Buradasınız

Bireyselden Ortak Bilgi Davranışına

From Individual to Collaborative Information Behavior

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Information behavior is an important field, which is increasingly studied by different disciplines. It is known that the first studies conducted related with information behavior were system focused, their aim was to resolve problems of the system and the subject was approached in terms of information centers. However after 1980, the topic was tackled in terms of user/ individual. During the last decade, the focus shifted from individual information behavior to collaborative information behavior. The collaborative information behavior assists in taking ideal decisions by generating common sense through collaboration within the teams/communities. Both theoretical as well as technical studies related with this subject are still in the pre-paradigm stage. Limited numbers of models are developed with the increase of theoretical and technical studies. Factors like common platform, context, awareness, triggers, trust and their impact on the behavior are investigated in the collaborative information behavior. The variety of the interaction scenarios between man-machine (for example man-man, man-machine, man-machine-man, etc.), requires that the subject is tackled from social and/or technical perspectives and this leads to challenges in the conceptualization. Why and how the studies on information behavior, which is relatively a new field, evolved from individual information behavior to collaborative information behavior, where we stand now in terms of the studies and the opportunities presented by this field are discussed in the present study.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bilgi davranışı, farklı disiplinler tarafından artan bir hızla araştırılan alanlardandır. Bilgi davranışı ile ilgili yapılan ilk çalışmaların sistem odaklı olduğu, amacının sistemin sorunlarını çözmek olduğu, ayrıca konuya bilgi merkezleri açısından yaklaşıldığı bilinmektedir. Ancak 1980 sonrası, konu kullanıcı/birey açısından ele alınmış, son on yılda da akademik ilgi, bireysel bilgi davranışından ortak bilgi davranışına yönelmiştir. Ortak bilgi davranışı, ekipler/topluluklar içindeki ortak aklı işbirliği ile ortaya çıkartmak suretiyle optimum kararların alınmasına yardımcı olmaktadır. Konu ile ilgili gerek teorik gerekse teknik çalışmalar halen ön-paradigma aşamasındadır ve sınırlı sayıda da olsa modeller geliştirilmektedir. Ortak bilgi davranışında, ortak zemin, bağlam, farkındalık, güven gibi faktörler ve bunların davranış üzerindeki etkileri araştırılmaktadır. İnsanmakine arasındaki etkileşim senaryolarının (örneğin insan-insan, insan-makine, insan-makineinsan vb.) çeşitliliği, konunun sosyal ve/veya teknik açılardan ele alınmasını gerektirmekte, bu ise kavramsallaştırmada zorluklara neden olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, bilgi davranışı araştırmalarının bireysel bilgi davranışından ortak bilgi davranışına neden ve nasıl evrildiği, araştırmalarda gelinen nokta ve ortak bilgi davranışı alanının sunduğu fırsatlar tartışılmaktadır.
1
26

REFERENCES

References: 

