve gelecekte uygulanacak politikalara daha etkili yön verilebilir.Bu çalısmanın ana amacı, giderek artan bir öneme sahip olan cinsiyet esaslı bütçe ile ilgili temel tanımlamalara, uygulama çerçevesine, ve ülke örneklerine değinmektir. Çalısma bu amacını bir adım öteye götürerek cinsiyet esitsizliklerini ölçen yöntemlere de değinmeye çalısmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-sosyal-esitsizliklerin-giderilmesinde-bir-cozum-onerisi-cinsiyet-esasli-butceleme-teori-gelisim-uygulama.pdf
  • 1
167-211
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Advisory Comittee on Equal Opprotunities for Women and Men (2003), Opinion on
Gender Budgeting, EU Parliament, Brussels.
Aktan, Coskun C. ve A. Kadir ISIK (2007), Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Devletin Rolü (Edt C. C.
Aktan) Aura Yayınları, Đstanbul.
Anand, Sudhir and Amartya Sen (1995), “Gender Inequality and Human Development
Theories and Measurement”, back ground papers for Human Development
Report New York UN HDR Office.
Axelrod, D. (1995), Budgeting for Modern Government, Second Edition New York St.
Martin’s Press Inc.
Bartle, John R. and Omaha Marilyn (2002), The Potential of Gender Budgeting: Has its
Day Come, Panel on ”Democratizing the Budgetary Process” Association for
Budgeting and Financial Management Annual Conference, October 12, Missouri,
USA.
Berksoy, Turgay ve A. Kadir ISIK (2006), Sağlık Hizmetleri Piyasası ABD örneği, (Edt
Berksoy ve Isık), SPK Yayınları, No 177, Ankara.
Budlender, Debbie (2004), Review of Gender Budget Đnititatves, CASE, Working Paper,
USA, pp. 1–78.
SOSYAL ESĐTSĐZLĐKLERĐN GĐDERĐLMESĐNDE
BĐR ÇÖZÜM ÖNERĐSĐ : CĐNSĐYET ESASLI BÜTÇELEME
209
Budlender, Debbie and Diane Elson (2000), are made in UNIFEM, Progress of the World’s
Women 2000, New York, p. 118.
Budlender, Debbie and Rhonda Sharp with Kerri Allen (1998), How to do a gender–
sensitive budget analysis: contemporary research and practice, Commonwealth
Secretariat and Australian Agency for International Development.
Budlender, Elson, Guy Hewitt L. and T. Mukhopadhyay (2002), Gender Budgets Make
Cents, Commonwealth Secretariat, London, UK.
Cagatay, N. , M. Keklik, R. Lal and J. Lang (2000) “ Budgets as if People Mattered:
Democartizing Macro Economic Policies” SEPED Conference Paper NO: 4, USA.
Chen, Shaohua and Martin Ravallion (2004), ” How Have the World’s Poorest Fared
Since Early 1980s”, Policy Research Working Paper No: 3341, World Bank,
Washington DC.
Dastot, Kean (2000) The Yellow Budget Paper on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality’,
paper presented to Conference on Gender Budgets, Financial Markets and
Financing for Development, Heinrich Boll Stiftung, Berlin.
Department of Finance (1998), Government of South Africa, Budget Review, Pretoria,
pp. 15–658.
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet and Office of Status of Women,
Commonwealth of Australia (1986–87), Women’s Budget Program: An Assessment of
the Impact on Women of the 1986–87 Budget, p. 180.
Eikenberry, A. M. (2001), “Alternative Models of Public Budgeting: Speculations on an
Feminist Budgeting Process” , unpublished paper, School of Public
Administration, University of Nebraska at Omaha, USA.
Elson, Diane (2003), Gender Equality and Europe’s Future, European Commission, DG
Education and Culture and Jean Monnet Project Brussels, 4. March.
Elson, Diane (1998), ‘Integrating Gender Issues into National Budgetary Policies and
Procedures: Some Policy Options’ Journal of International Development , Vol 10,
pp. 929–941.
European Research Office and APRODEV (2002), Concepts Notes on Gender Budgeting,
UNIFEM and OECD, Conference of Belgium Government, Brussels.
