High school students educational usage of Internet and their learning approaches

American Association of School Librarians (2008). Standards for the 21st Century Learner.
http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/aasl/guidelinesandstandards/learningst...
ngStandards.pdf [November 10, 2009].
Asselin, M., & Moayeri, M.. (2008). Toward a Pedagogy for Using the Internet to Learn: An
Examination of Adolescent Internet Literacies and Teachers', Parents' and Students'
Recommendations for Educational Change. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the
International Association of School Librarianship.
http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1561027241&sid=2&Fmt=2&clientId=46825...
VName=PQD [November 10, 2009].
Buck, M. E.. (2008). The Association Between Student Approaches to Studying, Students’ Evaluations
of Teaching Effectiveness and Measures of Student Learning. Doctorate Dissertation. California:
TUI University College of Education.
Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. ( 2002). The relationship between learning approaches and learning
outcomes: a study of Irish accounting students. Accounting Education. 11(1), 27 - 42.
Case, J, & Marshall, D. (2004). Between deep and surface: procedural approaches to learning in
engineering education contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 29(5), 605-615.
Cheung W., & Huang, W. (2005). Proposing a framework to assess Internet usage in university
education: an empirical investigation from a student’s perspective. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 36(2), 237–253
Cope, C, & Staehr, L. (2005). Improving students’ learning approaches through intervention in an
information systems learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 181-197.
Crawford, K., Gordon ,S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1998). Qualitatily Different Experiences Of
Learning Mathematics at University . Learning and Instruction, 8 (5), 455–468.
Çolak, E. & Fer, S. (2007). Öğrenme Yaklaşımları Envanterinin Dilsel Eşdeğerlik, Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik
Çalışması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(1), 197-212.
http://sosyalbilimler.cukurova.edu.tr/dergi/dosyalar/2007.16.1.407.pdf [November 10, 2009].
Eisenberg, M. B. (2003). Implementing information skills: Lessons learned from the Big6 approach to
information problem-solving. School Libraries in Canada, 22(4), 20-23.
Gullbekk E., Skagen, T., Tonning, A.S.V., Torras, M.C. (2009). Information Literacy and Changes within
Higher Education. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 1(1), 1-3.
Gordon, C. & Debus, R. (2002) Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy
within a preservice teaching education context, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4),
483–512.
Hall, M, Ramsay, A., & Raven, J.( 2004). Changing the learning environment to promote deep
learning approaches in first-year accounting students. Accounting Education. 13(4), 89-505.
M. Betül Yılmaz & Feza Orhan / World Journal on Educational Technology 100-112
112
Holcomb, L. B. Castek, J. M. & Johnson, P. R. (2007). Unlocking the Potential of K-12 Classroom
Websites to Enhance Learning. New England Reading Association Journal; 43(1), 36-43.
Kember D., Biggs, J., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to
learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire.
British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 261-280.
Laird, T. F. N., Shoup, R. , Kuh G. D. , & Schwarz, M. J. (2008). The Effects of Discipline on Deep
Approaches to Student Learning and College Outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49 (6),
469-481.
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Pew Internet and American life project: Teens and
technology. http://www.pewInternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Tech_July2005, web.pdf [November
10, 2009].
Leung, D. Y. P, & Kember, D. (2003). The relationship between approaches to learning and reflection
upon practice. Educational Psychology, 23(1), 61-71.
Marton, F. & Säljö , R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I. Outcome and process, British
Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
MEB (2010). Intel Öğretmen Programı. Eğitim Teknolojilieri Genel Müdürlüğü.
http://ogretmenprogrami.meb.gov.tr/projegelisim.asp [August 17, 2010].
Mimirinis, M., & Bhattacharya, M. (2007). Design of Virtual Learning Environments for Deep
Learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(1), 55-64.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2006). Are students ready
for a technology-rich world? What PISA studies tell us.
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/28/4/35995145.pdf [November 10, 2009].
Quellmalz, E. S., & Kozma, R. (2003). Designing Assessments of Learning with Technology.
Assessment in Education, 10(3), 389-407.
Richardson, J. T. E., & Price, L. (2003). Approaches to Studying and Perceptions of Academic Quality
in Electronically Delired Courses. British Journal of Educational Technology. 34(1), 45-56.
Todd, R. (2008). Youth and their networked worlds: Research results and implications for school
libraries. School Libraries Worldwide, 14(2), 19-34.
Todd, R., & Kuhlthau, C. (2005). Student learning through Ohio school libraries, Part 1: How effective
school libraries help students. School Libraries Worldwide, 11(1), 89-110.
Wallace R. M. (2004). A Framework for Understanding Teaching With the Internet. American
Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 447-488.
Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students'
approaches to learning: comparing conditional and action learning designs. Assessment &
Evaluation in Higher Education. 30(1), 87-101.
Zeegers, P.( 2001). Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study. British Journal of
Educational Psychology. 71, 115–132.