You are here

Home » Content

ÖĞRETMENLERİN ÖDEVE İLİŞKİN GÖRÜŞLERİ: ORTAMSAL ETMENLERE DAİR NİTEL BİR ÇALIŞMA

TEACHERS' OPINIONS ABOUT HOMEWORK: A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON CONTEXTUAL FACTORS

Journal Name:

  • Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study aimed to have a qualitative investigation of teachers' thoughts and identify how their thoughts are formed by contextual variables. Without any intention to generalize the conclusions, the data were gathered through the literature review and from the interviews held with three teachers selected through purposive sampling. Teacher willingness to participate and to share their thoughts was set as criteria in teacher selection. The interviews were content analyzed. The findings indicate that teachers' thoughts differ, and these differences are formed by some contextual variables (teaching experience, students' attributes, number of students in classes, etc.). When teachers are younger, their expectations are higher and as they get older, they place less responsibility on their students.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma, ödevle ilgili konularda öğretmenlerin düşüncelerine nitel bir yaklaşımla bakmak ve bu düşüncelerin ortamsal etmenlerce nasıl oluşturulduğunu belirlemek için yürütülmüştür. Genelleme kaygısı taşımayan çalışma için veriler, alanyazından ve amaçsal örneklem yöntemiyle seçilen üç öğretmenle yapılan görüşmelerden elde edilmiştir. Seçilen öğretmenlerin istekli ve görüşlerini paylaşmaya hazırlıklı olması ölçüt olarak belirlendi ve ayrıca, kişisel ve ortamsal özellikler öğretmenlerin seçiminde belirleyici oldu. Görüşmelerden elde edilen veriler içerik çözümlemesine tabi tutuldu. Bulgular, öğretmen görüşlerinin farklılık gösterdiğine ve bu farklılıkların öğretmene ve ortama ait bazı ortamsal özelliklerce (öğretmenin deneyimi, öğrenci nitelikleri, sınıflardaki öğrenci sayıları, vb.), şekillendirildiğine işaret etmiştir. Öğretmenlerin beklentilerinin, gençken daha yüksek olduğu ve deneyimle beraber, öğrencilere daha az sorumluluk yükledikleri belirlenmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ogretmenlerin-odeve-iliskin-gorusleri-ortamsal-etmenlere-dair-nitel-bir-calisma.pdf
  • 37
129-143
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Baumgartner, D.,
Bryan
, T., Donahue, M. & Nelson, C. (1993). Thanks for asking: Parent comments about homework, tests, and grades, Exceptionality, 4(3), 177-185.
Bennett, S. & Kalish, N. (2006). The Case against Homework: How Homework is Hurting Our Children and What We Can Do about It. Crown Publishers: New York
Beresford, E. & Hardie, A. (1996). Parents and secondary schools: A different approach? Bulunduğu Eser: J. Bastiani & S. Wolfendale (Ed.) Home-School Work in Britain: Review, Reflection and Development. David Fulton: London
Bryan, T. & Burstein, K. (2004). Improving homework completion and academic performance: lessons from special education, Theory into Practice, 43, 213-219.
Bryan, T. & Nelson, C. (1994). Doing homework: Perspectives of elementary and junior high school students, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(8), 488-99.
Bursuck, W. (1994). Introduction to the special serious on homework, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 466-469.
Check, J. F. & Ziebell, D. G. (1980). Homework: A dirty word, The Clearing House, 54, 439¬441.
Cooper, H. (1989a). Homework. White Plains, Longman: NY.
Cooper, H. (1989b). Synthesis of research on homework, Educational Leadership, 47(3), 85¬91.
Cooper, H. (2001). Homework for all - in moderation, Educational Leadership, 58(7), 34-38.
Cooper, H., Civey, J. & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003, Review of Educational Research, 76, 1-62.
Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J. & Nye, B. (1999). Homework in the home: How student, family, and parenting-style differences relate to the homework process, Contemporary Educational
Psychology, 25, 464-487.
