Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

İŞ YAŞAMINDAKİ YÖNETİCİ LİDERLİĞE VE SİYASİ LİDERLİĞE YÖNELİK ÖRTÜK LİDERLİK TEORİLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

THE COMPARISON OF BUSSINESS AND POLITICAL IMPLICIT LEADERSHIP THEORIES

Journal Name:

  • Yönetim-İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
With the help of cognitive structures named "implicit leadership theories" people categorize others as leaders or not. The aim of this study is to investigate the implicit leadership theories about business and political leaders, to determine the differences between them and investigate them according to some variables. The sample of the study is composed of 278 respondents. From the respondents 148 of them were asked the characteristics of business leaders, 130 of them were asked the characteristics of political leaders. After coding procedures, 183 categories were derived. There are common characteristics for both leadership types such as just, hardworking, honest, trustworthy, the art of public speaking, far-sighted, persuasive, cultured, intelligent. For the business leaders, women mentioned openness to change more and men being disciplined; younger respondents expected them to be tolerant, far-sighted and intelligent, older ones emphasized being democratic. For the political leaders women mentioned being well educated more, while men more emphasized being trustworthy and being close to the public; older respondents mentioned being just, trustworthy and attached to the family more. This study sheds some light on the implicit leadership theories of Turkish society in two different leadership areas.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bireyler, "örtük liderlik teorileri" olarak isimlendirilen bilişsel yapılar aracılığıyla karşılarındakileri lider ya da lider olmayan şeklinde sınıflandırır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, iş yaşamındaki yönetici liderliğe ve siyasi liderliğe dair örtük teorilerini incelemek, farklarını saptamak ve bunların belirli değişkenlere göre değişimini incelemektir. Çalışmanın örneklemini farklı sektörlerden 278 kişi oluşturmaktadır. Katılımcıların 148'ine (%53.2) yöneticilik pozisyonunda bulunan bir liderin özellikleri sorulurken, 130'una (%46.8) siyasi bir liderin özellikleri sorularak liderlik prototipleri incelenmiştir. Cevaplar araştırmacılar tarafından içerik analizine tabi tutularak 183 başlık altında kodlanmıştır. Her iki liderlik türü için de ortak olarak en fazla söylenen özellikler arasında adil, çalışkan, dürüst, güvenilir, hitabet yeteneği olan, ileri görüşlü, ikna edici, kültürlü, zeki gibi karakteristikler vardır. Yönetici liderler için, kadınlar yenilikçi, erkekler ise disiplinli olma özelliğini; daha genç olanlar hoşgörülü-anlayışlı, ileri görüşlü ve zeki olma, daha yaşlı olanlarsa demokratik olma özelliğini daha çok vurgulamışlardır. Siyasi liderlik için, kadınlar iyi eğitimli, erkekler dürüst ve halkla iç içe olma özelliklerini; daha yaşlı olanlarsa adil, dürüst ve ailesine bağlı olma özelliklerini daha fazla söylemişlerdir. Bu çalışma bizlere Türk toplumunun iki farklı liderliğe dair örtük liderlik teorileri hakkında ışık tutmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-yasamindaki-yonetici-liderlige-siyasi-liderlige-yonelik-ortuk-liderlik-teorilerinin-karsilastirilmasi.pdf
  • 67
52-66
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

