Buradasınız

A PROPOSAL OF FRAMEWORK FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF TURKISH TEACHERS WITH RESPECT TO INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Studies in recent literature indicate that professional development programs for teachers addressing Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) are either inefficient or far from being productive. The reasons behind the inefficiency of such professional development activities are considered as the incompatibility between the level of training and teachers‘ ICT skills, and the lack of active use of ICTs by teachers in the teaching and learning processes. Bearing this problem in mind, the current study aims at proposing a framework for organizing professional development activities for Turkish teachers regarding ICTs with an emphasis on teachers‘ ICT-related needs, competencies and levels of technology use. Within the framework, it is suggested that teachers‘ levels and categories of technology use be determined in the first place, which will be followed by a fourstage professional development structure leading to teachers‘ effective ICT use and integration of ICTs in teaching-learning processes.

REFERENCES

References: 

Akkoyunlu, B. (2002). Use of Internet by teachers and their opinions on the issue.
Journal of Education, 22, 1 - 8.
Akbaba-Altun, S. 2006. Complexity of integrating computer technologies into
education in Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 9, 176-187.
Barnett, H. (2004). Technology professional development: successful strategies for
teacher change. ERIC clearinghouse on information and technology Syracuse NY.
(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED477616).
Cagiltay, K., Cakiroglu, J., Cagiltay, N. & Cakiroglu. E. (2001). Teachers‘ perspectives
about the use of computers in education, Journal of Education, 21, 19-28.
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. California: Corwin Press.
ISTE (2000). ISTE National Educational Technology Standards (Nets) and
Performance Indicators for Teachers. Retrieved September 20, 2005 from
http://www.iste.org
Karagiorgi, Y. & Charalambous, K. (2006). ICT in-service training and school practice:
in search fort he impact. Journal of Education for Teaching, 32, 395-411.
215
Lawler, P. A. (2003). Teacher as adult learners: a new perspective. New perspectives
on designing and implementing professional development of teachers of adults, Ed.:
Kathleen P. King, Patricia A. Lawler, New Directions for Adult and Continuing
Education, No:98, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Librera, W. L., Eyck, R.T., Dolan, J., Brady, J. & Aviss-Spedding, E. (2004). New Jersey
professional standards for teachers and school leaders. Professional Standards for
Teachers and School Leaders Initiative. Retrieved March 20, 2007, from
http://www.state.nj.us/njded/profdev/profstand/
Mandinach, E. & Cline, H. (1992). The impact of technological curriculum innovation
on teaching and learning activities. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the
American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California. (ERIC
Document Reproduction Service No. ED 345 717).
McNair, V. & Galanouli, D. (2002). Information and communications technology in
teacher education: can a reflective portfolio enhance reflective practice? Journal of
Information Technology for Teacher Education 11: 237-254.
Mouza, C. (2002). Learning to teach with new technology: implication of professional
development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 272-401.
Odabasi, H. F. & Kabakci, I. (2007). Information and communication technologies in
teachers‘ professional development. Paper presented in Hacettepe University and
Azerbaijan Government Pedagogy University, Symposium of International Teacher
Training Policies and Problems, May 12-14, in Baku, Azerbaijan.
OTA (Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of
Education). (1994). Technology and education reform. Retrieved March 20, 2007,
from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/EdReformStudies/EdTech.
Ozer, B. (2004). In-service training of teachers in Turkey at the beginning of the
2000s. Journal of In-service Education, 20, 89-100.
Rodriguez G. (2000). Critical issue: providing professional development for effective
technology use. North Central Regional Technology in Education Consortium.
Retrieved March 20, 2007, from
http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/methods/technlgy/te1000.htm
Seferoglu, S. S. (2001). Teachers‘ expectations and suggestions about their
professional development. Journal of National Education, 149, 12-18.
UNESCO (2002a). Information and Communication Technologies in Teacher
Education: A Planning Guide. Paris: Division of Higher Education.
UNESCO (2002b). Information and Communication Technologies in Teacher
Education: A Curriculum for Schools and Programme of Teacher Development. Paris:
Division of Higher Education.
216
Yalin, H. (2001). Evaluation of in-service education programs. Journal of National
Education, 150.
Yildirim, S. (2007). Current utilization of ICT in Turkish basic education schools: a
review of teacher's ICT use and barriers to integration. International Journal of
Instructional Media , 34, 367-378.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com