Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

A CRITIQUE OF ‘ECONOMIC SUCCESS’ IN THE POPULAR CULTURE AND HISTORIOGRAPHY: A SEARCH FOR ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVES

Journal Name:

  • Tarih Okulu Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Tarihsel çerçevede neye ‘ekonomik başar.’ ad.n. verebileceğimiz noktas.nda Bat.l. tarihçiler dillendirilmemiş bir ittifak içerisindedirler. Buna göre tarihsel süreçte ekonomik başar. fiziki ç.kt. imalat.nda maksimum üretkenlik gösterenlere aittir. Özellikle endüstri devrimi anlat.lar.nda bu anlay.ş.n, veyahut varsay.m.n izlerini sürmek mümkün. Diğer taraftan, ekonomik başar.n.n ne olduğunun veya olmas. gerektiğinin tarifini tarihçiler değil popüler kültür yapmakta. Aç.k bir biçimde, tarihçiler modern zamanlara ait popüler ekonomik telakkilerin tesirinde kal.yor, ve tarihsel bağlamda ekonomik başar.y. bugün odakl. bir perspektiften yorumlay.p anakronizme düşüyorlar. Halbuki, modernite öncesi metinlerde bugünün ekonomik alg.lar.na alternatif anlay.şlar bulmak mümkün.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Historians in the West are tacitly unanimous on what we could call ‘economic success’ in the historical context: Those who have produced most physical output in the historical process are the most successful. In particular, the narratives on Industrial Revolution reflect this mindset, or assumption. On the other hand, the popular culture defines what economic success is or should be, not historians. It is obvious that historians are influenced by modern economic understandings, and by interpreting economic success presentmindedly, they fall into the trap of anachronism. Nonetheless, it is possible to find alternative economic understandings in pre-modern texts.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_175743_pp_1-17.pdf
  • 9
1-17
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Anthony Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1450 1680. Vol.
II: Expansion and Crisis (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993).
Arthur Just Jr., Luke: Ancient Christian Commentary on the Scripture
(InterVersity Press Academic, 2003).
Bernard Lewis, What Went Wrong: The Clash Between Islam and
Modernity in the Middle East (New York: Perennial, 2002).
Jack Canfield and Janet Switzer; The Success Principles(TM): How to
Get from Where You Are to Where You Want to Be (Harper Paperbacks, 2006).
J.R. McNeill and William H. McNeill, The Human Web: A Bird’s-Eye
View of World History (New York-London: W. W. Norton & Company, 2003).
Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic
Origins of Our Time (Boston: Beacon Press, 2001).
Kenneth Pommeranz, The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the
Making of the Modern World Economy (Princeton University Press, 2001).
Muhammed Yunus, Creating a World Without Poverty: Social Business
and the Future of Capitalism (New York: Publicaffairs, 2007).
Robert B. Marks, The Origins of the Modern World: Fate and Fortune in
the Rise of the West (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007).
Sabri Ülgener, İktisadi İnhitat Tarihimizin Ahlak ve Zihniyet Meseleleri
(İstanbul: İsmail Akgün Matbaas., 1951).
Sabri Ülgener, Zihniyet ve Din: Islam Çözülme Devri İktisat Ahlak.
(Istanbul: Derin Yay.nlar., 2006).
The Holy Qoran
The New Testament
Tristram Stuart, Waste: Uncovering the Global Food Scandal (W. W.
Norton & Company, 2009).
www.amazon.com
www.tristramstuart.co.uk/FoodWasteFacts.html

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com