AYÇAN, Z. ve diğ., 2000, "Impact of Culture on Human Resource Management Practices:10-Country Comparison", Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol: 49, s: 192-221.
BASS, B.M., AVOLIO, B.J., 1989, "Potential Biases in Leadership Measures: How Prototypes, Leniency, and General Satisfaction Relate to Ratings and Rankings of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Constructs", Educational andPsychologicalMeasurement, Vol: 49, s: 505-527.
BEM, S., 1974, "The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny", Journal of Consulting and ClinicalPsychology, Vol: 42, No: 2, s: 155-162.
BİLGİN, N., 2006, Sosyal Bilimlerde içerik Analizi: Teknikler ve Örnek Çalışmalar, Anlara, Siyasal Kitabevi.
BRODBECK, F.C. ve diğ., 2000, "Cultural Variation of Leadership Prototypes Across 22 European Countries", Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, Vol: 73, No: 1, s: 1-29.
CRONSHAW, S.F., LORD, R.G., 1987, "Effects of Leader Prototypicality, Consensus Information, and Encoding Processes on Leadership Perceptions ", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol: 72, s: 97-106.
DEAL, J.J., STEVENSON, M.A., 1998, "Perceptions of Female and Male Managers in the 1990s", Sex Roles, Vol: 38, s: 287-300.
DUNNING, D., PERIE, M., STORY, A.L., 1991, "Self-ServingPrototypes of Social Categories", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol: 61, s: 957¬968.
EAGLY, A.H., KARAU, S.J., MAKHIJANI, M.G., 1995, "Gender and Effectiveness of Leaders: A Meta-Analysis", Psychological Bulletin, Vol: 117, No: 1, s: 125-145.
EPITROPAKI, O., MARTIN, R., 2004, "implicit Leadership Theories in Applied Settings: Factor Structure, Generalizability and Stability Over Time ", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol: 89, s: 293-310.
EPITROPAKI, O., MARTIN, R., 2005, "From ideal to Real: A Longitudinal Study of implicit Leadership Theories, Leader-Member Exchanges and Employee Outcomes", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol: 90, s: 659-676.
FRASER, S. L., LORD, R. G., 1988, "Stimulus Prototypicality and General Leadership Impressions: Their Role in Leadership and Behavioral Ratings", The Journal of Psychology, Vol: 122, No: 3, s: 291-303.
63
İlknur Özalp Türetgen / Sevim Cesur
Yönetim Yıl: 21 Sayı 67 Ekim 2010
FOTI, R.J., FRASER, S.L., LORD, R.G., 1982, "Effects of Leadership Labels and
Prototypes on Perceptions of Political Leaders", Journal of Applied
Psychology, Vol: 67 No: 3, s: 326-333. FOTI, R.J., HAUENSTEIN, N.M.A., 2007, "Pattern and Variable Approaches in
Leadership Emergence and Effectiveness", Journal of Applied Psychology,
Vol: 92, No: 2, s:347-355.
FOTI, R., LORD, R., 1987, "Prototypes and Scripts: The Effects of Alternative Methods of Processing Information on Rating Accuracy", Organizational Behavior andHuman Decision Making Processes, Vol: 39, s: 318-340.
FOTI, R.J., MINER, J.B., 2003, "Individual Differences and Organizational Forms in the Leadership Process", Leadership Quarterly, Vol: 14, No: 1, s: 83-112.
GERSTNER, C., DAY, D., 1994, "Cross-Cultural Comparison of Leadership Prototypes", Leadership Quarterly, Vol: 5, s: 121-134.
HOFSTEDE, G., 1980, "Motivation, Leadership and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad?" Organizational Dynamics, Vol: 9, No: 1, s: 42-63.
HOFSTEDE, G., 1983, "The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories", Journal of International Business Studies, Vol: 14, s: 75-89.
HOFSTEDE, G., 1991, Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind,
London, McGraw-Hill.
HOFSTEDE, G., 1998, Masculinity and Femininity: The Taboo Dimension of National Cultures, Thousand Oaks, Sage.
HOUSE, R. J., JAVIDAN, M., DORFMAN, P., 2001, "Project Globe: An Introduction", Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol: 50, No: 4, s: 489-505.
İMAMOĞLU, E.O., KARAKİTAPOĞLU-AYGÜN, Z., 1999, "1970'lerden 1990 'lora Değerler: Üniversite Düzeyinde Gözlenen Zaman, Kuşak Ve Cinsiyet Farklılıkları", Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Vol: 14, No: 44, s: 1-22.
JOHNSON, B.E., 2007, Taking the Child to Work: The Relationship of Adult Attachment Styles and Implicit Leadership Theories in Organizational Settings, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Regent University, VA, USA.
KABASAKAL, H., BODUR, M., 2007, "Leadership and Culture in Turkey: A Multi-Faceted Phenomenon". J.Chhokar, F.Brodbeck, & R. House (Ed.), Managerial Cultures of the World: A GLOBE Report of In-depth Studies of the Cultures of 25 Countries içinde, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
64
İlknur Özalp Türetgen / Sevim Cesur
Yönetim Yıl: 21 Sayı 67 Ekim 2010
