Buradasınız

İnsülin Kullanan Tip 2 Diabetes Mellituslu Hastalarda Diyabet Eğitimi ve Metabolik Kontrol

Diabetes Education and Metabolic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Under Insulin Treatment

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease which may lead to degenerative complications in long-term. Effective glycemic control can prevent the occurence of complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of repeated diabetes education programme given in long term on glucose and lipid metabolisms in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients under insulin treatment. One hundred thirty patients without chronic complications were retrospectively evaluated. Fifty three patients completed the education and therapy programmes (education group) while 77 only joined the therapy programme (control group). The age, gender, diabetes duration, baseline blood pressure (BP) and metabolic parameters of the patients in both groups were similar. A1C, fasting and post-prandial glucose levels and systolic BP values of the patients in the education group significantly decreased after the education while systolic BP value increased in the control group. In the education group HDL-chol levels increased from 40 ± 9 mg/dl to 49 ± 14 mg/dl at 6th month. Our study suggests that a comprehensive and frequently repeated diabetes education programme is effective in the achievement of metabolic control.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Diabetes mellitus uzun dönemde dejeneratif komplikasyonlara yol açabilen kronik bir hastalıktır. Glisemik kontrol komplikasyonların gelişimini engelleyebilir. Bu çalışmada insülin kullanan tip 2 diabetes mellituslu hastalarda sık tekrarlı diyabet eğitiminin uzun dönemde glukoz ve lipid metabolizması üzerine etkisini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Kronik komplikasyonsuz 130 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi. 53 hastanın eğitim ve tedavi programını tamamladığı (eğitim gurubu), 77’sinin sadece tedaviye devam ettiği saptandı (kontrol gurubu). Her iki guruptaki hastaların yaş, cinsiyet, diyabet süreleri, başlangıç kan basıncı (KB) ve metabolik değerleri benzerdi. Eğitim gurubundaki hastaların eğitim sonrası A1C, açlık ve tokluk kan şekeri ve sistolik KB değerleri anlamlı düşerken kontrol gurubunda sistolik KB değeri anlamlı arttı. Eğitim gurubunda HDL-kol düzeyleri 6. ayda 40 ± 9 mg/dl’den 49 ± 14 mg/dl’ye yükseldi. Çalışmamız kapsamlı ve sık tekrarlı bir diyabet eğitim programının metabolik kontrolün sağlanmasında etkili olduğunu düşündürmektedir.
43-47