Dauber, S. L. & Epstein, J. L. (1993). Parents' attitudes and practices of involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. Bulunduğu Eser: N. Chavkin (Ed.), Families and Schools in a Pluralistic Society (53-71). Suny Press: New York.
141
Adem Sultan TURANLI - Ç.Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 37 (2009) 129-143
Epstein, J.
L
. & Lee, S. (1995). National Patterns of School and Family Connections in the Middle Grades. Bulunduğu Eser: B. A Ryan, G. R. Adams, T. P. Gullotta, R. P. Weissberg & R. L Hampton (Ed.) The Family-School Connection: Theory, Research and Practice (108-154). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA
Epstein, J. L. & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers' roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 181-194.
Epstein, J. L. (1985). Home and school connections in schools of the future: Implications of research on parent involvement, Peabody Journal of Education, 62, 18-41.
Epstein, J. L. (1988). Homework Practices, Achievements, and Behaviors of Elementary School Students (Center of Research on Elementary and Middle schools Report No. 26). Johns Hopkins University: Baltimore, MD.
Feldman, S. (2004). The Great homework debate, Teaching K-8, 34 (5), 6.
Gill, B. P. ve Schlossman, S. L. (2003). Parents and the politics of homework: Some historical perspectives, Teachers College Record, 105(5), 846-871.
Hallam, S. (2004). Current Findings - Homework: The Evidence, British Educational Research Association Research Intelligence, 89, 27-29.
Hong, E. & Lee, K. (2000). Preferred homework style and homework environment in high-versus low-achieving Chinese students, Educational Psychology, 20(2), 125-137.
Keith, T. Z. & Cool, V. A. (1992). Testing models of school learning: Effects of quality of instruction, motivation, academic coursework, and homework on academic achievement, School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 207-226.
Kohn, A. (2006a). Abusing Research: The study of homework and other examples, Phi Delta Kappan, (September), 8-22.
Kohn, A. (2006b). Down with homework, Instructor, 116 (2), 43-68.
Kralovac, E. & Buell, J. (2001). End homework now, Educational Leadership, 58 (7), 39-42.
Kralovac, E. & Buell, J. (2000). The End of Homework: How Homework Disrupts Families, Overburdens Children, and Limits Learning. Beacon: Boston.
Simplicio, J. S. C. (2005). Homework in the 21st century: The antiquated and ineffectual implementation of a time honored educational strategy, Education, 126 (1), 130-142
Solomon, Y., Warnin, J. & Lewis, C. (2002). Helping with homework as a site of tension for parents and teenagers, British Research Educational Journal, 28(4) 603-622.
Strother, D.B. (1984). Homework: Too much, just right, or not enough? Phi Delta Kappan, 28,
423-426.
Turanlı,
A
. S. (2009a). Students' and Parents' Perceptions of Homework, Eğitim ve Bilim, 34, (153), 61-73.
Turanlı, A. S. (2009b). Students' perceptions of teachers' behaviors of social-emotional
support and students' satisfaction with the classroom atmosphere, Eğitim Araştırmaları
(EJER), 9 (35), 129-146.
142
Adem Sultan TURANLI - Ç.Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 37 (2009) 129-143
Van Voorhis, F. L. (2003). Interactive homework in middle school: Effects on family involvement and science achievement, Journal of Educational Research, 96(6), 323¬338.
Van Voorhis, F. L. (2004). Reflecting on the homework ritual: Assignments and designs, Theory into Practice, 43(3), 205-12.
Walberg, H. J., Fraser, B. J., & Welch, W. W. (1986). A test of a model of educational productivity among senior high school students, The Journal of Educational Research,
79, 133-139.
Walberg, H. J., Paschal, R. A. & Weinstein, T. (1985). Homework's powerful effects on learning, Educational Leadership, 42, 76-78.
Warton, P. (2001). The Forgotten Voices in Homework: Views of Students, Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 155-165.
Xu, J. & Corno, L. (2003). Family help and homework management reported by middle school students, Elemantary School Journal, 103(5), 503-518.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com