You are here

LEARNER AUTONOMY: WHAT WE NEED TO FOSTER AND HOW

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Learner autonomy has much to offer to language learners. It promotes not only learning outside the formal education, but also empowering learners to decide on their needs and to work on them. Autonomous language learning will typically entail reflection on the learning process, setting goals, and striving to achieve these goals, while actively being involved in the decision-making processes of their learning. This study inquires about whether or not learner autonomy is practiced by the students, without any formal education, preparatory year programme, in ELT department, at Çukurova University. The findings indicate that the participants are autonomous language learners who employ reflection, goal setting, and taking initiative to achieve their goals. Nevertheless, their responses show that they prefer the comfort of having the teacher as the sole decision-maker.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Eğitimde öğrenci otonomu dil öğrencileri için öğrenme süreçlerinde çok büyük fayda sağlamaktadır. Yalnızca resmi eğitim kurumları dışında öğrenimin devam etmesini sağlamakla kalmaz, aynı zamanda öğrencilere kendi ihtiyaçları doğrultusunda çalışma imkanı sunar. Dil öğreniminde otonom, öğrenme sürecini detaylı olarak etüt etme, hedefler belirleme, bu hedeflere ulaşmak için aktif bir çaba içerisinde olma, ve öğrenme sürecinde verilecek kararlarda doğrudan söz sahibi olmayı beraberinde getirir. Bu çalışma, Çukurova Üniversitesi, İngiliz Dili Eğitimi ABD, hazırlık öğrencilerinin bu alanda resmi bir eğitim almadan ne derece otonom bir yaklaşım sergilediklerini araştırmaktadır. Bulgular katılımcıların öğrenme süreçlerini etüt eden, hedefler belirleyen, ve bu doğrultuda çalışan otonom sahibi öğrenciler olduklarını göstermektedir. Ancak, veriler aynı zamanda katılımcıların karar verme sürecini öğretmene bıraktıklarını göstermektedir.
143-152

REFERENCES

References: 

Aoki, N.
an
d Smith, C. R. 1999. Learner Autonomy in Cultural Context: The Case of Japan. in. Cotterall, S. and Crabbe, D.
(eds.) pp. 19-27.
Benson, P. 2006. Autonomy in Language Teaching and Learning. in. Language Teaching 40:21-40
Cotterall, S. 1999. Introduction: Working With Groups". in. Cotterall, S. and Crabbe, D.
(eds.) pp. 43-49.
Cotterall, S. 2000. Promoting learner autonomy through curriculum: principles for designing language courses in. ELT Journal 54/2:109-117.
Cotterall, S. and Crabbe, D. (eds.) 1999.
Learner Autonomy in Language Learning: Defining the Field and Effecting Change. Frankfurt am Main
Crabbe, D. 1999. Working with Teachers: Introduction". in. Cotterall, S. and Crabbe, D. (eds.) pp. 139-142.
Dam, L. and Legenhausen, L. 1999. Language Acquisition in an autonomous Learning Environment: Learners' Self-Evaluations and External Assessments Compared. in. Cotterall, S. and Crabbe, D. (eds.) pp. 89¬98.
Deci, E.
L
. and Ryan, R. M. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behaviour. New York: Plenum Press
Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R. M. 1992. The initiation and regulation of intrinsically motivated learning and achievement. in Boggiano, A. K. and Pittman, T. S. (eds)
Achievement and Motivation: A Social Development Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Field, J. 2007. Looking Outwards, Not Inwards.
in. ELT Journal 61/1: 30-38.
Fonseka, G. E. A. 2003. Autonomy in a Resource-Poor Setting: Enhancing the Carnivalesque. in Palfreyman, D, and
Smith, R. C. (eds.) pp. 147-163.
Hedge, T. 2000. Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoffmann, A. 1999. Discourse Surrounding Goals in an Undergraduate ESL Writing Course. in. Cotterall, S. and Crabbe, D.
(eds.) pp. 89-98. Holliday, A. 2003. Social Autonomy:
Addressing the Dangers of Culturalism in
TESOL. in Palfreyman. D and Smith, R. C. (eds.) pp: 110-126.
Karlsson, L., Kjisik, F., Nordlund, J. 2007. Language Counselling: A Critical and Integral Component in Promoting an Autonomous Community of Learning. in. System 35: 46-65
Little, D. 1999. Learner Autonomy is More Than a Cultural Construct. in. Cotterall, S. and Crabbe, D. (eds.) 11-18.
Nunan, D., Lai, J., Keobke, K. 1999. Towards Autonomous Language Learning: Strategies, Reflection and Navigation. in. Cotterall, S. and Crabbe, D. (eds.) pp. 69¬77.
Oxford, R. L. 2003. Toward a More Systematic Model of L2 Learner Autonomy in Palfreyman, D. and Smith, R. C. (eds.)
pp. 75-91.
Scharle, A., and Szabo, A. 2000. Learner Autonomy: A Guide to Developing Learner Responsibility: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Palfreyman, D. and Smith, R. C. (eds.). 2003.
Learner Autonomy Across Cultures. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
151
Dr. Simla İçmez
Learner Autonomy: What We Need To Foster And How
Smith, R. C. 2003. Pedagogy for Autonomy as (Becoming-) Appropriate Methodology. in Palfreyman, D. and Smith, R. C. (eds.)
129-146.
Thanasoulas, D. 2000. What is Learner
Autonomy and How Can It Be Fostered?. in. The Internet TESL Journal VI/11. http://iteslj.org/Articles/Thanasoulas- Autonomy.html. Last accessed, 17 December 2007.
Thavenius, C. 1999. Teacher Autonomy for Learner Autonomy in. Cotterall, S. and Crabbe, D. (eds.) pp. 159-163.
Ushioda, E. 1996. Learner Autonomy: The Role of Motivation. Dublin: Authentik.
Ushioda, E. 2003. Motivation as a socially mediated process. in Learner Autonomy in the Foreign Language Classroom: Teacher, Learner, Curriculum and Assessment. Dublin: Authentik.
Vickers, C. H., and Ene, E. 2006. Grammatical Accuracy and Learner Autonomy in Advanced Writing. in. ELT Journal 60/2:
109-116.
152

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com