Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Outdoors and Online – inquiry with mobile devices in pre-service science teacher education

Journal Name:

  • World Journal on Educational Technology

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study presents first findings about the development of an inquiry-based approach in pre-service teacher training. After reports of students who felt ill equipped to teach adequately about biodiversity, an inquiry-based learning course about biodiversity was created, using new technologies and an autonomous and collaborative learning environment. Compared to the traditional university course, research showed advantages in motivational and cognitive areas within the students tested.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_159831_4_pp_113-125.pdf
  • 2
113-125
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (2011). Cooperation in the classroom: The jigsaw method. London: Pinter & Martin, Ltd.
Asay, L. & Orgill, M. (2010). Analysis of Essential Features of Inquiry Found in The Science Teacher 1998-2007. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 57-79.
Barrett, M. (2007). Homework and fieldwork: investigations into the rhetoric–reality gap in environmental education research and pedagogy. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 209-223.
Deci, E. & Ryan, R. (2011). The Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. Retrieved: 27.11.2011 from http://www.selfdeterminationtheory.org/ questionnaires
Dikmenli, M. (2010). Biology student teachers' conceptual frameworks regarding biodiversity. Education, 19(3), 479-490.
Steffen Schaal et all. / World Journal on Educational Technology (2012) 113-125
124
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49, 1037-1065.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Traxler, J., (2007). Design for Mobile and Wireless Technologies (Eds. H. Beetham & R. Sharpe), Rethinking Pedagogy for the Digital Age (pp. 295–310). London: Routledge
Lindemann-Matthies, P. et al. (2009).The integration of biodiversity education in the initial education of primary school teachers: four comparative case studies from Europe. Environmental Education Research, 15(1), 17-37.
Lindemann-Matthies, P., Constantinou, C., Lehnert, H., Nagel, U., Raper, G., Kadji-Beltran, C., (2011) Confidence and Perceived Competence of Preservice Teachers to Implement Biodiversity Education in Primary Schools—Four comparative case studies from Europe International Journal of Science Education, 33(16), 2247-2273
Makrakis, V. (2010). The challenge of WikiQuESD as an environment for constructing knowledge in teaching and learning for sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 1(1), 50-57.
Menzel, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2008). The Loss of Biodiversity as a Challenge for Sustainable Development: How Do Pupils in Chile and Germany Perceive Resource Dilemmas? Research in Science Education, 39(4), 429-447.
Minner, D., Levy, A., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science Instruction - what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474-496.
Mui, W., So, W., Ying, N., & Ching, F. (2011). Creating a Collaborative Science Learning Environment for Science Inquiry at the Primary Level. Education, 3, 559-569.
So, W. & Ching, N. (2011). Creating a collaborative science learning environment for science inquiry at the primary level. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 559-569.
Orion, N. (2003). The outdoor as a central learning environment in the global Science Literacy Framework: From theory to practice.(Eds V. J. Mayer), Implementing global science literacy (pp. 53–66). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Ramadoss, A. (2011). Biodiversity Conservation through Environmental Education for Sustainable Development - A Case Study from Puducherry , India. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 1(2).
Ruchter, M., Klar, B., & Geiger, W. (2010). Comparing the effects of mobile computers and traditional approaches in environmental education. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1054-1067.
Steffen Schaal et all. / World Journal on Educational Technology (2012) 113-125
125
Schaal, S. (2009). Selbststeuerung und kooperatives Lernen in der Biologielehrerausbildung – kognitive und motivationale Effekte einer alternativen Seminarform. (Eds. Harms et al.), Heterogenität erfassen - individuell fördern im Biologieunterricht. Int. Tagung der FDdB. Kiel: IPN, 108-110.
Schaal, S. (2010). Enriching traditional biology lectures - digital concept maps and their influence on cognition and motivation. World Journal on Educational Technology, 2(1), 42-54.
Schaal, S & Randler, C (2004). Konzeption und Evaluation eines computergestützten kooperativen Kompaktseminars zur Systematik der Blütenpflanzen. Zeitschrift für Hochschuldidaktik, 4(1), 1-18.
Schaal, S., Bogner, F. X. & Girwidz, R. (2010). Concept Mapping Assessment of Media Assisted Learning in Interdisciplinary Science Education. Research in Science Education, 40, 339-352.
Specht, M. & Ebner, M. (2011). Mobiles und ubiquitäres Lernen. Technologien und didaktische Aspekte. (Eds. M. Ebner & S. Schön), L3T - Lehrbuch für Lernen und Lehren mit Technologien. http://l3t.eu [29.11.2011]
Ulbrich, K., Settele, J. & Benedict, F. (2010). Biodiversity in Education for Sustainable Development – Reflection on School-Research Cooperation. Sofia: Pensoft Publishers.
Wahl, D. (2001). Nachhaltige Wege vom Wissen zum Handeln. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 19 (2), 157-174.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com