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Harris MI, Klein R, Welborn TA, Knuiman MW. Onset of
NIDDM occurs at least 4-7 yr before clinical diagnosis.
Diabetes Care 1992;15: 815-9.
2. Hamman RF, Mayer EJ, Moo-Young GA, Hildebrandt W,
Marshall JA, Baxter J. Prevalence and risk factors of diabetic
retinopathy in non-Hispanic whites and Hispanics with
NIDDM. San Luis Valley Diabetes Study. Diabetes
1989;38:1231-7.
3. Haffner SM, Mitchell BD, Pugh JA, et al. Proteinuria in
Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites with NIDDM.
Diabetes Care 1989;12:530-6.
4. Roman SH, Harris MI. Management of diabetes mellitus from
a public health perspective. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am
1997;26:443-74.
5. Clark CM, Fradkin JE, Hiss RG, Lorenz RA, Vinicor F,
Warren-Boulton E. Promoting early diagnosis and treatment
of type 2 diabetes: the National Diabetes Education Program.
JAMA 2000; 284:363-5.
6. American Diabetes Association: Pharmacological treatment of
hyperglycemia in NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1996;19(Suppl.):
S54. Tip 2 Diabetes Mellituslu Hastalarda Diyabet Eğitimi
47
7. Kaplan RM, Davis WK. Evaluating the costs and benefits of
outpatient diabetes education and nutrition counseling.
Diabetes Care 1986;9:81-6.
8. Harris MI, Cowie CC, Howie LJ. Self-monitoring of blood
glucose by adults with diabetes in the United States
population. Diabetes Care 1993;16:1116-23.
9. American Diabetes Association: third-party reimbursement for
diabetes care, self management, education and supplies.
Diabetes Care 1997;20(Suppl.1):S61.
10. The Diabetes Control and Complication Trial Research
Group: The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the
development of long term complications in insulin dependent
diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993:329:977-86.
11. Erdoğan G, Güllü S, Erdoğan MF, Başkal N, Kamel N, Uysal
AR. Influence of patient education on glycemic control in
diabetic patients. Turkish Journal of Endocrinology and
Metabolism 1998;2:101-4.
12. Gilmer TP, O’Connor PJ, Manning WG, Rush WA. The cost
to health plans of poor glycemic control. Diabetes Care
1997;20:1847-53.
13. The Diabetes Control and Complications Research Group.
Effect of intensive diabetes management on macrovascular
events and risk factors in the Diabetes Control and
Complications Trial. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:894-903.
14. Abraira C, Colwell JA, Nuttall FQ, et al. Veterans Affairs
Cooperative Study on glycemic control and complications in
type II diabetes (VACSDM). Results of a feasibility trial.
Diabetes Care 1995;18:1113-23.
15. Turner RC, Holman RR. Lessons from UK prospective
diabetes study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995;28 Suppl:S151-
7.
16. Polonsky WH, Earles J, Smith S, et al. Integrating medical
management with diabetes self-management training: a
randomized control trial of the Diabetes Outpatient Intensive
Treatment program. Diabetes Care 2003;26:3048-53.
17. Wilson C, Brown T, Acton K, Gilliland S. Effects of clinical
nutrition education and educator discipline on glycemic
control outcomes in the Indian health service. Diabetes Care
2003;26:2500-4.
18. Afridi MA, Khan MN. Role of health education in the
management of diabetes mellitus. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak
2003;13:558-61.
19. Karter AJ, Ferrara A, Darbinian JA, Ackerson LM, Selby JV.
Self monitoring of blood glucose: language and financial
barriers in a managed care population with diabetes. Diabetes
Care 2000;23:477-83.
20. Rothman R, Malone R, Bryant B, Horlen C, DeWalt D,
Pignone M. The relationship between literacy and glycemic
control in a diabetes disease-management program.Diabetes
Educ 2004;30:263-73.
21. Uitewaal PJ, Voorham AJ, Bruijnzeels MA, et al. No clear
effect of diabetes education on glycaemic control for Turkish
type 2 diabetes patients: a controlled experiment in general
practice. Neth J Med 2005; 63: 428-34.
22. van den Arend IJ, Stolk RP, Rutten GE, Schrijvers GJ.
Education integrated into structured general practice care for
type 2 diabetic patients results in sustained improvement of
disease knowledge and self-care. Diabet Med 2000;7:190-7.
23. Jiang YD, Chuang LM, Wu HP, et al. Assessment of the
function and effect of diabetes education programs in Taiwan.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1999;46:177-82.
24. Garcia R, Suarez R. Diabetes education in the elderly: a 5-
year follow-up of an interactive approach. Patient Educ Couns
1996;29:87-97.
25. Rickheim PL, Weaver TW, Flader JL, Kendall DM.
Assessment of group versus individual diabetes education: a
randomized study. Diabetes Care 2002;25:269-74.
26. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Selfmanagement education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a metaanalysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care
2002;25:1159-71.
27. Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams RD. Group based
training for self-management strategies in people with type 2
diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2005;2:CD003417.
28. Domenech MI, Assad D, Mazzei ME, Kronsbein P,
Gagliardino JJ. Evaluation of the effectiveness of an
ambulatory teaching/treatment programme for non-insulin
dependent (type 2) diabetic patients. Acta Diabetol
1995;32:143-7.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com