KARAKITAPOGLU-AYGUN, Z., IMAMOGLU, E.O., 2002, "Value Domains Of Turkish Adults And University Students ", The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol: 142, No: 3, s: 333-352.
KELLER, T., 1999, "Images of the Familiar: Individual Differences and Implicit Leadership Theories", The Leadership Quarterly, Vol: 10, No: 4, s: 589-607.
KONRAD, E., 2000, "Implicit Leadership Theories in Eastern and Western Europe", Social Science Information, Vol: 39, No: 2, s: 335-347.
KOOMMOO-WELCH, P., 2008, Implicit Leadership Theories: Perceptions of Charisma, People, and Performance. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. North Carolina State University, North Carolina, USA.
KOOPMAN, P. L. ve diğ., 1999, "National Culture and Leadership Profiles in Europe: Some Results From the GLOBE Study", European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol: 8, No: 4, s: 503-520.
LANDEFELD, I.D., 2009, The Role of Implicit Leadership Theories on Leader-Member Exchange and Follower Self-Efficacy. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Walden University, North Carolina, USA.
LİNG, W., CHİA, R.C., FANG, L., 2000, "Chinese implicit leadership theory", The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol: 140, No: 6, s: 729-739.
LORD, R.G., FOTI, R.J., De VADER, C.L., 1984, "A Test of Leadership Categorization Theory: Internal Structure, Information Processing, and Leadership Perceptions", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol: 34, s: 343-378.
LORD, R.G.,, MAHER, K.J., 1991, Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance, Boston, Unwin Hyman.
NYE, J.L., FORSYTH, D.R., 1991, "The Effects of Prototype-Based Biases on Leadership Appraisals: A Test of Leadership Categorization Theory", Small Group Research, Vol: 22, No: 3, s: 360-379.
OFFERMAN, L.R., KENNEDY, J.K., JR., WIRTZ, P.W., 1994, "Implicit Leadership Theories: Content, Structure, and Generalizability", Leadership Quarterly, Vol: 5, No: 1, s: 43-58.
ÖZALP TÜRETGEN, İ., UNSAL, P. (değerlendirmede), "The Role of Leadership Perception as a Mediator between Managers' Self-Monitoring and Subordinate Attitudes", European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.
65
İlknur Özalp Türetgen / Sevim Cesur
Yönetim Yıl: 21 Sayı 67 Ekim 2010
PARIS, L., 2004, "The Effects Of Gender And Culture On Implicit Leadership Theories: A Cross-Cultural Study", Academy of Management Best Conference'da sunulmuş bildiri.
PAŞA, S., 2000, "Türkiye Ortamında Liderlik Özellikleri", Z. Ayçan (Ed.), Türkiye'de Yönetim, Liderlik Ve İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları içinde (pp. 225-241), Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları, Ankara, Türkiye.
PHILLIPS, J.S., LORD, R.G., 1982, "Schematic Information Processing and Perceptions of Leadership in Problem-Solving Groups", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol: 67, No: 4, s: 486-492.
PHILIPS, J.S., LORD, R.G., 1986, "Notes on the Practical and Theoretical Consequences of Implicit Leadership Theories for the Future of Leadership Measurement", Journal of Management, Vol: 12, No: 1, s: 31-41.
ROSCH, E., 1978, "Principles of Categorization", E. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd (Ed.), Cognition and Categorization içinde, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
SALTZ, J.L., 2005, "Beyond Simple Similarity: The Relationship Of Leader-Follower Personality Fit with Follower Satisfaction with the Leader and Follower Commitment to the Organization", Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, Vol: 65 (7-B), s:3759.
SCHWARTZ, S.H., 2006, "Basic Human Values: Theory, Measurement and Applications", Revue Française de Sociologie, Vol: 42, s: 249-288.
SIMONTON, D.K., 1986, "Dispositional Attributions of (Presidental) Leadership: An Experimental Simulation of Histometric Results", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol: 22, s: 389-418.
SINGER, M., 1990, "Implicit Leadership Theory: Are Results Generalizable From Student to Professional Samples?", The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol: 130, No: 3, s: 407-408.
STRAUSS, A., CORBIN, J., 1998, Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, London, Sage.
STRAUSS, J.P., SAWYERR, O.O., OKE, A., 2008, "Demographics, Individual Value Structures, and Diversity Attitudes in the United Kingdom ", Journal of ChangeManagement, Vol: 8, No: 2, s: 147-170.
ZHANG, Z., 2008, In The Eyes of the Follower: Cognitive and Affective Antecedents of Transformational Leadership Perception and Individual Outcomes. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, University of Minnesota, USA.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com