High school students educational usage of Internet and their learning approaches

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This study examines the Internet usage of high school students for educational needs in respect to their learning approaches. The “learning approach” categorizes individuals as ‘surface learners’ and ‘deep learners’. Surface learners mainly choose to rehearse and memorize the course material they work on and they acquire the information they need to learn in a disconnected way, by memorization. On the other hand, deep learners want to grasp the meaning of the course material. In the study, adapted Turkish version of Learning Process Questionnaire (LPQ) was used to determine high school students’ learning approaches. 921 secondary school students were subjected and the Cronbach alpha values were 0.73 for a deep approach and 0.66 for a surface approach. According to the data obtained, surface learners use the Internet more when compared to deep learners, though they use it for non-instructional purposes. The ratios of the Internet use of deep learners for educational needs are higher when compared to those of surface learners. Ratios of the Internet use for educational needs by the students who are given assignments requiring the use of the Internet are higher.



American Association of School Librarians (2008). Standards for the 21st Century Learner.
ngStandards.pdf [November 10, 2009].
Asselin, M., & Moayeri, M.. (2008). Toward a Pedagogy for Using the Internet to Learn: An
Examination of Adolescent Internet Literacies and Teachers', Parents' and Students'
Recommendations for Educational Change. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the
International Association of School Librarianship.
VName=PQD [November 10, 2009].
Buck, M. E.. (2008). The Association Between Student Approaches to Studying, Students’ Evaluations
of Teaching Effectiveness and Measures of Student Learning. Doctorate Dissertation. California:
TUI University College of Education.
Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. ( 2002). The relationship between learning approaches and learning
outcomes: a study of Irish accounting students. Accounting Education. 11(1), 27 - 42.
Case, J, & Marshall, D. (2004). Between deep and surface: procedural approaches to learning in
engineering education contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 29(5), 605-615.
Cheung W., & Huang, W. (2005). Proposing a framework to assess Internet usage in university
education: an empirical investigation from a student’s perspective. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 36(2), 237–253
Cope, C, & Staehr, L. (2005). Improving students’ learning approaches through intervention in an
information systems learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 181-197.
Crawford, K., Gordon ,S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1998). Qualitatily Different Experiences Of
Learning Mathematics at University . Learning and Instruction, 8 (5), 455–468.
Çolak, E. & Fer, S. (2007). Öğrenme Yaklaşımları Envanterinin Dilsel Eşdeğerlik, Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik
Çalışması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(1), 197-212.
http://sosyalbilimler.cukurova.edu.tr/dergi/dosyalar/2007.16.1.407.pdf [November 10, 2009].
Eisenberg, M. B. (2003). Implementing information skills: Lessons learned from the Big6 approach to
information problem-solving. School Libraries in Canada, 22(4), 20-23.
Gullbekk E., Skagen, T., Tonning, A.S.V., Torras, M.C. (2009). Information Literacy and Changes within
Higher Education. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 1(1), 1-3.
Gordon, C. & Debus, R. (2002) Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy
within a preservice teaching education context, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4),
Hall, M, Ramsay, A., & Raven, J.( 2004). Changing the learning environment to promote deep
learning approaches in first-year accounting students. Accounting Education. 13(4), 89-505.
M. Betül Yılmaz & Feza Orhan / World Journal on Educational Technology 100-112
Holcomb, L. B. Castek, J. M. & Johnson, P. R. (2007). Unlocking the Potential of K-12 Classroom
Websites to Enhance Learning. New England Reading Association Journal; 43(1), 36-43.
Kember D., Biggs, J., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to
learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire.
British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 261-280.
Laird, T. F. N., Shoup, R. , Kuh G. D. , & Schwarz, M. J. (2008). The Effects of Discipline on Deep
Approaches to Student Learning and College Outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49 (6),
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Pew Internet and American life project: Teens and
technology. http://www.pewInternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Tech_July2005, web.pdf [November
10, 2009].
Leung, D. Y. P, & Kember, D. (2003). The relationship between approaches to learning and reflection
upon practice. Educational Psychology, 23(1), 61-71.
Marton, F. & Säljö , R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I. Outcome and process, British
Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
MEB (2010). Intel Öğretmen Programı. Eğitim Teknolojilieri Genel Müdürlüğü.
http://ogretmenprogrami.meb.gov.tr/projegelisim.asp [August 17, 2010].
Mimirinis, M., & Bhattacharya, M. (2007). Design of Virtual Learning Environments for Deep
Learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(1), 55-64.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2006). Are students ready
for a technology-rich world? What PISA studies tell us.
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/28/4/35995145.pdf [November 10, 2009].
Quellmalz, E. S., & Kozma, R. (2003). Designing Assessments of Learning with Technology.
Assessment in Education, 10(3), 389-407.
Richardson, J. T. E., & Price, L. (2003). Approaches to Studying and Perceptions of Academic Quality
in Electronically Delired Courses. British Journal of Educational Technology. 34(1), 45-56.
Todd, R. (2008). Youth and their networked worlds: Research results and implications for school
libraries. School Libraries Worldwide, 14(2), 19-34.
Todd, R., & Kuhlthau, C. (2005). Student learning through Ohio school libraries, Part 1: How effective
school libraries help students. School Libraries Worldwide, 11(1), 89-110.
Wallace R. M. (2004). A Framework for Understanding Teaching With the Internet. American
Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 447-488.
Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students'
approaches to learning: comparing conditional and action learning designs. Assessment &
Evaluation in Higher Education. 30(1), 87-101.
Zeegers, P.( 2001). Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study. British Journal of
Educational Psychology. 71, 115–132.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com