Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Informal Online Learning Practices: Implications for Distance Education

Journal Name:

  • Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
This qualitative ethnographic study examines five American teenagers' historical and current digitally-mediated multiliteracy practices within digital popular culture. The participants included three male and two female students of a private high school in the Midwestern United States. The study is framed by the notion that literacy is a socially, culturally, and historically situated discursive construct rather than a purely individualized cognitive endeavor. This social constructivist theory of literacy emphasizes the social conditions necessary to navigate the economic, social, and political worlds of the 21st century. The purpose of the study was to explore the students' multiliteracy practices that they enact through their activities within digital popular culture. Data collection methods included synchronous interviews facilitated by video conferencing tools as well as observation of the participants' online activities and member checks conducted via email and instant messaging. The analytic strategy employed during this study was informed by Clarke's (2005) situational analysis method. The study's findings indicate that literacy practices in which the study participants have engaged through informal learning activities within digital youth culture have had a much greater impact on enabling them to cultivate the multimodal literacies necessary within a postmodern digital era than have their formal educational experiences.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-informal-online-learning-practices-implications-distance-education.pdf
  • 2
18
28
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Adams, D., & Hamm, M. (2001). Literacy in a multimedia age. Norwood, Mass.: Christopher-Gordon.
Beach, R., & Lundell, D. (1998). Early adolescents' use of computer-mediated communication in writing and reading. In D. Reinking (Ed.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic wordd(pp. 93- 112). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bruce, B. C., & Hogan, M. P. (1998). The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic wordd. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Chandler-Olcott, K., & Mahar, D. (2003). "Tech savviness" meets multiliteracy: Exploring adolescent girls' technology-related literacy practices. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 356-385.
Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gee, J. P. (1996). Social iinguistics and iiteracies: Ideology in discourses. New York: Falmer.
Gee, J. P. (2000). The new literacy studies: From socially situated to the work of the social. In D.
Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp.180-196). London: Routledge.
Gee, J. P., Hull, G., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. Boulder: Westview Press.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Gitelman, L., & Pingree, G. B. (2003). What's new about new media? In L. Gitelman, & G. B. Pingree (Eds.), New media (pp. 1740-1915). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hawisher, G. E., & Selfe, C. (2004). Literate lives in the information age: Narratives of literacy from the United States. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
27
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, October 2010, 1(2)
Hine, T.
(1999)
. The rise and fall of the American teenager: A new history of the American adolescent experience. New York: Avon Books, Inc.
Kellner. D. (2002). New media and new literacies: Reconstructing education for the new millennium. In L. Lievroux & S. Livingstone (eds). The handbook of new media. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kellner, D., & Share (2005). Toward critical media literacy: Core concepts, debates, organizations, and policy. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 26(3), 369-386.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
Lankshear, C., Gee, J., Knobel, M., & Searle, C. (1997). Changing literacies. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004). "New" literacies: Research and social practice. Plenary address for annual meeting of the national reading conference, San Antonio, 2 December 2004.
Lave, J., & Wenger. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lemke, J. L. (1998). Metamedia literacy: transforming meanings and media. In D. Reinking, M.C.
McKenna, & L. D. Labbo (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformation in a post-typographic world (pp. 283-302). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erbium Associates.
Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communications Review, 7, 3-14.
Luke, A. (2002). What happens to literacies old and new when they're turned into policy. In D.
Alvermann (Ed), Adolescents and iiteracies in a digital world (pp. 186-203). New York: Lang.
Mead, M. (1970/1978). Culture and comment: The new relationships between the generations in the 1970s. New York: Columbia University Press.
New London Group (NLG) (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracy: Designing social futures. In B. Cope, & M. Kalantzis (2000), Multiliteracy: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9¬38). London: Routledge.
Pink, S. (2001). Doing visual ethnography. London: Sage.
Rowan, L., Knobel, M., Bigum, C., & Langshear, C. (2001). Boys, iiteracies and schooling: The
dangerous territories of gender-basediiteracy reform. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Selfe, C. L. (1999). Technology and literacy in the twenty-first century: The importance of paying attention. Carbondale: University of Southern Illinois Press.
Van Dijk, J. (1999). The network society: Social aspects of new media. London: Sage.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com