Allen, T .J. (1969). Roles in technical communication networks. MIT. 20 Ekim 2013 tarihinde http://
dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/48979/rolesintechnical00alle.pdf?sequence=1
adresinden erişildi.
Amabile,T. M. ve Kramer, S. J. (2011). The Power of Small Wins. Harvard Business Review, 5(72)-83.
Amabile, T., Fisher, C. M. ve Pillemer, J. (2014). IDEO’s culture of helping: by making collaborative
generosity the norm, the design firm has unleashed its creativity. Harvard Business Review,
2(57), 64.
Belkin, N. J., Oddy, R. N. ve Brooks, H.M. (1982). Ask for information retrieval: Part I background and
theory. Journal of Documentation, 38(2),61-71.
23
Bireyselden Ortak Bilgi Davranışına BİLGİ DÜNYASI, 2014, 15 (1) 1-26
Blake, C. ve Pratt, W. (2006). Collaborative information synthesis: A model of information behaviors
of scientists in medicine and public health. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science and Technology, 57(13), 1740-1749.
Borgatti, S. P. ve Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and
typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-1013.
Borghoff, U. ve Pareschi, R. (1997). Information technology for knowledge management. Journal
of Universal Computer Science, 3(8), 835-842.
Brown, M. (1991). A general model of information-seeking behavior. American Society of
Information Science Annual Meeting, 28(9), 14.
Bruce, H., Fidel, R., Pejtersen, A. M., Dumais, S., Grudin, J. ve Poltrock, S. (2002). A comparison of
collaborative information retrieval (CIR) behaviors of two design teams. Information seeking in
context, the fourth international conference information seeking in context içinde (s. 147–173).
Lizbon: Universidade Lusıada de Lisboa.
Case, D. O. (2002). Looking for information: A survey of research of information seeking, needs and
behavior. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
Cohen, A. L., Maglio, P. P. ve Barret, R. (1998). The expertise browser: how to leverage distributed
organizational knowledge: collaborative information seeking. Washington: CSCW.
Davenport, T. H. ve Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they
know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. ve Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a
comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Denning, P. J. ve Yaholkovsky, P. (2008). Getting to “we”. Communications of the ACM, 51(4), 19-24.
Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind’s eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative–quantitative
methodology. J. D. Glazier,R. R. Powell (Yay. Haz.). Qualitative research in information
management içinde (s. 61-84). Englewood: Libraries Unlimited.
Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice: an overview of user interests in knowledge
seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36-46.
Ellis, D., Cox, D. ve Hall, K. (1993). A Comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers
The Journal of Documentation, 53(4), 384–403.
Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioral approach to information retrieval system design. Journal of
Documentation, 45(3), 171–212.
Ellis, D. ve Haugan, M. (1997). Modeling the information seeking patterns of engineers and
research scientists in an industrial environment. Journal of Documentation, 53(4), 384–403.
Fahey, L. ve Prusak, L. (1988), The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. California
Management Review and Journal of Universal Computer Science, 40(3), 265-276.
Fidel, R., Bruce, H., Pejtersen, A. M., Dumais,S., Grudin J. ve Poltrock, S. (2000). Collaboration
information retrieval (CIR). The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 1(1), 235-247.
Foster, J. (2006). Collaborative information seeking and retrieval. Annual Review of Information
Science and Technology, 40, 329-356.
24
BİLGİ DÜNYASI, 2014, 15 (1) 1-26 Hakan YILDIZ ve Nazan ÖZENÇ UÇAK
Hertzum, M. (2008). Collaborative information seeking: The combined activity of information
seeking and collaborative grounding. Information Processing and Management, 44(2), 957-962.
Hertzum, M. ve Pejtersen, A. M. (1999). The information-seeking practices of engineers: searching
for documents as well as for people. Information Processing and Management, 36, 761-778.
Hyldegard, J. (2006). Collaborative information behavior-exploring Kulthau’s information search
process model in a group based educational setting. Information Processing and Management,
42, 276-298.
Ingwersen, P. (2005). Turn: Integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Heidelberg:
Springer-Verlag.
Karamüftüoğlu, M. (1998). Collaborative information retrieval: Toward a social informatics view of
IR interaction. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(12),
1070-1080.
Karunakaran, A. ve Reddy, M. C. (2012). Barriers to collaborative information seeking in
organizations. ASSIST, October, 28(31), 1-10.
Karunakaran, A., Reddy, M. C. ve Spence, P.R. (2013). Toward a model of collaborative information
behavior in organizations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 64(12), 2437-2451.
Koschmann, T. ve Stahl, G. (1998, 14-18 Kasım). Learning issues in problem-based learning: situating
collaborative information seeking. Conference on computer supported cooperative work’de
sunulan çalıştay. 21 Kasım 2013 tarihinde http://www.researchgate.net/publication/2645080_
Learning_Issues_in_ProblemBased_Learning_Situating_Collaborative_Information_Seeking
adresinden erişildi.
