Buradasınız

From a Distance: Student Empowerment and Constructing Teacher Identities Online

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Online learning has infiltrated tertiary learning and teaching applications and offers enrichment in the construction of student learning through opportunities unfathomable for most university teachers when they were students. While all students benefit from online learning components that are supplemental to more traditional modes of teaching, it is the distance education students who are the most significant beneficiaries of these applications. This paper presents a framework developed towards ongoing dynamic evaluations of undergraduate units that are fully online on the WebCT platform in one of Australia's leading early childhood teacher education programs. It also describes a journey in which online learning and teaching experiences harnessed technology to better suit pedagogically-driven innovations and initiatives through unit content, instructional design and the emotionally supportive and empowering 'community spirit' created through online communications for distance education students. These experiences helped shape a platform of social discourse in constructing complex professional identities of pre-service early childhood teachers, and one of their teachers.

REFERENCES

References: 

Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at University. Buckingham, UK: Open
University Press.
Boud, D. & Miller, N. (1996). Animating learning from experience. In D. Boud and N. Miller
(Eds), Working with experience, (pp. 3-13). London: Routledge.
Bruce, C. S. (1998). The phenomenon of information literacy. Higher Education Research
and Development, 17 (1) 25-43.
Candy, P. C. (2000). Knowledge navigators and lifelong learners: Producing graduates for
the information society. Higher Education Research and Development, 19 (3), 261-27.
Dickson, J., Fleet, A. & Watt, H. (2000). Success or failure in a core university unit: What
makes the difference? Higher Education Research and Development, 19 (1), 59-74.
Furlong, J., Barton, L., Miles, S. & Whitty, G. (2000). Teacher education in transition.
Buckingham: Open University Press.
Grabinger, S. (1996). Rich environments for active learning. In D. Jonassen, (Ed.),
Handbook of research for educational telecommunications and technology, (pp. 665-692).
New York: MacMillan.
Herrington, J. & Oliver, R. (1999). Using situated learning and multimedia to investigate
higher-order thinking. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10 (1), 3-24.
McLoughlin, C. (1997). Thinking about thinking: Giving the students the HOTS for learning.
In R. Popisil & L. Willcoxson, The proceedings of the 6th annual learning forum. Murdoch
University, February 1997. Academic Services Unit, Murdoch University.
McLoughlin, C. (2000). Creating partnerships for generative learning and systemic change:
Redefining academic roles and relationships in support of learning. The International
Journal of Academic Development, 5 (2), 116-128.
Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourse, competing outcomes.
Journal of Educational Policy, 16 (2), 149-161.
Schank, R., Fano, A., Jona, M. & Bell, B. (1994). The design of goal-based scenarios. Journalof Learning Sciences, 3 (4), 305-345.
Talay-Ongan, A. & Gosper, M. (2000). Approaching student managed learning: Evaluations
of web-supported undergraduate units in early childhood. ASCILITE Conference,
Proceedings of Refereed Papers, (pp 595-603). Southern Cross University.
Talay-Ongan, A., McNaught, M., Edmonds, T. & Gosper, M. (2002). Collaborative learning
and teaching: Reflections on a facilitated journey. Journal of Research in International
Education, (23) 1, 97-104.
Walker, D. (1995). The preparation of constructivist leader. In L. Lambert, D. Walker, D. P.
Zimmerman, J. E. Cooper, M. D. Lambert, M. E. Gardner & P. J. Ford Slack (Eds), The
constructivist leader (pp.171-189). New York: Teachers College Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com