Fitzgerald, R. (1999), Toolkit for Mainstreaming Equal Opportunities for Women and Men into
the Structural Fund Programmes in Scotland, Prepared for Scottish Executive and
Equal Opportunities Commission.
Government of France, Draft (2001) Budget Act: Review of Appropriations for Actions in
Support of Women’s Rights, p. 13. (Translated by OECD for 22nd Annual Meeting
of Senior Budget Officials, May 2001, PUMA/SBO.
Abdülkadir ISIK – Hayriye ISIK
210
Hendricks, J. J. (1995), “A response to manichean feminism”, Adminsitration and
Society, Volume 27, pp. 290–295.
Hunt, Karen and Debbie Budlender (Etd) (1998) Money Matters– Women and the
Government Budget, Idasa, Capetown.
Isık, A. Kadir (2005), Hayatın Kalitesi Kavramının Felsefik Temelleri, Aristo, Bentham ve
Nordenfelt, T. C. Sağlık Bakanlığı, Ankara.
www. sabem. gov. tr/akademikmetinler
Klasen, Stephan (1994), “Missing Women, Reconsidered” World Development, Volume
22, No: 7, pp. 1061–71.
Krug, B. and I. Staveren (2002), “Gender audit: whim or voice”, Public Finance and
Management, Volume 2, pp. 190–217.
Leadbetter, Helen (2006), Gender Budgeting, Department for International Development,
Policy Division, UK.
Meriç, Metin, Feminizme Mali Bakıs (2007), Finans, Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, Cilt
44, Sayı 509, ss. 58–67.
Mutlu, Aysegül ve A. Kadir ISIK (2005), Sağlık Ekonomisine Giris, Ekin Yayınları Bursa.
Orosz, J. F. (2001), “The truth is out there: Is post–modern budgeting the real deal?”, in J.
R. Bartle (edt), Evolving Theories, of Public Budgeting, Amsterdam Elsevier
Sciennce.
Rake, Katherine (2000) ‘Into the Mainstream? Why Gender Audit policymakers’ New
Economy, Vol 7 No 2, pp. 107–110.
Quisimbing, Agnes R. , Lawrence Haddad and Christina Pena (2001), “Are Women
Overrepresented Among the Poor, An Analysis of Poverty in 10 Developing
Countries”, Journal of Development Economics, Volume 66, pp. 225–69.
Sen, Amartya (1989), “Women’s Survival as a Development Problem”, Bulletin of the
American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Volume 43, pp. 14–29.
Sen, Gita (2000), “Gender Mainstreaming in Finance Ministries” World Development,
Volume 28, Number: 7, pp. 1379–90.
Sharp, Rohanda (2003), “Budgeting for Equity: Gender Budget Inititatives within a
Framework of Performance Oriented Budgeting”, UNIFEM.
Shick, A. (1993), “Budgetary Innovations” in A. Premchand, Government Budgeting and
Expenditure ontrols, Washington DC and IMF.
Stivers, C. (1993), Gender Images in Public Administration, New Bury Park CA, Sage
Publications.
Stotsky, Janet G. (2000), Gender Budgeting IMF Working Paper, WP 06/232.
SOSYAL ESĐTSĐZLĐKLERĐN GĐDERĐLMESĐNDE
BĐR ÇÖZÜM ÖNERĐSĐ : CĐNSĐYET ESASLI BÜTÇELEME
211
Stotsky, Janet G. (2005), “Gender Bias in Tax System”, Tax Notes International, June 9,
pp. 1913–23.
UNIFEM (2000), Progress of the World ‘s Women 2000, UNIFEM Biennial Report, New
York.
Walby, Sylvia (2008), Gender Budgeting: What is, How to do it. Why to do it, Lancaster
University, Unpublished Working Paper, UK.
Women’s Budget Group (2000), ‘Submission to H. M. Treasury on the proposal for an
Integrated Child Credit’, London.
White, O. F. (1995), Public Administration’s Gender Identity Problem, Administration
and Society, Volume 27, pp. 227–283.
www. un. org
www. worldbank. org
www. imf. org.
www. ksgm. com. tr
www. memurlar. net

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com