Buradasınız

Deliliğin Sosyal Temsilleri

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study is to investigate social representations phenomenon that generated through the meeting of information based on common sense versus scientific knowledge in the context of madness. The point aimed to be reached at in this study is to establish to which information form the madness knowledge has been transformed and integrated into. Until the beginning of this century, common sense knowledge, daily practises and medical knowledge and applications went hand in hand in Turkey. By the establishment of the republic, scientific knowledge has become prioritized information in daily practices. How this interacting develops between this type of knowledge and public's common sense knowledge is the main concern in this case. I order to evaluate it, discourse analysis was used as the investigation method. To evaluate the content of the information presented to public, the articles from 3 newspapers published throughout a year were assessed using discourse analysis. Because of the purpose using discourse analysis method is to reveal social representations by reaching at different ways of understanding, 29
23-70

REFERENCES

References: 

Ak~in, S.(1997). Ana (:izgileriyle Tiirkiye'nin Yakm TariM -1-. YenigUn Haber Ajansl Basm
YaYlncliJk A.$.
Arkona~. S. A., Paker, O. (1996). Turkiyc'de Kadln ve Modernite:Soylem Analizi ile Yakla~lm.
1996 )'Illnda Bogazir;i Oniversitesinde gen;;ekle~tiriJen IX.Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresinde
sunulmu~ bildiri.
Arkona,. S. A. (1998a). Sosyal Psikolojiye Giri,. (Baslmda).
Arkonar;, S. A. (1998b). Ttirkiyc'deki Terapist Soyleminde insan, Kahilr ve Terapi. 3P
Del~r:isi.(Baslmda).
Arslan, H. (1995). Pozitivizm Bir ideolojinin Anatomisi. Yayma hazlrlayan; Sabahattin Sen.
Tiirk Aydlnl ve Kimlik Sorunu. Baglam Yaymlan.
Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and Opinions. London: Sage.
Burr, V. (1995) An Jlllroductioll to Social Constructionism. London and New York: Routledge.
Edwards. D .. Potter. 1. (1992). Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
Farr, R. M. (1987). Social Representations: A French Tradition of Research. Journal for the
TheOlY of Social Behaviour, 17:4,343-370.
Farr, R. M. (1996). The Rools of Modern Social Psychology: 1872-1954. Blackwell.
Foucault, M. (1975). The Archeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
Foucault. M. (1979). Discipline alld Punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1995a). Akd ve Akd Bozuklugu Klasik (:agda Deliligin TariM. <;ev: Mehmet Ali
KllJybay. Ankara: fmge Kitabevi.
Foucault, M. (I995b). Ders NOllart 1970 - 1982. <;:ev: Selahattin Hilav. istanbul: Yapl Kredi
Yaymlan.
Ge~tan, E. (1995). Psikodinamik Psikiyatri ve Normal Dl~l Davranl~/ar. istanbul: Rernzi
Kitabcvi.
Gergen, K. (1973). Social Psychology as History. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, VoI.26,No.2,309-320.
Harre, R., Gillet. (1994). Discoursive Mind. London: Sage.
Harre, R. (1998). Singnlar Self. London: Sage.
Habermas, 1. (1991). The Philosophical Discollrse of Modernity Twelve Lectures. Translated by
Frederick G. Lawrence,The MIT Press Cambridge.
Koknel, O. (1989). Genel ve Klillik Psikiyatri. istanbul: Nobel Tip Kitabevi.
Krucs., Schwarz. (1992). Who pays the Bill? The Language of Social Representations. Cranach
Von, Doise, and Mugny, (Ed). Social RepresenlatiollS alld the Social Bases of
Knowledge. Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Mardin, ~. (1992), Tiirk Moderle~mesi Makafeler 4. Derleyenler;Mlirntaz'er Ttirkone,Tuncay
Ondert. istanbul: ileti~im YaYlnlan.
MOSCQvici, S. (1984a) Social Representations. R.Farr, S.Moscovici (Ed). Social
Representations. Cambridge University Press.
Moscovici, S. (1 984b). The Myth of Lonely Paradigm: A Rejoinder. Social Research, Vo1.51,
No.4, 939-968.
Moscovici. S. (1988). Notes Towards a Description of Social Representations. European
Journal o/Social Psychology, Vol. IS, 211-250.
OztUrk, O. (1994). Ruh Sagftgl ve BozlIklllklan Ankara: I-lekimler Yaym Birligi.
Parker, I. (1987). 'Social Representations'; Social Psychology's (mis) use of Sociology. Journal
for the Theory of Social Behaviolfr, 17:4, 447~469.
Parker, 1. (1989). The Crises in Modem Social Psycology and How to End it. London and New
York: Routlegde.
Parker, I., Shetter, J. (1990). Deconstrtlcting of Social Psychology, London and New York:
Routlegde.
Parker, I., Georgaca, E. ,Harper. D., Maclaughlin, N., T., Stowell-Smith. (1995) Deconstructing
Psychopathology London: Sage.
Pichat, Pierre. (1983). Un Steele de Psychiatrie. Produits Roche S.A.
Potter, J., Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage.
Potter, J., Wetherell, M. (1995). Discourse Analysis. Smith, l.A., Harre, R, Vanlangenhove. L.
(Ed). Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: Sage.
Poller, J. (1996). ' Represell1ing Reality' Discollrse,Relhoric and Social Construction.
London:Sage.
Rijrnans. J., Stroebe, W. (1989). The Two Social Psychologies or Whatever Happened to the
Crisis?Elfropean Journal of Socia! Psychology, VoI.J9, 339-344.
Roiser, M. (1987). Commen-sensc,Sciencc and Public Opinion. Journal for the Theory of Social
Behaviour, 17:4,41 ]-432.
Smith, J. A., Harre, R., Vanlangenhove, L. (1995). Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London:
Sage.
Tuna. K. (2000). Eallh Eilginin E{e~tirisi Ozerine. Ankara. Tlirkiye Diyanet Vakfl Yaymlan.
Tunaboylu - ikiz, T. (1995). Paris 13 Universitesinde hazlr1anrm~, yaymlanmaml~ doktora tczi.
Zangwill. O. L. (1990). Modern Psik%jinin Geli*imi. ~cv; Yllmaz Ozakpmar, Konya: Selyuk
Oniversitesi Yaymlan no; 81, Egitim FakOltesi Yaymlan no; 20.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com