Buradasınız

DOES FREQUENCY OF ONLINE SUPPORT USE HAVE AN EFFECT ON OVERALL GRADES?

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This study discusses online support in the Distance English Language Teaching (DELT) Program within the open education system at Anadolu University and whether the frequency of online support use has an effect on student grades. The DELT Program is a blended program in that it has both face-to-face and distance education components. The first two years are face-to-face while the last two years are through distance education. The distance education component in the last two years consists of courses which provide students with methodological and theoretical background essential for language teachers. The main instructional materials are textbooks and study guides. As there are no instructors in the distance education component, students are provided with online support which is designed to supplement the course books. Studies show that interaction increases quality thus enhances student learning in distance education. The aim of this study is to determine whether there is a relationship between frequency of log-ins and student grades. Analysis of average overall grades and frequency of log-ins showed that as the frequency of log-ins increases the grades also increase.
71-85

REFERENCES

References: 

Anderson, T. ( 2004 ). Toward a theory of online learning. In Theory and practice of
online learning. Canada : Athabasca University . (Retrieved Nov. 17, 2008 from
http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book)
Anderson, T. & F. Elloumi. ( 2004 ). Theory and practice of online learning. Canada :
Athabasca University http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book) . Retrieved Nov. 17,
2008.
Bonwell, C. C. and J. A. Eisen. (1991). Active Learning. Creating excitement in the
classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No.1) Washington DC: George
Washington University.
Gupta, B., D.A. White and A.D. Walmsley (2004). The attitudes of undergraduate
students and staff to the use of electronic learning. British Dental Journal 196, 487 -
492. Published online: 24 April 2004 | doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4811179
Kopkallı-Yavuz, H. & M. E. Mutlu. (2006). Internet Supported Learning Model in
Distance ELT Program at Anadolu University. 9th METU International ELT
Convention. 3-5 May 2006, Ankara, Turkey.
Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance
Education, 3(2), 1-6.
Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues interaction, presence,
and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,
6, 20-41.
Roblyer, M. D. and L. Ekhaml. (2000). How interactive are YOUR distance courses? A
rubric for assessing interaction in distance learning. Online Journal of Distance
Learning Administration, Volume III, Number II, Spring 2000. (Retrieved March 26,
2006 from http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/roblyer32.html)
Watkins, R. (2005). Developing interactive e-learning activities. Performance
Inprovement, 44, 5-7.
Smart, K. L. and J. J. Cappel. (2006). Students‘ Perceptions of Online Learning: A
Comparative Study. Journal of Information Technology Education, Volume 5.
85
Ozkul, A. E., G. Durmuşoğlu-Köse, A. Ozyar. (2002). A New Teacher Training Model
for Turkey: DELTT(Distance English Language Teacher Training Program). Open and
Distance Education Symposium. May 22-25,2005, Anadolu University, Eskisehir,
Turkey.
Valentine, D. (2002). Distance learning: Promises, problems, and possibilities.
Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Volume V, Number III, Fall
2002.
White, C. (2003). Language Learning in Distance Education. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Pres.
Zikrin, B. and D. Sumler. (1995). Interactive of non-interactive? That is thequestion!
An annotated bibliography. Journal of Distance Education, 10(1), 95-112.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com