Krikelas, J. (1983). Information seeking behavior: Patterns and concepts. Drexel Library Quarterly,
19(2), 5-20.
Kulthau,C. C. (1985). A process approach to library skills instruction. School Library Media Quarterly,
13(1), 35-40.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective.
JASIS, 42(5), 361-371.
Leckie, G. J., Pettigrew, K. E., Sylvain, C. (1996). Modeling the information seeking of professional:
A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals and lawyers.
Library Quarterly, 66(2), 161-193.
Malmsjö, A. (1996). Information seeking behavior and development of information systems: a
contextual view. Proceeding ISIC ‘96 Proceedings of an international conference of Information
seeking in context içinde (s. 222-235). Taylor Graham Publishing.
McDonald, D. W. ve Ackerman, M. S. (1998). Just talk to me: Field study of expertise location.
Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW
’98) içinde. 14-18 Kasım. 21 Kasım 2013 tarihinde http://web.eecs.umich.edu/~ackerm/
pub/98b25/cscw98.expertise.pdf adresinden erişildi.
25
Bireyselden Ortak Bilgi Davranışına BİLGİ DÜNYASI, 2014, 15 (1) 1-26
Paul, S. A. ve Morris, M. R. (2009). CoSense: enhancing sensemaking for collaborative web search.
Proceedings of the International conference on Human factors in computing systems içinde.
Boston, Boston: ACM.
Poltrock, S., Grudin, J., Dumais, S. T., Fidel, R., Bruce, H. ve Pejtersen, A. M. (2003). Information
seeking and sharing in design teams. ACM Group Conference içinde (s 239–247). Sanibel
Islands: FL.
Prekop, P. (2002). A qualitative study of collaborative information seeking. Journal of
Documentation, 58(5), 533-547.
Reddy, M. C.ve Jansen, B. J. (2008). A model for understanding collaborative information behavior
in context: A study of two healthcare teams. Information Processing and Management, 44, 256-
273.
Reddy, M. C., Jansen, B. J.ve Spence, P. R. (2010). Collaborative information behavior: Exploring
collaboration and coordination during information seeking and retrieval activities. Foster, J.
(Yay. Haz.). Collaboration information behavior: User engagement and communication sharing
içinde (s.73-88). New York: Information Science Reference.
Romano, N. C., Roussinov, D., Nunamaker, J. F. ve Chen, H. (1999). Collaborative information
retrieval environment: integration of information retrieval with group support systems.
Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 22 Kasım 2013
tarihinde http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.3.9681&rep=rep1...
=pdf adresinden erişildi.
Rouse, W. B. ve S. H. Rouse. (1984). Human information seeking and design of information systems,
Information Processing and Management, 20(1-2), 129-138.
Savolainen, R. (1995). Everyday life information seeking: Approaching information seeking in the
context of “way of life”. Library and Information Science Research, 17(3), 259-294.
Senge, P. M. (1998). Beşinci disiplin. (A. İldeniz, A. Doğukan, Çev.). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
Shah, C. ve Ibanez, R.G. (2010). Exploring information seeking processes in collaborative search
tasks. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-7.
Shah, C. (2010). Collaborative information seeking: A literature review. Advances in Librarianship,
32, 3-33.
Shah, C. ve Marchionini,G. (2010). Awareness in collaborative information seeking. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(10), 1976-1986.
Shah, C. (2012). Collaborative information seeking. The information retrieval series, 34, 78-103.
Sonnenwald, D. H. ve Pierce, J. G. (2000). Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts:
interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in
command and control. Information Processing and Management, 36(3), 461-479.
Spence, P. R., Reddy ve M. C.,Hall, R. (2005). A survey of collaborative information seeking practices
of academic researchers. Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM (s.85-88). SIGGROUP
conference on Supporting group work.
26
BİLGİ DÜNYASI, 2014, 15 (1) 1-26 Hakan YILDIZ ve Nazan ÖZENÇ UÇAK
Spence, P. R. (2013). Interconnectedness and contingencies: A study of context in collaborative
information seeking. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. The Pennsylvania State University.
Türk Dil Kurumu. (t. y.). Bağlam. 13 Şubat 2014 tarihinde http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.
php?option=com_gts&arama=gts&guid=TDK.GTS.5374cc7e06f7f7.94018408 adresinden
erişildi.
Twidale, M. B. ve Nichols, D. M. (1996). Collaborative browsing and visualization of the search
process. Aslib Proceedings, 48, 177-182. 24 Şubat 2014 tarihinde http://eprints.lancs.
ac.uk/53455/1/twidale_aslib_96.pdf adresinden erişildi.
Twidale, M. B.ve Nichols, D. M. (1998). Designing interfaces to support collaboration in information
retrieval. Interacting with Computers,10(2), 177-193.
Uçak, N. Ö. (1997). Bilgi gereksinimi ve bilgi arama davranışı. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 11(4), 315-325.
Uçak, N.Ö. (2000). Bilgi üzerine kuramsal bir yaklaşım. Bilgi Dünyası, 1(1), 143-159.
Wang, R.Y. (1998). A product description on total quality. Communications of the ACM, 41(2), 58-65.
Wilson, T. D. (1981). On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 3-15.
Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behavior research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3),
249-270.
Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science. Special Issue on Information
Science Research, 3(2), 49-55.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com